• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
LTC8K6 said:
The stump or log is not causing the entire shape of her butt, just part of it. It's not quite as diaper as it seems, but it's still odd.
Click to expand...

It's still messed up. My opinion comes from all we see of Patty's nasty booty. Her legs look ghetto. The whole getup is just horrendous looking in those cibachromes. Like something a bunch of kids would tackle and the mask would fly off.
 
She's pregnant. That's where bigfeet fetuses stay.
What? That's not where they stay in primates?
So hat?
Its an unknown species, for Christ sake!
 
kitakaze said:
Needless to say, you know I think that to be a meaningless scribble. But let's spot you for a moment.

OK, I see your lines. Now what?
What is that supposed to demonstrate?

What's the take home message....
Click to expand...

It should be obvious.

Bob's head...covered in carpeting...has a high, and fully vertical forehead...

SpongeBobSquareHead5.jpg



Dfoot's head....covered in carpet...has a very high, and almost fully-vertical forehead...

DfootsJoke1.jpg



Patty's head.........NOT a very high forehead....and NOT anywhere close to vertical...

PattyHeadShape5.jpg




The 'take-home message'....

There is reason to think that Bob's head (or anyone else's, for that matter) may not be able to fit inside of Patty's alleged "costume" head...and, if that is the case...then Bob could not have been Patty.


.....and how can I know I'm taking something reliable and not some crappy scribbles?
Click to expand...


That's where you MUST rely on your skills as a thinking human being, kitty......to look at the analysis....and try to determine if there is an error in it, or not.
The lines I drew on the images do not involve 'science' as complex as quantum physics...you should be able to make a determination as to the accuracy of the lines.


Also, what the heck is going on with Patty's brow? And her legs and butt? You don't find her looking like a 100 miles of rough road?
Click to expand...


Sorry.....don't have time for these side-trails.
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
It should be obvious.

Bob's head...covered in carpeting...has a high, and fully vertical forehead...
Click to expand...

FAIL. You address the situation as though only carpet-like materials without anything else were used.

Dfoot's head....covered in carpet...has a very high, and almost fully-vertical forehead...
Click to expand...

You have a very strange idea of what constitutes almost fully verticle. You wanna bust out the crayons and measure from vertical there? You should really address the crazy-ass brow on Patty.

Patty's head.........NOT a very high forehead....and NOT anywhere close to vertical...
Click to expand...
There is reason to think that Bob's head (or anyone else's, for that matter) may not be able to fit inside of Patty's alleged "costume" head...and, if that is the case...then Bob could not have been Patty.
Click to expand...

Sorry, there is not. At least not a real reason.

That's where you MUST rely on your skills as a thinking human being, kitty......to look at the analysis....and try to determine if there is an error in it, or not.
Click to expand...

There is and it's not very hard to understand.

Sorry.....don't have time for these side-trails.
Click to expand...

The crazy-ass brow is certainly not a side trail.

Try again:

SpongeBobSquareHead5.jpg
PatHat.gif
 
Sweaty, how do you know this forehead is vertical ?
Do you have a profile shot ?

SpongeBobSquareHead5.jpg





You clearly have no idea what vertical is .. Since the slope of D'Patty's head and Patty herself, is almost identical ..

pathat4.gif


You need to lose that frame you have, where Patty's head looks flattened ..

Try this one where it looks just as vertical as the BH shot..

PatHat.gif
 
Diogenes wrote...idiotically..

You need to lose that frame you have, where Patty's head looks flattened ..
Click to expand...


That image is a higher-quality image of Patty than most....and especially the one you posted.
It's a Cibachrome image, I believe.


PattyProfileCibachrome2.jpg




The image that you posted is a much lower quality image...


Crapola.jpg


So....you think a LOW quality image is better for analysing Patty's body dimensions than a HIGH quality image is.

That's very smart....bordering on genius.


I'm glad you wrote that, Greg.....it helps show people what your true motivation is, here. :)


You clearly have no idea what vertical is .. Since the slope of D'Patty's head and Patty herself, is almost identical ..
Click to expand...


You have compared the angles incorrectly.
I'll explain how, tomorrow, with images.
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
I'm glad you wrote that, Greg.....it helps show people what your true motivation is, here. :)
Click to expand...

As does your fear of straight questions, your scribbles that take out significant size chunks, and your labelling baseball cap brow as a "side trail."

You have compared the angles incorrectly.
I'll explain how, tomorrow, with images.
Click to expand...

Tomorrow? Sweaty's great at tomorrows. Sweaty's tomorrows apparently are in a different time reality. Anyway, should be very exci*snore*
 
kitakaze said:
As does your fear of straight questions



Tomorrow? Sweaty's great at tomorrows. Sweaty's tomorrows apparently are in a different time reality. Anyway, should be very exci*snore*
Click to expand...



Due to your continual disrespectful statements, kitty.....you can have what you keep accusing me of.

I'll wait a month, or so, to respond to your questions......and it'll be even longer if you continue with the false accusations, and disrespect.

Wanna try for 2 months??! :)


There is no good reason why I should even respond to your questions, anyway....you have nothing to contribute to the discussion and analysis, except for endless mountains of ramblings and babble....which consist mainly of mischaracterizations, misrepresentations, and insults....along with brain-dead counter-analysis, like..."FAIL!!" :boggled:

You're a total waste-of-time to talk to, as far as I'm concerned.
 
SweatyYeti said:
Due to your continual disrespectful statements, kitty.....you can have what you keep accusing me of.

I'll wait a month, or so, to respond to your questions......and it'll be even longer if you continue with the false accusations, and disrespect.

Wanna try for 2 months??! :)


There is no good reason why I should even respond to your questions, anyway....you have nothing to contribute to the discussion and analysis, except for endless mountains of ramblings and babble....which consist mainly of mischaracterizations, misrepresentations, and insults....along with brain-dead counter-analysis, like..."FAIL!!" :boggled:

You're a total waste-of-time to talk to, as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

In plain non sweaty english:

Rats, foiled again- wheres the door?
 
Diogenes wrote:
You clearly have no idea what vertical is .. Since the slope of D'Patty's head and Patty herself, is almost identical ..
Click to expand...


To which...I responded:

You have compared the angles incorrectly.
I'll explain how, tomorrow, with images.
Click to expand...


Here is why Greg's compaison of the forehead slope-angles is bunk...he compared the slopes of the foreheads to the "vertical" of the image border... instead of the subject's faces...


Crapola22.jpg



I drew green lines...using my 'Greggy Green' crayon...:rolleyes:....to highlight the 'vertical' plane of the subject's faces....from which the slope-angle of the forehead should be measured.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom