Hokulele
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
And Ducky's posts in that same thread prove you wrong.
Your premise that Christianity is the "greatest system of morality" is unsupported. Using "Thomas Jefferson" is an appeal to authority. These are blatant logical fallacies, to put it in very basic terms, your arguments just don't make sense. They don't work.
If you're going to try to use logic to make your points, at least learn to do it correctly. Otherwise your facade will be too transparent.
That puzzled me too.What makesThomas Jefferson the final arbiter in such matters? I'm still waiting for the evidence promised us in the title of the thread.
Of course not. He avoided the term bible, which implies religion. He was completely against the fanciful stories of the actual bible.And by the way, Jefferson never referred to it as the Jefferson Bible.
And Ducky's posts in that same thread prove you wrong.
Of course not. He avoided the term bible, which implies religion. He was completely against the fanciful stories of the actual bible.
You know. The ones that claim that jesus was the son of god, had risen from the dead., had walked on water. Fed the masses....
You know. the nonsense.
So does Dawkins. Identifying one's self as a christian is a rather logical cultural thing to do.But that didn't stop him from thinking of himself and calling himself a Christian.
If you're saying Jefferson didn't financially support Christianity and admire its teachings like the title of that thread said you'd be very wrong.
Hahahah...keep living in your own little delusional world. Things like history, reality and hiw own words show how ignorant and deluded you are about Jefferson.But that didn't stop him from thinking of himself and calling himself a Christian.
I'm still waiting for the evidence promised us in the title of the thread.
If you're saying Jefferson didn't financially support Christianity and admire its teachings like the title of that thread said you'd be very wrong.
If you're saying Jefferson didn't financially support Christianity and admire its teachings like the title of that thread said you'd be very wrong.
You do understand dafydd was intelligent enough to know that those arguments are nothing more than foolish fallacies? He is asking for actual evidence, not the same horribly dumb arguments that geisler made and you already parroted.Here is my answer to this question, if people don't like this answer nobody is forcing them to keep coming into the thread.
http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
If you are unable to meet the OP's claim, you don't have to keep lying about actually providing anything more than some moron's opinion and delusional rants.Here is my answer to this question, if people don't like this answer nobody is forcing them to keep coming into the thread.
http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
...The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful...
And they would be wrong....These historians and scholars would disagree with you:
http://www.riversoflife.co.uk/index.php?page=quotes
Well he probably admired the approval of slavery.
And apparently Thomas Jefferson disagrees with you.These historians and scholars would disagree with you:
http://www.riversoflife.co.uk/index.php?page=quotes
can't we all just get along?And apparently Thomas Jefferson disagrees with you.
So that justifies their and Jesus' support of Slavery?Well he inherited many slaves at age 14 and Washington inherited his at age 10. Bottom line is that I think most people would agree that blacks in the US are better off today because Jefferson and Washington lived.
Well Jefferson inherited many slaves at age 14 and Washington inherited his at age 10. Bottom line is that I think most people would agree that blacks in the US are better off today because both Jefferson and Washington lived.