• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
DOC said:
One of my definitions of a soul would be the thing that is capable of leaving thousands of posts on a the Randi website.

You didn't respond to my question. Is is possible for a thing without a soul to leave thousands of posts on a Randi website? If you don't believe in a soul then that question should be easy to answer.
Click to expand...

Provide evidence, solid and testable, for both the need for, and the presence of, a soul, in order for someone to post on the web site.

Mark Shaney could post to USENET, and did.
 
DOC said:
Those citations are nice opinions. What is the "exact quote" of Eusebius that shows he is a liar?
Click to expand...

Which proof are you referring to the first one, the second one, etc?
 
DOC said:
And you have also gone on record that people who leave thousands of posts on the Randi website don't have souls? Is anyone else willing to go on record?
Click to expand...

Do you have any evidence otherwise? Please, you're making the extraordinary assertion, you provide the soul for us to test.
 
jj said:
Which proof are you referring to the first one, the second one, etc?
Click to expand...
All of them, I want to know all of the exact quotes of Eusebius that show he is a liar and where these quotes were found.
 
jj said:
Provide evidence, solid and testable, for both the need for, and the presence of, a soul, in order for someone to post on the web site..
Click to expand...

So you too are willing to go on record that it is not necessary to have a soul to leave thousands of posts?
 
Last edited:
DOC said:
Using you're logic there would have been less slavery in the world and slavery throughout the world would have ended sooner if Christ and Christians never existed. This would be a ridiculous assumption. I have to believe the Rev. Martin Luther King, the Rev. Jesse Jackson, and Rev. Ralph Abernathy would agree it is a ridiculous assumption.
Click to expand...
Not at all. If christ never existed (if he existed), I'm sure slavery would have taken the same amount of time to get rid of.

It was (is) a pox on humanity.

But remember, I'm not the one claiming that Jesus was devine. You are.

If he was divine, He should have known better. He didn't.
 
DOC said:
All of them, I want to know all of the exact quotes of Eusebius that show he is a liar and where these quotes were found.
Click to expand...
I know you don't read anything of worth...even your own Bible, but here is a nice little pdf and nice articles for you that present the evidence that Eusebius forged and added things into Josephus' writings and others:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crosstalk2/message/4869
http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/marshall_gauvin/did_jesus_really_live.html
http://jesuspuzzle.humanists.net/CritiquesRefut3.htm
 
DOC said:
So you too are willing to go on record that it is not necessary to have a soul to leave thousands of posts?
Click to expand...
As I've asked, define the soul.

I will go on record, "Using DOC's useless definition of a "soul", I'm willing to go on record to say that the "soul" exist since anything with computer and internet access including spambots that can leave messages on forums have "souls".

Of course I will also go on record to state that "Using DOC's definition of the soul, the billions of people in world without computer or internet access to have forums have no "souls"."

So did you have some intelligent point to this at all?
 
Elizabeth I said:
...and where was that "evidence that the New Testament writers told the truth"?
Click to expand...
Well, he's rejected the "opinion" of multiple Biblical scholars about their conclusion of Eusebius and his lies but the "opinion" of Geisler, one of the worst apologists I or anyone here has ever read, is apparently evidence.

I'm not expecting anything bordering of honesty or intelligence from him.
 
DOC said:
OK, you've gone on record that people who leave thousands of posts on Randi don't have souls.
Click to expand...
Tell us what a soul is, and I'll tell you my opinion on whether they exist.
ETA: And the evidence is the thousands of posts this soul puts forth the effort to leave.
Click to expand...
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
 
DOC said:
And you have also gone on record that people who leave thousands of posts on the Randi website don't have souls? Is anyone else willing to go on record?
Click to expand...
I'm quite willing to go "on the record" (like that's any kind of meaningful term in relation to webforum posts) as saying that no people have souls, irrespective of their posting history on the Randi website. (where "soul" is taken to mean an immaterial presence that is not an artefact of a brain)
 
I, too, am more than willing to nail my colours to the soul-less mast

However, I fail to see the relevance in promoting what seems to be nothing more than a rather inane, pointless argument ad populum

Either souls do or don't exist​

I'll gain no comfort from being part of the majority if the majority opinion is wrong

Please DOC, quit arseing around; if you know and can demonstrate the existence and relevance of a soul, please do

Otherwise, please vacate the pot
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom