• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
beachnut said:
You have no new delusions on 911; or do you? So far you just regurgitate what you have from 911Truth sources; pure garbage.

But take your best shot.
Click to expand...

In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 bang on centre screen, ignoring the burning WTC1 which is in shot but somewhat on on the periphery. Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but imminently to be hit face of WTC2. I find this shot HIGHLY suspect. He clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1 Naudet 2

PS click through the video from 45-47 seconds and see if you see anything odd
 
bill smith said:
In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 bang on centre screen, ignoring the burning WTC1 which is in shot but somewhat on on the periphery. Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but imminently to be hit face of WTC2. I find this shot HIGHLY suspect. He clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1 Naudet 2

PS click through the video from 45-47 seconds and see if you see anything odd
Click to expand...

First smoke generators now the Naudat brothers are in on it. I couldn't come up with this stuff if I tried.
 
bill smith said:
In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 bang on centre screen, ignoring the burning WTC1 which is in shot but somewhat on on the periphery. Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but imminently to be hit face of WTC2. I find this shot HIGHLY suspect. He clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1 Naudet 2

PS click through the video from 45-47 seconds and see if you see anything odd
Click to expand...
What a lie. You got more woo than most 911Truth terrorists apologists; are terrorists paying you to make stupid posts? Your failed opinion is a lie. How dumb can you make an opinion without effort?

That was the WTC towers framed in the center! What a failed opinion you have based on your failure to see the WTC towers centered in the frame. Good job making up a fantasy. Is this you best inside job smoking gun?
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
What a lie. You got more woo than most 911Truth terrorists apologists; are terrorists paying you to make stupid posts? Your failed opinion is a lie. How dumb can you make an opinion without effort?
Click to expand...

Well then....why didn't he dive for cover ? I mean this was the second jet in a very short time. We know he asn't deaf because they were speaking seconds before. Did you notice how still the camera went in the instants before the impact ? What is your take on this ? Try to be calm and collected.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well then....why didn't he dive for cover ? I mean this was the second jet in a very short time. We know he asn't deaf because they were speaking seconds before. Did you notice how still the camera went in the instants before the impact ? What is your take on this ? Try to be calm and collacted.
Click to expand...
Do you duck when planes go over at 700 feet and 590 mph? BTW, he did move. Oops, he moved. Did you watch your own video evidence you make up lies from?

Why would you duck when you are 1000 feet away? Did you duck?

It looks like they ran away when the figured it out! It takes a few seconds to react to a new event you have no automatic response for; you will learn this to your own peril perhaps.

Yep, they got scared and ran. Darn, there goes your failed idea. Else they would have kept recording. Darn.

Better try a new smoking gun for your failed 911Truth conclusion delusions of an inside job.

Next time watch your smoking gun evidence and try not to make up false ideas.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Do you duck when planes go over at 700 feet and 590 mph? BTW, he did move. Oops, he moved. Did you watch your own video evidence you make up lies from?

Why would you duck when you are 1000 feet away? Did you duck?

Better try a new smoking gun for your failed 911Truth conclusion delusions of an inside job.
Click to expand...

Well I think reflex and survival instinct would make most peole break off their filming. You may be made of sterner stuff though. lol
 
bill smith said:
Well I think reflex and survival instinct would make most peole break off their filming. You may be made of sterner stuff though. lol
Click to expand...
Yes, I was a SAC trained killer transferred to ACC and AMC. I watched SCUD Patriot engagements for sport and went right on working as our windows were blown out from SCUDs going off a mile away.

But the best answer to your failed post is...
dtugg said:
To give clues to mega genius investigooglers like yourself.
Click to expand...
This is why they did not stop filming!



Gee, they ran down the side road, and then came back! Do you watch your own video crap? Why are you failing so badly.

It is funny, in about 3 seconds after the fuel burns and bursts out the person filming moves back and then runs down the road. But then you stopped at your failed opinion.

This is classic what did I just see and a delayed reaction. Cool, at least I see confirmation of what I call ""the put the snake on the lap, takes 3 or 4 seconds for her to jump and scream! ""
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Yes, I was a SAC trained killer transferred to ACC and AMC. I watched SCUD Patriot engagements for sport and went right on working as our windows were blown out from SCUDs going off a mile away.

But the best answer to your failed post is...


This is why they did not stop filming!'



But gee, they ran down the side road, and then came back! Do you watch your own video crap? Why are you failing so badly.

It is funny, in about 3 seconds after the fuel burns and bursts out the person filming moves back and then runs down the road. But then you stopped at your failed opinion.

This is classic what did I just see and a delayed reaction. Cool, at least I see confirmation of what I call the put the snake on the lap, takes 3 or 4 seconds for her to jump and scream!
Click to expand...

What an interesting reaction .
 
240-185 said:
Can anyone sum up bill's claims so I can evaluate him with my crackpot index?
Click to expand...

I made no claim other than the video was suspect for the reasons I gave. If you can undermine those reasons please do so. If you cannot undermine them effectively we will know enough.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well I think reflex and survival instinct would make most peole break off their filming. You may be made of sterner stuff though. lol
Click to expand...

Well beyond the fact that the cameraman did run down the street for cover, which I guess makes your whole point moot...

Here is an interesting film that talks about the detachment the camera provides from situations happening right in front of the camera where the cameraman is in the zone of danger:

"How looking through the camera view finder can detach the cameraman from what is happening around him. The view finder gives the impression that you are watching a television show in part explains why the cameraman can keep filming under heavy fire."

http://cas.awm.gov.au/film/F10569

eta: It appears that the brothers were talking in French about what they were doing. What were they saying Bill? Wouldn't you want to know that? I suspect, but do not know, that perhaps they were discussing their thoughts regarding what and how they were filming this event, don't you agree?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I made no claim other han the video was suspect for the reasons I gave. If you can undermine those reasons please do so. If you cannot undermine them effectively we will know enough.
Click to expand...
Claims; multiple claims made

bill smith said:
In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 bang on centre screen, ignoring the burning WTC1 which is in shot but somewhat on on the periphery. Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but imminently to be hit face of WTC2. I find this shot HIGHLY suspect. He clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1 Naudet 2

PS click through the video from 45-47 seconds and see if you see anything odd
Click to expand...

Conclusion based on nothing
bill smith said:
... He clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit .
Click to expand...
You could read your own posts. Do you read your own posts?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom