Most incriminating moon hoax evidence?

timhau said:
Yeah. And I just love the way CTists 'prove' moon landing hoaxes by examining NASA photographs. The Russians could only devote, oh, maybe years worth of manhours by people who know physics and photography without finding anything, and then a guy with two years of college, a web page and a tinfoil hat figures that out in minutes?
Click to expand...

Well to be fair, tin foil was hard to come by in the old Soviet Union.:D
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I hope that when the Chinese go to the moon that they will land in the Sea of Tranquility and one of the Astronauts will go over to what's left of the Eagle and exclaim "Holy... The Americans DID fake it!!!!! Look! This thing is cardboard!!!11!
 
Wowbagger said:
I can act like one, if it will help:

<hoaxer>
Oh, come on! You guys got caught out, and you know it! LOL!!! The video clearly shows manipulation of the shot of the Earth. Manipulation implies fakery. Why would they have such fakery, if the whole thing wasn't fake!! And, why would they need someone to direct the shot, from another location?!

Besides, the U.S. had enough spies in Russia to fake Russia's data, to make it look, to them, that there was a landing.

A moon landing would have been impossible, back then, because they ddn't have the materials to sheild the ship from the sun's own gamma rays, back then! Gamma sheilding wasn't invented until 10 years ago!

And, nobody notices that there is no food on the ship?!! What did the astronaughts eat?!! You so-called "smart" guys are such stupid, gullible sheeple. LOL!!!!
</hoaxer>

Does that make you feel better?
Click to expand...

Excellent. That helped a lot. ;)
 
Come on, this is to easy. The most incriminating moon hoax evidence? Look at the moon, hold your fingers up, it's like an inch wide. Sheesh.
 
Gangularis said:
Sorry... first Apollo mission to the moon...
Click to expand...


That's not right either. The first Apollo mission to the moon was Apollo 8, which orbited the moon. The second to go to the moon was Apollo 10, which tested the lunar lander in lunar orbit (it came within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface). The third mission to the moon, Apollo 11, was the first which had landing on the moon as its goal.
 
DavidJames said:
Come on, this is to easy. The most incriminating moon hoax evidence? Look at the moon, hold your fingers up, it's like an inch wide. Sheesh.
Click to expand...

Hehehe...I'm home from work with a broken leg and this is the first thing that has made me laugh in awhile. Thanks Dave. :)

My theory on why some folks buy into the "Moon Hoax": SCIENCE IS SCARY!
 
Alt+F4 said:
Hehehe...I'm home from work with a broken leg and this is the first thing that has made me laugh in awhile. Thanks Dave. :)

My theory on why some folks buy into the "Moon Hoax": SCIENCE IS SCARY!
Click to expand...

"Man has always found it easier to sacrifice his life than learn the multiplication table." - (from "Mr.Harrington's Washing")-Somerset Maugham

"Math is hard" - Barbie (by Mattel)
 
Last edited:
Corsair 115 said:
That's not right either. The first Apollo mission to the moon was Apollo 8, which orbited the moon. The second to go to the moon was Apollo 10, which tested the lunar lander in lunar orbit (it came within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface). The third mission to the moon, Apollo 11, was the first which had landing on the moon as its goal.
Click to expand...

semantics.. you know what i meant..

If you want to keep getting literal about it, then you're wrong. We didn't go to the moon until we touched down on it. After all, the moon's orbit does not = moon.
 
Corsair 115 said:
That's not right either. The first Apollo mission to the moon was Apollo 8, which orbited the moon. The second to go to the moon was Apollo 10, which tested the lunar lander in lunar orbit (it came within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface). The third mission to the moon, Apollo 11, was the first which had landing on the moon as its goal.
Click to expand...

What happened to Appollo 9 - was that the one that discovered the aliens and had to be covered up???? :eek:
 
Apollo 9 tested the LM maneuvering capabilities in LEO. It was supposed to be done during Apollo 8, but the LM took longer to complete than anticipated, so the mission order was swapped, and 8 flew with a boilerplate LM.

Fun mission to look at the transcripts - they basically went crazy with the LM - start, stop, rendezvous, APS "fire-in-the-hole" test, you name it. And it performed beautifully. :)

The guys who had the real kicker were the Apollo 10 crew. Everything fine and ready to go, they get to approach the surface within a few miles... but no landing.
 
more than once

I have noticed that many of the "No-Moon-Landing" loons don't realize there were multiple missions. They think it ended with Apollo 11.

CT " Well, why didn't we go back, huh!?!!?"

RP* "What about Apollo's 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17?"

CT: HUH? :confused:


My favorite though was the guy who thought the landing(s) were faked because TV signals wouldn't reach Earth from the moon in 1969. He remembered as a kid you couldn't get a TV signal from a town more than 100 miles away so clearly the TV signals from the moon were faked!

We had to explain the idea that the Earth was currrvvveeeeddddd


* RP=Rational Person
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom