Astrophotographer
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,843
since Bob claims that there was, it's safe to say that Bob was not Patty.
Nope, that does not seal the deal Sweaty. You can not make such a claim without definitively proving it. We can not make the claim that Bob is in the suit or that "Aunt Bunny" is Bob in a suit. We can not even state that it is anybody in a suit. On the other hand, we can not state that it is an actual bigfoot. As I continuoulsy point out to you, we are left with two options:
1) It is a guy in a suit
2) It is a bigfoot.
I could list others but these are the two major claims.
Since we have no acceptable/legitimate proof that bigfoot really exists, it is therefore likely that it is a guy in a suit. The only person making the claim that he was the guy is Bob. There is circumstantial evidence to indicate that his claim is true (his horse, his association with Patterson, etc). Therefore, your nitpicking over things that could have been problems due to memory are not reasons to dismiss his claim outright. Keep trying though. I wish your skepticism about Bob's claim would extend to your examination of the film. For some reason, you blindly accept that bigfoot exists.






