It doesn't happen that fast.
Baseless speculation - show your working or a source or withdraw your statement.
Dump some dirt or sand in the bed of a truck and hollow out a place for it.
This would be an extremely dangerous operation because of the temperatures and the material involved. We don't continue spending large quantities of money developing refractory materials that are capable of resisting liquid steel for nothing. Transporting liquid steel is not like transporting water. Have you any accounts of truck drivers and digger drivers actually doing this?
You are hand waving Mark Loizeaux statement. He doesn't have a problem with admitting there was molten steel, why do you?
He is mistaken, he's saying from a second hand witness statement and we know that when they say "molten" and "steel" they are not necessarily meaning liquid and steel, but are using this as an analogy to best describe something that they have little experience with. Metaphor, simile.
We have a number of problems with the "molten steel" malarky.
- We have no evidence for it.
- No explanation for it.
Lets actually look at what you are claiming with thermite.
OK - the NWO transports an unknown quantity of thermite and installs it using unknown charges without anyone the wiser. After an aircraft smashes into the structure causing significant damage, the devices are all still in place and un-damaged.
At some unknown specified time the charges are set off by unknown means collapsing the building and killing 3000 people. The liquid iron from the thermite and the liquid steel that was melted via the thermite do not cool and are not spread about by the buildings collapse. The building is completely destroyed and it's constituents spread all over, but the liquid iron and steel are not affected and somehow pool.
This liquid stays hot enough to remain liquid for some considerable time and is large enough to form rivers or more than two digger bucket-fulls. Heat of the underground fires caused by the burning of WTC materials are not hot enough to keep the "molten metal" liquid however, the fires are fed by additional thermite that was left over from the original charges. The NWO miscalculated the amount of thermite they would need to do the job and ordered more than was needed to just cut columns. They ordered enough to keep steel liquid for weeks. Thermite burns at a high rate with a very bright flame yet no-one saw bright flames continuing to burn for days on end.
No-one knows how enough of this thermite managed to gather in the rubble pile in sufficient quantity to keep steel liquid for weeks, because a lone crusader says alot of it was found in dust spread all over Manhatten. No-one knows how the thermite that did gather was ignited, because we know you need high temperatures > 1000°C and these temperatures cannot be caused by fires (can they truthers?)
So just because thermite can melt small quantities of steel how can thermite account for all of this?
No wonder truthers get laughed at - it's preposterous.
During the clean up allsorts of small items were found yet no evidence was found of cutting devices, thermite, liquid iron/steel, detonators, radio receivers, det-cord etc. It's a bit of a mystery isn't it?
So come on C7 - give us a few paragraphs showing us how it all works. Give us a narrative, show us what you claim happened. Show us how the liquid iron from the thermite and the liquid steel from the structure could have remained liquid, then survived the collapse intact, then had sufficient quantity to pool, had sufficient thermal input to remain liquid for days and weeks.
You are so in denial] he's saying from a second hand witness statement and we know that when they say "molten" and "steel" they are not necessarily meaning liquid and steel, but are using this as an analogy to best describe something that they have little experience with. Metaphor, simile.
