• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
DOC said:
And besides there is very little evidence I can present in here short of Christ coming through your computer screen that's going to make prolific Randi posters (who don't believe they have souls) believe anyway.
Click to expand...
This is an obvious blatant lie.

You have presented NO evidence, just your silly little insinuations and an opinion of a moron who was dismantled within the first few pages of this thread. You can keep telling yourself this nonsense to feed your delusion but you are a disgrace to intelligence if you think you can fool anyone with your continued lies.

(who don't believe they have souls)
Click to expand...
You are a liar. I have clearly stated using YOUR nonsensical and essentially useless definition that there is a soul.
paximperium said:
As I've asked, define the soul.

I will go on record, "Using DOC's useless definition of a "soul", I'm willing to go on record to say that the "soul" exist since anything with computer and internet access including spambots that can leave messages on forums have "souls".

Of course I will also go on record to state that "Using DOC's definition of the soul, the billions of people in world without computer or internet access to have forums have no "souls"."

So did you have some intelligent point to this at all?
Click to expand...

So DOC, what was your point about the soul again or are you going to keep lying?
 
joobz said:
Actually, I'd like a definition of living and non-living.
Click to expand...
Are you sure?
We've already seen his definition of a "soul".
DOC said:
One of my definitions of a soul would be the thing that is capable of leaving thousands of posts on a the Randi website.

You didn't respond to my question. Is is possible for a thing without a soul to leave thousands of posts on a Randi website? If you don't believe in a soul then that question should be easy to answer.
Click to expand...
 
paximperium said:
Are you sure?
We've already seen his definition of a "soul".
Click to expand...
I know. :D

He defined soul in such a way that made all people who died prior to the existence of the Randi website as being souless. I wonder if he'll make similar statements with life.
 
DOC said:
And I'm sure you agree there is no evidence (only theory) that living organisms can come from non-living chemicals. The reason for that being it has never been experimentally proved.
Click to expand...
So Jesus was never dead and was never resurrected?
 
paximperium said:
Do you actually wonder if the Bible is even the real original works?
Click to expand...

@ DOC:
Assuming that you DO consider that your bible accurately translates/represents the 'original works', please name the version

Also, please explain how you know/why you believe which - if any - versions in the following list (taken from www.biblegateway.com) is/are less accurate?
English
  1. New International Version
  2. New American Standard Bible
  3. The Message
  4. Amplified Bible
  5. New Living Translation
  6. King James Version
  7. English Standard Version
  8. Contemporary English Version
  9. New King James Version
  10. New Century Version
  11. 21st Century King James Version
  12. American Standard Version
  13. Young's Literal Translation
  14. Darby Translation
  15. Holman Christian Standard Bible
  16. New International Reader's Version
  17. Wycliffe New Testament
  18. Worldwide English (New Testament)
  19. New International Version - UK
  20. Today's New International Version
Click to expand...

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Hey, you left out the Good News Bible. That seems to be the version that DOC seems to understand.
 
DOC said:
And besides there is very little evidence I can present in here short of Christ coming through your computer screen that's going to make prolific Randi posters (who don't believe they have souls) believe anyway.
Click to expand...
Ahem...

I'm not asking for 'evidence that supports belief'

I'm asking for what you promised in the OP: "evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth"

That you haven't got any is no big deal - as long as you don't mind being called a liar - which is your problem

That your so-called omnipresent, omnipotent god can't or wont provide any evidence is ridiculous
 
Last edited:
paximperium said:
As I've asked, define the soul.

I will go on record, "Using DOC's useless definition of a "soul", I'm willing to go on record to say that the "soul" exist since anything with computer and internet access including spambots that can leave messages on forums have "souls".

Of course I will also go on record to state that "Using DOC's definition of the soul, the billions of people in world without computer or internet access to have forums have no "souls".
Click to expand...

I never claimed spambots have souls. You know what I meant. I meant one of my definitions of the soul would be living creatures who post thousands of messages on the Randi site have souls. You're just trying avoid coming right out and saying humans don't have souls. Your have to say it in a indirect way as evidenced by your last sentence above.

Do you have the courage to come right out a say human beings do not have souls? Yes, or No.
 
DOC said:
I never claimed spambots have souls. You know what I meant. I meant one of my definitions of the soul would be living creatures who post thousands of messages on the Randi site have souls. You're just trying avoid coming right out and saying humans don't have souls. Your have to say it in a indirect way as evidenced by your last sentence above.

Do you have the courage to come right out a say human beings do not have souls? Yes, or No.
Click to expand...

Surely it depends on what you are calling a soul. An entity separate from from our living bodies? Did it exist before our living bodies?
 
DOC said:
I never claimed spambots have souls. You know what I meant. I meant one of my definitions of the soul would be living creatures who post thousands of messages on the Randi site have souls. You're just trying avoid coming right out and saying humans don't have souls. Your have to say it in a indirect way as evidenced by your last sentence above.

Do you have the courage to come right out a say human beings do not have souls? Yes, or No.
Click to expand...

A soul is considered a consiousness that exists beyond the physical body.
There is no evidence for a soul, human or otherwise.
 
DOC said:
Do you have the courage to come right out a say human beings do not have souls? Yes, or No.
Click to expand...
I already have... FSM knows why, though...

For me, its as meaningful/less as saying 'human beings do not have guardian leprechauns'

:confused:

Anyhoo...

Do you have the courage to come right out and respond to the points that I have addressed specifically to you?

Or are you hiding my questions behind a merely virtual ignore feature?
 
six7s said:
Ahem...

I'm not asking for 'evidence that supports belief'

I'm asking for what you promised in the OP: "evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth"

That you haven't got any is no big deal - as long as you don't mind being called a liar - which is your problem

That your so-called omnipresent, omnipotent god can't or wont provide any evidence is ridiculous
Click to expand...

But I do have evidence that I"ve posted several times, where have you been?

http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
 
joobz said:
A soul is considered a consiousness that exists beyond the physical body.
There is no evidence for a soul, human or otherwise.
Click to expand...

If there is no evidence for consciousness separate from the physical body how is it possible for the soulless bodies in here to keep demanding evidence?

It doesn't make sense for soulless bodies to demand evidence. Can physical living material demand evidence?

Can physical living material post thousands of posts on a Randi site?
 
Last edited:
DOC said:
If there is no evidence for consciousness separate from the physical body how is it possible for the soulless bodies in here to keep demanding evidence?

It doesn't make sense for soulless bodies to demand evidence. Can physical material demand evidence?
Click to expand...

Consiousness is a result of the physical body. We have direct evidence of this, as we can alter consiousness and personality by altering the brain, physically and chemically.
 
DOC said:
But I do have evidence that I"ve posted several times, where have you been?

http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
Click to expand...

I've just been sittin' here, on the Group-W bench, waiting for something, anything more interesting than that same ole, lame-arsed pile o'crap of Geisler's that you persist in spamming this thread with

Anyhoo, if nothing else, I note 'evidence' that suggests that I haven't been on virtual ignore...

So... I wonder... why don't you respond to the questions that I have specifically addressed to you?

Scared that your House of Cards will fall?

O, ye of little faith!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom