• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Alfvén wave discovered

The journalist is incorrect when he says that Alfven waves have never been seen before. Maybe they've never been seen in the Sun this way, They've never been seen in the Sun before but they're seen all over the place in lab and space plasma experiments, and have been for decades.

Still neat, though. They used adaptive optics to see Sun surface features as small as 100 km across. With that resolution, a telescope on Mars would be able to see major cities on Earth.
 
Last edited:
Alfven Waves in the Lower Solar Atmosphere

Here is the paper from Science:
Alfven Waves in the Lower Solar Atmosphere
D.B Jess, et al.; Science, 20 March 2009
Abstract:
We report the detection of oscillatory phenomena associated with a large bright-point group that is 430,000 square kilometers in area and located near the solar disk center. Wavelet analysis reveals full-width half-maximum oscillations with periodicities ranging from 126 to 700 seconds originating above the bright point and significance levels exceeding 99%. These oscillations, 2.6 kilometers per second in amplitude, are coupled with chromospheric line-of-sight Doppler velocities with an average blue shift of 23 kilometers per second. A lack of cospatial intensity oscillations and transversal displacements rules out the presence of magneto-acoustic wave modes. The oscillations are a signature of Alfven waves produced by a torsional twist of +/-22 degrees. A phase shift of 180 degrees across the diameter of the bright point suggests that these torsional Alfven oscillations are induced globally throughout the entire brightening. The energy flux associated with this wave mode is sufficient to heat the solar corona.

This paper reports the detection of Alfven waves propagating from the photosphere to the chromosphere of the sun. De Pontieu, et al., 2007 report the detection of Alfven waves in the solar chromosphere. Like Jess, et al., above, they too assert that the energy of the waves is sufficient to heat the solar corona. Tomczyk, et al., 2007 report the detection of Alfven waves in the solar corona. However, other authors have said that these observations are inconsistent with the expectations of MHD theory, and Jess et al. suggest that they are better interpreted not as pure Alfven waves, but mixed magneto-acoustic waves. This would make the report here in Jess, at al. the first unambiguous detection of Alfven waves (which are pure magnetic waves) in the solar atmosphere.

Whether or not they are pure Alfven waves, or magneto-acoustic waves, I think it is significant that the authors claim sufficient energy to heat the solar corona. It has long been anticipated that one of the two is the major mechanism for heating the corona. I also note that Patsourakos & Klimchuk, 2009 (which appeared today; Astrophysical Journal, in press) report spectroscopic evidence that the heating of the corona is impulsive, which they attribute to "nano-flares". But "nano-flares" are probably the source of the brightening seen by Jess, et al. at the footpoints of their Alfven waves. So maybe we are seeing nano-flares launch Alfven waves and/or magneto-acoustic waves to heat the corona.

I link to the ADS page for all the papers. You can download PDF copies of the originals by using the arXiv link.
 
Great summary Tim. Though I'm not familiar with the work, and have niether the time or patience to trawl through the dozens of solutions that have been proposed to the the heating issue.

A new sort of wave, called Alfvén waves after the guy who predicted their existance decades ago, have been discovered in our sun. Fascinating!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090320102138.htm


Indeed. He predicted many other things too, some that people still doubt to this day, but will likely be born out in time. Check the thread Plasma Cosmology -Woo or Not?

As for Alfven waves, they do not explain the coronal heating problem. They do a good job at explaining some of it. But Alfven waves are a bit metaphysical for my liking, I know on small scales they have been observed, but I think that they are sort of over-used (too many of them are needed, too frequently, and too powerful) and they are a last resport to explain the problem. Alfven distanced himself from them in later years, along with magnetic reconnection and other things he himself first invented, which shows great integrity.

And some people will be surprised to find out from that article that the coronla heating problem is actually a problem. I've heard others claim before that its no issue and its been solved. An explicit violation of the inverse square law of radiation on this magnitude can not be ignored.

The best solution I've seen to far is also based on the work of Alfven, but not his Alfven wave theories, but his work on Double layers in plasma and how they may scale and effect large scale structrues. Donald Scott (Tims best friend!) has written a breif summary of this concept recently, that also has the benfit of explaining many of the other enigmatic problems with current solar models all in one go, without needing to add yet more separate theories and epicycles.

http://members.cox.net/dascott3/SDLIEEE.pdf
Abstract—Both observational evidence and theoretical study
suggests the presence of a plasma double layer (DL) above the
surface of the Sun. Such a DL, together with a single charge layer
(SL) directly below it, provides a possible explanation for the
existence of the temperature minimum in the lower corona, the xray
emissions observed above sunspots, and the enigmatic
variations observed in the intensity of the solar wind current. This
plasma sheath is arguably a generic feature, in varying degree,
around all stars.

Index Terms— Plasma sheaths, plasma properties, solar
atmosphere, solar corona, solar wind velocity, temperature
inversions, photosphere, velocity distribution.

I. INTRODUCTION

One of the most persistently enigmatic observations of the
near-solar environment is the temperature inversion that
includes the rise in temperature from approximately 5000K on
the photosphere to over 2 million K in the lower corona.
Immediately above the photosphere, the chromosphere
supports a temperature rise from ~5,000K to 20,000K with
increasing altitude above the solar surface. Above that, the
transition region is a thin, irregular layer in the Sun’s
atmosphere that separates the chromosphere from the hot
lower corona. In this transition region temperatures rise from
~20,000K to over 2 million K. This abrupt rise in temperature
with increasing altitude above the surface has been one of the
most unrelenting enigmas in our knowledge of the workings of
the Sun [1]. Because the solar atmosphere is constituted of
plasma, it has recently been suggested that a well-known
plasma phenomenon, the double layer (DL) may be involved in
a causal way in this mechanism. [.....]
 
Tim, do you just like that lightbulb sign?

Or is every post of yours a "eureka" idea type of thing?
 
Heating the Corona with Alfven Waves?

As for Alfven waves, they do not explain the coronal heating problem.
And how do you know that? After all, the publications clearly show that the energy invested in Alfven waves is more than enough to heat the corona, and we know that Alfven waves will transfer energy from the magnetic field to the charged particles. So what other knowledge do you have by which you can say with confidence that Alfven waves cannot heat the corona?

But Alfven waves are a bit metaphysical for my liking, I know on small scales they have been observed, but I think that they are sort of over-used (too many of them are needed, too frequently, and too powerful) and they are a last resport to explain the problem.
Once again, how do you know any of this. What are "too many" and "too powerful"? And what is "too frequently" supposed to mean? Is once, to heat the solar corona, "too frequently"?

And some people will be surprised to find out from that article that the coronla heating problem is actually a problem. I've heard others claim before that its no issue and its been solved. An explicit violation of the inverse square law of radiation on this magnitude can not be ignored.
There is no explicit violation of any inverse square law to avoid, so that is a nothing argument. Is the heating of the corona a problem? Of course it is, but not the way you think. It is not that there are no known mechanisms to heat the corona, but rather that there are too many perfectly viable physical mechanisms to heat the corona. The "problem" is how to choose among them, and not to find one that will work at all. You have it all fouled up.
 

Back
Top Bottom