NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by ULTIMA1
1. There are 2 phones, 1 black and 1 gray.

But they aren't actually that color. What physical color are they?


Originally Posted by ULTIMA1
2. The classification of the system is displayed at the top center of the screen.

And, specifically, that is?


Originally Posted by ULTIMA1
3. An internal phone number consist of the last 4 digits.

This is incorrect. I was using "internal" as a euphemism for "'secure".


Originally Posted by ULTIMA1
5. My SID is remisne.

So when I look you up in LDAP on Monday, you'll be there?

I did also ask for your internal number (by which we now know I man "secure"). Why did you not provide it?

Oops. I guess, despite appearances, Google doesn't know everything.
 
I'm not entirely sure who No Such Agency is either.

And for my part, it doesn't really matter whether or not he/she is actually at the NSA and in a position to verify the authenticity of ULTIMA1. Though he/she sure as heck sounds like it. ETA: I should clarify this. It doesn't matter to me, since if U1 is a fraud, he's not going to have to answer to me or anyone else on this board.

Anyway, ULTIMA1 failed my personal Turing test for people claiming to be involved in the intelligence community some time ago.

He still doesn't appear to know who was in Think Like The Wolf.
 
Last edited:
My God. You saved your second post to respond to him answering your first? That's some patience...or apathy...but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume patience.

There's a third option, you know... :tinfoil

To No Such Agency, welcome. Take a look around, and don't mind the inmates, they're quite harmless.
 
To No Such Agency, welcome. Take a look around, and don't mind the inmates, they're quite harmless.

Well, harmless if taken in small doses taken over a long period of time. Do not drive or operate machinery while on the forum.

Oh and Ultima? I know you're reading this so let me just say it's been a pleasure watching NSA chase your butt off this board not once but apparently now, twice. While you sit there thinking of what to name your sock, just know that you've been had. Royally.

Chizz!
 
His flight 93 "smoking gun" is contradicted by overwhelming amounts of actual evidence. 911files can show you the RADES data showing that no intercept took place. We know what fighters were in the air, none of them were close enough to UA93 to intercept it, none of them launched any weapons, NMCC forbade any engagement of civilian craft, there was no evidence of damage associated with an air-to-air missile strike, audio logs from the CVR clearly paint a picture of Muslim terrorists at the controls of the aircraft, the FDR does not show sudden loss of engine or any large-scale data interruption one would expect from a missile strike, there are voluminous records of in-flight phone calls from passengers prior to crash.

So, where are we? Either everyone at NEADS, NORAD, NMCC, LTC Nasypany, the victim's families, the NTSB, the FAA, the USAF, and first responders are lying and are complicit in the Impossibly Large ConspiracyTM......

Or ULTIMA1 has not actually seen the document he's claiming exists and filed a FOIA for. He has yet to produce anything resembling evidence that induces reasonable doubt in the official account of UA93's fate that would open the door, even a crack, to the possibility of there being a CRITIC intercept that UA93 was shot down. Rather, he has stuck to the tried and true truther strategy of moving goalposts, insulting the intelligence of people calling him out on it, appeals to authority - and uncharacteristic of most CT's on here, actually claims inside knowledge and priveleged position.

I've made my feelings on his NSA claims known before. No need to start throwing that manure around again. The fact that we're still waiting for this FOIA to materialize isn't necessarily his fault. The wheels of government turn slowly indeed, and we do have third party confirmation from 16.5 regarding this. There is a document, we just don't know what it says. However, ULTIMA1's behavior in the past does not, as I said, open the door to the possibility that he's onto something.

Dubious and probably illegal if he's not who he's claiming. In my opinion, downright unethical if he is. But, I digress, per the spirit of this forum - any more posting per his identity is not on topic per this thread. My schadenfreude assembly would like to see this question answered as much as the next guy, but it's not really our business.

ULTIMA1 - Enough of your tap-dancing. I'm going to tell you what CT's get told here all the time. Put up or shut up. Why should we take you at your word that there is an original document you've laid eyes on, and presumable worked with, that blows open the entire official account? Surely your supervisor must be aware of this, and would have made you swear to silence if this is to believed. Or are we to believe that the single piece of evidence that disproves the official account is lying forgotten in the SCIF at NSA, and you are the only one smart enough to find it and see it for what it is? Would you have us believe that NSA is full of people who don't notice things except for you? Even though those of us who have worked in the intel community know the opposite is true?
 
But they aren't actually that color. What physical color are they?


And, specifically, that is?


This is incorrect. I was using "internal" as a euphemism for "'secure".


So when I look you up in LDAP on Monday, you'll be there?

I did also ask for your internal number (by which we now know I man "secure"). Why did you not provide it?

1. Yes the phones are colored black and gray. The gray phone also has NSTS on it.

2. Top Secret.

3. Internal does not mean the same as secure. You should know this.

For making an internal phone call using the black phone you use the last 4 digits, so the answer was correct.


4. You should be using Searchlight to look me up.
 
Last edited:
His flight 93 "smoking gun" is contradicted by overwhelming amounts of actual evidence.


There is no overwhelming actual evidence for anything concerning the so called 9/11 official story.

Why do you keep spreading the lies?
 
There is no overwhelming actual evidence for anything concerning the so called 9/11 official story.

Why do you keep spreading the lies?

there are two ways to interpret your statement.
1) that you mean there is no single piece of evidence that overwhelmingly supports the so called official story
2) that you mean that all the evidence supporting the official story could have been faked

As to 1); this is true, given the large set of events covered there will be no single piece of evidence that illustrates that 19 Islamic Fundementalist Jihadists carried out the attacks and that the damage and deaths that day were directly caused by those attacks. There is ample evidence supporting each event on its own and the weight of that evidence and preponderance of such evidence does illustrate that the 'official story' is correct.

As to 2); The only way that one can use this arguement is to subscribe to the idea that such an impossibly large and complex conspiracy could be carried out. In fact it seems that the way that TM's routinely wiggle away from concrete evidence is to invoke the 'its faked' canard.
 
1. Yes the phones are colored black and gray. The gray phone also has NSTS on it.

2. Top Secret.

3. Internal does not mean the same as secure. You should know this.

For making an internal phone call using the black phone you use the last 4 digits, so the answer was correct.


4. You should be using Searchlight to look me up.


You still haven't answered all six questions. Dodge noted.
 
There is no overwhelming actual evidence for anything concerning the so called 9/11 official story.

Why do you keep spreading the lies?

Ultima, there is so much evidence that I can't even get to it all. Over the past few years I've obtained and uploaded to the net more primary evidence than you could have possibly reviewed. I still have ATC audios to convert and upload if I ever get the time. MikeW is scanning new documents as fast as he can and still can't keep up with the workload.

If you spent a little less time trolling and a little more time researching, you might actually find out just how much you don't know.
 
ANYBODY who declares that there just isn't very much actual evidence for the 'official story' is a fool. Call it faked, call it planted, whatever, then you'd just be wrong, but if you call it non-existent then you're an idiot.
 
There is no overwhelming actual evidence for anything concerning the so called 9/11 official story.

Why do you keep spreading the lies?
Are you the a budget analyst at the NSA? If your do work at the NSA you are an embarrassment for the entire USA at being so incredibly bad at figuring out 911. 7 years and you make up lies about a shoot down and you can’t figure out the evidence. Only a budget analyst could survive at the NSA with spewing crackpot ideas like you do.

Why is 911 terrorist's plot over your head?

 
Last edited:
At best you are budget analyst at the NSA. You will never prove you are in the NSA. If your do work at the NSA you are an embarrassment for the entire USA at being so incredibly bad at figuring out 911. 7 years and you make up lies about a shoot down and you can’t figure out the evidence. Only a budget analyst could survive at the NSA with spewing crackpot ideas like you do.

The 911 terrorist's plot was over your head.

Well Beachnut, I just got in the ATC audios from OTIS AFB today. I'm getting those up as soon as I can for the fighter jocky's among us. Boone870 reminds me I still need to get the Cleveland and Indy audios up. Man, for there being no evidence, I sure am keeping busy these days with a lot of it.
 
Well Beachnut, I just got in the ATC audios from OTIS AFB today. I'm getting those up as soon as I can for the fighter jocky's among us. Boone870 reminds me I still need to get the Cleveland and Indy audios up. Man, for there being no evidence, I sure am keeping busy these days with a lot of it.
Evidence? Ultima1 needs only failed delusions.
 
Well Beachnut, I just got in the ATC audios from OTIS AFB today. I'm getting those up as soon as I can for the fighter jocky's among us. Boone870 reminds me I still need to get the Cleveland and Indy audios up. Man, for there being no evidence, I sure am keeping busy these days with a lot of it.


What's the holdup with the Cleveland recordings? Is the New World Order Department of Audio Fakery shortstaffed these days?
 
I told Obama I needed more money if I was going to work for a Democrat. The check came in today, so I'll get back to my NWO duties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom