• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Gympie and ancient history

Earlier I miss spelt blackbirding, said blackbearding sorry/


Rubbish.


. . .many whites were black bearded around the world.


That isn't a mis-spelling - it's the result of relying on your fallible human memory instead of looking things up before you start typing.


So, enlighten us with your knowledge of blackbirding then. And remember it doesn't have to be your memory pitted against my Google-fu. You also have the powah.
 
Last edited:
This tread is tainted, I accept that you don't think arson but? I have lost interest in the banter and perhaps one day some may spend time in Gympie and see the things I have seen. Just passing through and drinking at the Freemason pub won't do it. Another investigator, Rex Gillroy has compiled a book or two on the subject, I have not read his stuff but had info passed to me by one of his friends. One thing you lot are very good at is barbed insults.
 
I think Akhenaton is left still wondering what you did actually mean by the comment about clearing the gum trees from the house. Arthwollipot suggested that you were referring to the fellow whose house didn't burn down after he had cleared the trees away from his house and got fined by the council, but you haven't actually confirmed that, or responded to Arthwollipot's points about trees close to houses not having a clear correlation to houses lost in the fires.

What is it about the insults you get here that makes them "barbed"?
 
The gum tree reference

I thought it was about the intoxicating gum that can be gathered from at least one species of eucalypt. This substance was an article of trade in Southern waters in days of auld lang syne.
 
Old Bob, here's a rule of life I adopted long ago: DON'T TELL TALL ONES TO THE GREENHORNS! They'll eat it up like ham at Sunday breakfast, and then refuse to believe the truth about the great wild places, no matter how honest you try to be.

Now ask me about jackalopes.
 
Here is an excerpt from the Membership Agreement.

The following are some of the behaviors that are not acceptable:

Advocacy of suicide or of violence to others: If you tell someone to kill or harm themselves, or to harm someone else, you will be suspended or banned without prior warning. Example: "Go kill yourself."

Sexual harassment: Defined as unwelcome sexual advances, sexual suggestions, or sexual content directed at another user, when reported. Generalized misogyny or misandry not directed at a specific user will not be considered "sexual harassment".

Extremely cruel or hateful content directed toward another user: This includes content in private messages. Generalized cruel or hateful content directed at groups will not be prevented in order that such topics viewpoints may be discussed, as long as such content does not encourage or incite violent acts.


The part that I've bolded above is what I had in mind when I made this comment:

What exactly is this a reference to? If it's what I think it is, then I conjecture that the report feature here is suddenly going to be utilised en masse by a group of people that I would normally consider very difficult to offend.


In response to this question:

Perhaps it's only silly in your mind Lionking. Cleared the gum trees from around your house yet?



Now, as it happens, both lionking and myself live on the fringe of what has become known as the Black Saturday fires of 7 February 2009.

Those fires claimed 210 lives, destroyed more than 2,000 homes and burnt 421,000 hectares.

Is it unreasonable of me to think that in the context of such a tragedy, a snide/cynical/sarcastic question such as Old Bob's to lionking could be interpreted as extremely cruel or hateful content directed toward another user?

I was, as I stated, unsure of my interpretation, and sought clarification.


Argh. That will teach me not to be imprecise with my words.


No way did I mean to infer that Old Bob had any kind of evil intent. I don't believe for a minute that he'd harm anyone, and I apologise that my post was vague enough on this point that any incorrect inference could be drawn.


Perhaps I'm just overly sensitive to fire-related matters at the moment, and I will await clarification from Old Bob himself before I comment further.


My comment about the report function being utilised is perhaps a reflection of the the way in which I would have reacted had the question been directed at me. Maybe I should have been clearer about that.

At no stage did it cross my mind that Old Bob was making any kind of threat, and in no way does my post indicate that I did. I assure one and all that if I believed any such threat, veiled or otherwise, had been made I would have notified the Police immediately. I do not depend on the report function of a public forum when I wish to notify the authorities that a crime has been committed.


Regardless, I don't think Old Bob would be so foolish to make a threat of arson on the board. Would he?

'Cause that would be, like, stupid.


I don't think so either, and I never went close to suggesting it.



No I certainly didn't take it that way. Old Bob may say many foolish things, but I don't believe he is malicious or hateful.


I didn't take it that way either, not for a second.


Yes, they do. They just happen to disagree with you and want evidence for your assertions. Hearts not required here, just evidence.


Yes, as a matter of fact. That's what I thought.


I think Akhenaton is left still wondering what you did actually mean by the comment about clearing the gum trees from the house. Arthwollipot suggested that you were referring to the fellow whose house didn't burn down after he had cleared the trees away from his house and got fined by the council, but you haven't actually confirmed that, or responded to Arthwollipot's points about trees close to houses not having a clear correlation to houses lost in the fires.


Thank you. I am indeed still wondering what he meant, but I'm no closer to finding out. Sorry I asked really.



I have to admit that I'm a little surprised and dissapointed that out of the entirety of the material I've posted to this thread, the only real reaction has been generated by this one little off-topic question.

What's that all about?
 
Last edited:
I thought it was about the intoxicating gum that can be gathered from at least one species of eucalypt. This substance was an article of trade in Southern waters in days of auld lang syne.


Not so much auld lang syne, actually. It's still a going business, particularly on Kangaroo Island in South Australia. More info when I calm down after the discomBOBulation.

Wildy probably knows more about it than I do.


Cheers.
 
This tread is tainted, I accept that you don't think arson but?


In a rare turn of events, I'm inclined to agree with you, however, unlike food and Fourex, tainted threads can be restored to their former glory. I'm definitely over the bloody gum trees myself, and I'm sure you are too, so let's move on.



I have lost interest in the banter and perhaps one day some may spend time in Gympie and see the things I have seen.


Some may have already. Do you have any way of knowing whether this is the case?



Just passing through and drinking at the Freemason pub won't do it.


Won't do what, mate?

Although mentioning the Free reminds me of another story. Remember cyclone Wanda in 1974? I was having a few beers at the Freemason's, I think on the Friday, and someone came in and said the river was about to do a banker. We grabbed a few tinnies and wandered down to Nelson Park to have a look, and when we got there, big geysers of water were shooting up out of the storm drains and flooding the park. It was quite spectacular.

Either that night or the next, we went to the movies, but had to leave ½ way through the second film because the cinema was flooding. Can't remember what we saw.

Still, you get used to that sort of thing living in the sub-tropics, don't you?

And it certainly has its benefits,

One of the things I enjoyed particularly was going for a ride out to the co-op wharf at Tin Can Bay and swapping my uneaten ration packs for a few kilos of fresh prawns. The trawlermen reckoned they were just the ticket for a night or two on the briney, and I love prawns. What a sweet deal.

I was lucky enough to be doing a bit of work up there later on in my career, although I was actually living in Toowoomba at the time, and had the opportunity to go out overnight on one of the boats. Learned a few things, but mostly I learnt that in the water is not the place to be.

Never saw so many noah's in my life. And they were happily swimming behind the boat with an equal number of dolphins, waiting for the discards. Very scary.

Speaking of working back in Gympie. We used to quite often set up operations on an old airfield in Toolara State Forest. I think it must have been one of those strips left over from the second world war, because the actual runways were gignormous, especially for our little Pilatus Porters.

Were you aware of the old airfields in the area, Old Bob?



Another investigator, . . .


Where was the first one mentioned?



. . . Rex Gillroy has compiled a book or two on the subject, . . .


Which subject? You've brought up at least half a dozen of them.



I have not read his stuff but had info passed to me by one of his friends.


I think that might be causing problems. Perhaps you should at least read your sources before quoting them.



One thing you lot are very good at is barbed insults.


Possibly true enough, although the evidence for it isn't in this thread. I thought I was being fairly polite, for my own part.

Stone the crows, cobber, if we can't pull the piss out of each other what's the bloody point of bein' an Aussie?
 
Last edited:
Flooded-out movies, ravening bush fires, drunk on eucalyptus gum -- damn, but I've GOT to get down to Oz!

Dunno about those Drop Bears, though. Don't like the sound of them.

And another thing: How do we know for sure that Old Bob isn't just taking the pish?
 
And another thing: How do we know for sure that Old Bob isn't just taking the pish?

I've thought so at times but if that's true, it been a consistent and drawn-out effort, because so far all posts exhibit either woo, conspiracy theories, wacky ideas about history or racism. And sometimes all of the above.
 
This tread is tainted, I accept that you don't think arson but? I have lost interest in the banter and perhaps one day some may spend time in Gympie and see the things I have seen. Just passing through and drinking at the Freemason pub won't do it. Another investigator, Rex Gillroy has compiled a book or two on the subject, I have not read his stuff but had info passed to me by one of his friends. One thing you lot are very good at is barbed insults.

As much as I love Rex to death. I used to know him when he ran his little museum in Katoomba, he is certifiable when it comes to every half baked idea that has ever been thought of in Australia.
 
All evidence suggests that he's actually sincere. And to be fair, he's certainly not the nuttiest Aussie in the world.

Ok, came back for a look, not sure if the above is good or bad, but got a smile. Racism, we're not racist go to Japan but don't get sick. In fact Australians are more tolerant than most of the world including me. It's not colour that matters just attitude. But intermarriage is a problem for both sides. The bit about the Freemason pub was meant as just a quick look at Gympie you wont find out anything, you need to dig around as the locals either don't know or won't talk because they get laughed at. (know the feeling) Another thing the drop bears carry syphilis. ( thats why we don't have convertibles)
 
Racism, we're not racist go to Japan but don't get sick. In fact Australians are more tolerant than most of the world including me. It's not colour that matters just attitude. But intermarriage is a problem for both sides.
Can you elaborate on this and explain how your opposition to "intermarriage" is not racist?
 
I think that sentence gave me whiplash. It's a classic 'I'm not racist, but...' line.

Athon

Here we go again If you had a pure herd of say black poll cattle and won prizes then you mixed them with say pure Dexter's, bet you would never win again. Why spoil different breeds? Now I would bet someone will quote Hitler as this is a no win diversion. (Tongue in cheek stuff) And tell me why are people so touchy about racism if it doesn't matter to them?
 
Who ever said that racism doesn't matter? We're touchy about racism because it's incredibly important. Lack of interbreeding between bloodlines leads to congenital defects, as any dog breeder will tell you. The races must be intermixed in order to stay healthy!

Genetics 101, Bob. Look it up.
 

Back
Top Bottom