Belz...
Fiend God
My faith in God is not blind! Jesus is who he says he is!!
And someone, just the other day, was trying to claim that Kathy is not trolling...
My faith in God is not blind! Jesus is who he says he is!!
In this case, I'm promoting alternate possibilities, which others are ruling out.
I'm ruling that possibility out,
I see. For many people it's possibly useful to imagine they had to justify their conduct before some higher order instance. It's not so for me, since I prefer to judge my conduct by means of another reasoning.That might be a sensible way to live your life if you did live in a simulation.
It might also be worth considering how you want to appear if all your private moments might appear on a DVD compilation sometime.
I see. For many people it's possibly useful to imagine they had to justify their conduct before some higher order instance. It's not so for me, since I prefer to judge my conduct by means of another reasoning.
Trying to match it against a categorical imperative. I imagine that to be within me, not above me (or others).And on what basis do you justify your conduct?
The atom is about 99.999999999999% empty space, so please tell me more about the material world which without the four forces is almost not there.How so? Are there any atheists here who are skeptical about the existence of a material world made of physical matter? If so, I'd like to meet them.
Trying to match it against a categorical imperative. I imagine that to be within me, not above me (or others).
I assume I'm an autonomous, rational being with inviolable human dignity. And others have the same dignity which, hence, I must not violate. This dignity (and autonomy) is inherent, based on the mere fact of being human. It is not donated or revealed and cannot be denied by anything or anybody.But then how do you produce a guide to conduct if it's entirely internal?
But then how do you produce a guide to conduct if it's entirely internal?
Most moral systems break down into a simple idea anyway; treat others as you would be treated. If you're logically able to get on board with that idea, and I am, then that's pretty much all the guide you need.
That's a crappy guide - it's asymmetric.
I assume I'm an autonomous, rational being with inviolable human dignity. And others have the same dignity which, hence, I must not violate. This dignity (and autonomy) is inherent, based on the mere fact of being human. It is not donated or revealed and cannot be denied by anything or anybody.
Most moral systems break down into a simple idea anyway; treat others as you would be treated. If you're logically able to get on board with that idea, and I am, then that's pretty much all the guide you need.
But where does the human dignity come from? Why treat others as you would be treated?
Self-interest.
Linda
But where does the human dignity come from? Why treat others as you would be treated?
Daaaaaaaaa, you treat other people good because you what to wake up in the morning. DaaaaaaaaaBut where does the human dignity come from? Why treat others as you would be treated?
Daaaaaaaaa, you treat other people good because you what to wake up in the morning. Daaaaaaaaa
Paul
I don't think that's what Herzblut is citing. If the fundamental principle is self-interest, then human dignity is nothing special.
It might be just me, but I can't quite follow any of what Paulhoff is saying. Random words seem to have been substituted.