• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
beachnut said:
Explain what you mean and how Lear supports your claim of happening too quickly, because when I was flying at 600 mph, things were happening the same speed, my heart was beating the same, my radio worked the same, not too quickly, my eyes worked and not too quickly, and I put the jet exactly where I wanted.

On my first flight in a heavy jet I put it exactly in the center of the runway. When I flew high-speed maneuvers I put them exactly on target. Nothing was happening too quickly. Sorry, this makes no sense; did the p4t math challenged guys help you out. Lear knows this is true just like he knows there are aliens on the DSOTM.
Click to expand...

But would it be the same when you are flying through a city of high-rise buildings at 600 mph at only 800 feet altitude ? You would have the added distracion of the *'clacker' and be constantly buffeted by air currents rising from the streets of New York.

* the clacker is a device in the cockpit that emits a sound specifically designed to irritate the pilot and take his attention if he is flying at an incorrect speed as this plane obviously was. It cannot be disabled.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
BYou would have the added distracion of the *'clacker'... <snip>.

* the clacker is a device in the cockpit that emits a sound specifically designed to irritate the pilot and take his attention if he is flying at an incorrect speed as this plane obviously was.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I can see how this might be a problem for the "official theory." The last time I was intent on murdering hundreds of people, there was an irritating noise and I got distracted and ended up taking them all to Disneyland instead.

It cannot be disabled.
Click to expand...


Ah, there we go, problem solved. Apparently you're misinterpreting "no off switch is provided" as "cannot be disabled." (Or are the "clackers" still there at ground zero, still clacking away, unable to be silenced by any force on earth? Perhaps that's the real cause of the construction delays -- the builders keep getting distracted by the irritating noise and going off to Disneyland?)

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
The WTC buildings were BIG. You could see them from 30+ miles away on the ground, farther in the air. They were wider than any runway. Why would they be hard to hit?
 
phunk said:
The WTC buildings were BIG. You could see them from 30+ miles away on the ground, farther in the air. They were wider than any runway. Why would they be hard to hit?
Click to expand...
I'll repost this as your quetion is adressed in there.

HYPOTHESIS: Tripod 2.
After I realised that 9/11 was an inside job I got to thinking about what would have happened if the jets had actually missed one or both Towers. Actually missed them and crashed into the ground or another building.The video link below is a few pilots talking about how easy this would be to do at such high speeds.

Obviously if it WAS a set up investigators would have scoured the missed Tower or Towers with a fine tooth comb. They would definately have found the evidence of planted explosives. No way the perps could permit that. So what did they do ?

They installed 'Tripod 2' at ground zero from the night before 9/11. Tripod 2 was a large biowarfare exercise with all their kit ready to go the night before 9/11.

''A member of the Hyannis Fire Department, Tom Kennedy, was interviewed by Dan Rather after working for nearly 50 hours at Ground Zero. He said, "We arrived Monday night and started immediately''

I think the scenario would have been that if the jets had missed the targets the perps would have announced that there had been an Anthrax attack inside one or both towers. The building would have been instantly quarantined and prying eyes would have been kept away. The crowds would have been dispersed if not evacuated along with a portion of New York's other citizens possibly.

Then of course they would have had time and privacy to dispose of the evidence.QED.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=6819
Easy to
miss
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/fre...ipod_fema.html
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
But would it be the same when you are flying through a city of high-rise buildings at 600 mph at only 800 feet altitude ? You would have the added distracion of the *'clacker' and be constantly buffeted by air currents rising from the streets of New York.

* the clacker is a device in the cockpit that emits a sound specifically designed to irritate the pilot and take his attention if he is flying at an incorrect speed as this plane obviously was. It cannot be disabled.
Click to expand...

The clacker? Is that like the aliens on the DSOTM? What does the clacker in a 767 sound like and why would suicide pilots stop for a clacker? Clacker! Blucker!

911 was a smooth day, there was no buffeting and all the false junk ideas Lear puts out due to his ignorance of 911. He never studied 911, but gee he has those aliens on Moon and the manned missions to Mars, so he is full of information to fool you.

Lear got everything wrong on 911. And you are repeating his stupid ideas and you can’t even explain clacker, or the turbulence in NYC when 11 and 175 flew. You like apologizing for terrorists, learn what Lear pushes is pure bs.

Explain the 600 mph failed idea again.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well spotted. There we go....all fixed.
Click to expand...
So you have no inconuity evidence? No discussion, just a feeling? Got some reasons you failed to see there is no inconuity? What did you mean to say? Discontinuity? Inconsistency? What was your point?

bill smith said:
Is there an incongruity with the NIST report ? Which do you believe- NIST or your own eyes ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPR0hw-mqnk&feature=related 5-6
Click to expand...
You agree, the answer is no. Next delusion. Oops, you are repeating the tripod 2 junk.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
the top link is the video and it works fine for me.
Click to expand...

Sure it does now that you've edited the post to fix it...

Should have known it would be balsamo. I'll watch it when I get home and see what he has to say. I'm sure it'll be a laugh riot.
 
By the way the other link in your post is broken also, you might want to fix that too. The preview option is your friend....
 
beachnut said:
You agree, the answer is no. Next delusion. Oops, you are repeating the tripod 2 junk.
Click to expand...

Didn't think I'd see a guy using the "In plane sight" woo to attempt to imply a point. Them pod claim certainly brings back memories. ;)
 
Grizzly Bear said:
Didn't think I'd see a guy using the "In plane sight" woo to attempt to imply a point. Them pod claim certainly brings back memories. ;)
Click to expand...
It is easy to repeat the lies of the videos Bill presents. No thinking required. People too lazy to do critical thinking based on knowledge and sound judgment continue to fall for 911Truth delusions.
Balsamo and the other frauds on 911 are only taking the gullible for 15 or 16 bucks; a cheap lesson in fraud is the only good Balsamo can do for society with his manufactured paranoid delusions DVD sales. You have to look at the good side; after 911Truthers realize they have been taken, they may resist the next fraud attack on their mind and save big bucks.
 
Seems like batting practice in here. I mean, John Lear? "We arrived Monday night"?
 
Why did a nice Hawaiian girl like Hokulele get banned? We have enough brains, we need some beauty. :wackycry:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom