I think you need to read up on Ruby Ridge.
I wasn't aware that there was a lower-end limit. Then again, I don't saw off shotguns and don't follow all the laws. I'm willing to accept that I was wrong.
Speaking of:
-----
This bears repeating: You're wrong.
ETA: And apparently you are quite insistent on remaining wrong...
I'm not wrong just because you say so, but it would be fabulous if you could share why you think so. Bringing up the Olympic (and other) sporting events is going to bring us around in circles, because many of those same sporting events (including at least one session of the Olympics) involved shooting live game before it was decided instead to use targets.
The purpose of a gun is to kill, the purpose of a plane is to fly, the purpose of a gun is to drive, the purpose of a hammer is to pound in (and sometimes remove) nails. A spade is a spade is a spade. There's nothing wrong with having fun
not killing with an instrument designed purposefully to kill, otherwise a whole lot of things would be illegal.
-----
Not at all (or at least not for any reason stated here . . . .) Its a matter of physics. The same reason in professional sports you do not pair a heavy weight with a feather weight and expect it to be fair, if you do not understand the distinction of my argument, perhaps you should reread my post.
If size was in any way a demonstration of my self image, then It would be an interesting dichotomy given my prevalence toward pacifism would It not?
It would be interesting indeed. I was just razzin ya, because I find guys talking about their physical prowess to be funny. I've had some martial arts training as well, but I'd count on good-ole-fashioned dirty tricks in most street situations, and there are a helluva lot of 'equalizers' that aren't firearms (depending on the situation) that can take away a size, speed, reach, or other advantage. I learned years ago that it doesn't take much to lay you (or, in my experience, me) out given the proper leverage. Most people just need to learn how to make use of that leverage (and I ain't talkin the physics type).
To all the self-defense types: I promise you, without a shadow of a doubt, that no matter what situation you can think of where a firearm can give you the upper hand that in a real-life situation you can count on maybe half that efficacy, at
best. The same applies to other weapons as well as physical attributes like strength, height, and skill in martial arts. The best way out of a victimization situation is not overwhelming force (though it can be nice), but being able to remain calm and identifying the most efficient way out of the path of danger. Sometimes that means giving up your wallet, other times it may mean shoving your thumb into someone's eye socket, or a number of things in-between and different. Nothing is going to make you completely prepared every time you walk out the door. Nothing. Assuming otherwise is usually people's first mistake.