February Stundie Finals

[fezzic]

I thought 7, 16, and 19. 7 and 16 were close and I had to choose one (I know I can vote multiple).

 

[Cuddles]

I'm personally liking #11 myself.

Of course I love it when someone links to something that destroys their contention without realizing it!

Dammit! I actually voted for half the options, and I forgot to vote for one of the best.

 

[Klimax]

Dammit! I actually voted for half the options, and I forgot to vote for one of the best.

Did you at least voted for 8?

 

[dudalb]

#7 just for it's astounding ignorance.

 

[Myron Proudfoot]

19

I like 19. The suggestion that a model WTC could be built in Michigan or North Carolina was a nice touch. Why those states? Did the poster imagine they are empty and had lots of space? I would have volunteered a big, flat, sparsely-populated state like Wyoming or one of the Dakotas. But Michigan??

 

[Rolfe]

I like 19. The suggestion that a model WTC could be built in Michigan or North Carolina was a nice touch. Why those states? Did the poster imagine they are empty and had lots of space? I would have volunteered a big, flat, sparsely-populated state like Wyoming or one of the Dakotas. But Michigan??

It's worse than that Jim. The poster was proposing actual reconstruction of the actual buildings, using the actual original material.

Maybe because they build cars in Michigan? (Just guessing. The idea is beyond barking.)

Rolfe.

 

[quixotecoyote]

There is simply no way that linking to a snopes debunking for support should lose.

Period

eta: In a vacuum, #20 isn't that crazy.

 

[Myron Proudfoot]

It's worse than that Jim. The poster was proposing actual reconstruction of the actual buildings, using the actual original material.



Rolfe.

OUCH, even better. I caught the full-scale part but with original material?? I thought it was all wisked off to China in secret boats like the next day or something... hell, it they "collapsed in their own footprints" why not hold the demo at the original location?

 

[Travis]

OUCH, even better. I caught the full-scale part but with original material?? I thought it was all wisked off to China in secret boats like the next day or something... hell, it they "collapsed in their own footprints" why not hold the demo at the original location?

A previous Stundie had someone proclaiming they would only believe it wasn't a Conspiracy if they rebuilt the WTC in place and basically replicated the events all over and even then the outcome would have to be exactly as it was on 9/11 for this person to accept the results.

We did, of course, mock that persons ideas with great glee.

 

[Dave Rogers]

eta: In a vacuum, #20 isn't that crazy.

In a vacuum, nobody can hear you tergiversate.

Dave

 

[Travis]

In a vacuum, nobody can hear you tergiversate.

Dave

That thread made me want to brain my melt....er...melt my brain.

 

[Kiosk]

It's worse than that Jim. The poster was proposing actual reconstruction of the actual buildings, using the actual original material.

Yep. Reconstructing the buildings from the original materials.

And the planes.

That's right. The planes.

It's perfectly possible.

More or less. They guess.

 

[Klimax]

That thread made me want to brain my melt....er...melt my brain.

Brain-melt down imminent.That stuff is dangerous,should not google(and others) put up warning signs as they do with malware-ridden websites?

 

[Dog Town]

Nuhna,nuhna ...Nineteen!

 

[Travis]

Brain-melt down imminent.That stuff is dangerous,should not google(and others) put up warning signs as they do with malware-ridden websites?

Hmmmm Warning! Concentrated Stupid Ahead!

No, that would attract teenage boys in a way that only the promise of exposed boobies normally could.