joobz
Tergiversator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 17,998
DOC, Your use of the holocaust in this example is clearly an attempt at an emotional appeal. It's meant to stifle discussion by invoking a taboo subject that is barely relatable to the current discussion at hand.So, I can't use history to support my argument, that doesn't make sense. And your vile language is bringing emotion into this logical debate. If your argument is logically sound you don't need to use that kind of language. So the more you feel the need to use that emotional language the more it leads one to believe your argument is not wholly based on logic.
Think, why did you use that example instead of (say) using the catholic churches blocking of condom use in Africa?
Or Why not use the example of crusades? of the inquisition? of the spanish conquistidors?
