• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
In addition to all the chair shots, barbed wire and Singapore canes he's taken to the head throughout his wrestling career, Sandman usually smashes a beer can into his forehead multiple times until he draws blood. Tell me that doesn't have a cumulative effect.
Oh, that and the drugs. The man's taken a lot of drugs by his own admission. Drinks a lot of beer, too.
There are some smart people involved in wrestling who would be good ambassadors for the industry. This guy isn't one of them.
 
a birthday makes him lose control



Best part is at the very end. When you can hear the cops screamin at him from inside the house behind the patio doors, barely audible.
PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!!!, PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!!.,DONT EFFIN MOVE!!!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Cookie Monster Did It! Stundie Motherlode.

From the Heart of Woosville, a veritable Stundie mine.

Someone posted this picture. Here's a challenge, before viewing the thread try and spot the woo "forewarnings" (See spoiler below for a sum up of most of them):-



874849ba91a61ca2d.jpg




Post 19

The Sesame Street Sign has the 'CTW' (Children's Television Workshop) initials on it. 'CTW' backwards is 'WTC'.
Sesame Street is an anagram of 'Tears seem set'.
So we have:
WTC
Tears seem set
'Monsters on the Loose' is an anagram of 'Oh loss! Enter Set's moon'
WTC
Tears seem Set
Oh loss! Enter Set's moon.
These guys allegedly worship the God Set, don't they? Since the moon on the book cover looks a bit like an eye, maybe that's Set himself looking down on what's going to happen
EDIT: Even weirder, and slightly more serious...this book is for the month of October 1976. Assuming that's October 1, 1976, do you want to guess how many days it was until 911? 9111.

Post 15

Eclipse shown with date of Oct 1976. There was a total eclipse on
Oct 23, 1976. Source. Eclipses are part of illuminati rituals.
Monsters noted in plural but only one "monster" shown. Are the "monsters"
the "hijackers"? And, "monsters on the loose" sounds an awful lot like the
idea of terrorists being pushed by the bogus "war on terror."
Pentagon-shaped object with one side damaged shown.
Sesame Street logo resembles UFO, and initials "SS" is, of course, also an
infamous Nazi organization. But, this is part of all Sesame Street material.
It's just "ironic" that an "SS" UFO is hovering over the WTC as it is being
destroyed by "monsters."

Post 23

Counting the grey columns at the top of the left building there are 9 and 11 grey columns at the top of the right building.

Post 50

Im surprised no one else has spotted it. If you look at the right of the sesame street logo, you will see an almost pyramid shaped eye on the right hand side, and if I am not mistaken, there's an eye there... once you see it, it's hard not to notice it. Very subtle though!


Post 52

Anyone else see the head of an alien-type fellow peeking out from the top of the destroyed building?

Post 54

Possible second face, with a beard?
Remember these areas show up as murky black on the original cover and the detail only appears when the image is digitally enhanced.

Post 58

Notice that the outlines marked in red in the version on the right are clearly visible and defined in the original on the left, once the contrast has been increased.
You can view the eclipse as the eye of a larger 'monster' and the right side of it's head, mouth and shoulder can be seen as well as the elbow of it's left arm, looming behind the Cookie Monster, with it's hands actually being the ones on the Twin Towers.
Like some hidden force in the background embracing the Cookie Monster from behind and controlling the destruction that will be blamed on him?

Post 59

Masonic checkerboard?

Post 71

'Grover' is what they call Bohemian Grove attendees.


Post 42

Its more than likely proof that the Cookie monster is a Satanic expression in our reality designed to condition children to be one of the 7 deadly sins.

Post 75

the fact that there are so many coincidences PROVE that they are connected in the quantum field at the very least!



BV
 
And Jane doesn't think men are people?

Are we not men?(We are Devo:duck:)


Are we Aliens? Vegetables? Animals? What?
 
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4497813&postcount=1348

Since C7 is clearly not inclined to respond I wanted to inquire with other posters concerning this information I brought up. I originally posted it because the conditions in the debris piles seemed to make for similar prerequisites as those mentioned in the sources I used. Just curious about what others would get out of it.
 
C7 is just a cranky old pensioner. He's been pleasuring himself to conspiracy theories his whole life. What's sad is, he's about three times your senior.
 
I have seen in some websites that Loose Change was intended to be a fictional movie. But I don't see any backup for this claim. Is there a place where it is proved that it was one, indeed?

Sorry if I missed it :S
 
240-185 said:
I have seen in some websites that Loose Change was intended to be a fictional movie. But I don't see any backup for this claim. Is there a place where it is proved that it was one, indeed?

Sorry if I missed it :S
Click to expand...

Yes. Dylan said it himself in a couple of interviews. I don't know which though.
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/POLL.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Hello “UNLoVedRebel”,

Long time since I visited this thread, I has a funny feeling you'd be up to something dishonest on it.

The data gives no information about gender-related angry personality types.

You have claimed it supports supports your "Angry Young Man/Boy/Baby" theory. Please explain how.

UNLoVedRebel said:
[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/corley.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

What does this photograph prove about the thoroughness of the investigation?

UNLoVedRebel said:
[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/demolition.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

More dishonest quote mining.

This passing, unsubstatiated assertion does not turn an article describing the work of a demolition company operation into one describing a forensic examination of the debris.


Brainache said:
And Jane doesn't think men are people?

Are we not men?(We are Devo:duck:)


Are we Aliens? Vegetables? Animals? What?
Click to expand...

Aches?

UNLoVedRebel said:
JihadJane debunks herself.
Click to expand...

Wrong! Your thinking is very muddled.
 
JihadJane said:
The data gives no information about gender-related angry personality types.
You have claimed it supports supports your "Angry Young Man/Boy/Baby" theory. Please explain how.



What does this photograph prove about the thoroughness of the investigation?


More dishonest quote mining.

This passing, unsubstatiated assertion does not turn an article describing the work of a demolition company operation into one describing a forensic examination of the debris.

Wrong! Your thinking is very muddled.
Click to expand...
EpicFail02.jpg
 
Oh, what to do when qualified experts conduct an investigation and the end result disagrees with your own investigation that consisted of watching videos and googling conspiracy sites? Well, here's one idea from the Boston WAC chapter.

You go to MIT to hand out clipboards with 9/11 flyers on them. You put up something called a truth kiosk. You make a fish-eye-lensed video of it and put it on youtube. But here's the kicker: at the tail end of your video, you tie back in to why it was you picked MIT of all places. You finish the video with a pitch for people to compel MIT to revoke the diplomas of Shyam Sunder, Frank Gayle and Richard Gann.
When you can't accept the findings of a real investigation, rather than prove them wrong with your own science know-how and investigatory skill, petition universities to revoke the diplomas of the investigators!

Could truthers really get more ridiculous?
 
JihadJane said:
This passing, unsubstatiated assertion does not turn an article describing the work of a demolition company operation into one describing a forensic examination of the debris.
Click to expand...

http://www.jod911.com/WTC%20COLLAPSE%20STUDY%20BBlanchard%208-8-06.pdf

There are names of demolition contractors and others you could contact to clarify and perhaps ask for the documentation they talk about. You would rather stay here and bleat like a child.

There were forensic investigations carried out on the steel. There were demo teams, forensic investigators and public officials in attendance during this. The process was not hurried according to peple who were actually there.

If you think otherwise then bring something, dont just play na na na.
 
2008 was a banner year for the "wearechange" cult

One of their members beat up an 18 year old girl in a wheelchair simply because she was a fan of Laura Bush. That went unmatched until one of the leaders of "wearechange" colorado. Stabbed his own father to death in his sleep, after his father called Alex Jones, to get the twoof mongers to leave his son alone. In a move that should not be surprising to anyone he pleaded guilty by insanity. or something like that. Will we be seeing anymore killer twoofers?
 
Last edited:
That's why I like interacting with truthers in the relative safety of an internet forum. It's by no means universal, but Jesus, some of those folks are just batcrap crazy!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom