• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
desertyeti said:
It's called a storyboard.
Directors have quick sketches drawn up of the proposed scene.
Includes the main actors, the background, set pieces, etc.
In this case, they are in order: Patty, a sloping forested hillside, and an open set with downed trees and root systems.
Click to expand...

Holy crap, I can't believe I never paid attention to the downed tree in Patterson's Roe drawing before. All that time I was focusing on how the Bigfoot looked instead of seeing what should have been obvious: the picture essentially depicts what's seen in the PGF long before the film was shot. I can't wait for the explanation for this from the proponent side. It'll probably be something about Bigfoot having an attraction to downed trees and logs, so it's only natural that Patterson filmed one that way.

Aepervius,

Someone edited that wiki entry for you. While reading through it, I was interested to see that someone added in a bit about natives regarding "skookums" as being strictly supernatural.
 
makaya325 said:
No, YOU say "eyewitnesses must be fake when seeing bf, but when someone says "i faked it", you accept it without evidence. You are a hypocrite (after 11 beeers)
Click to expand...

I don't say anything of the sort. Again you are using one of these:



Either provide an example with a quote and link of me say that or acknowledge the error, retract the claim, and apologize. And please tell me you are not posting drunk again. Please think about how you would feel the next day after having stumbled around a room full of intelligent adults whom you could learn much from being completely pissed drunk and acting like an ass.
 
28396499e0de633ca5.jpg

BobG likes to pick Cherries...Likes Chokecherries to.
 
AtomicMysteryMonster said:
Aepervius,

Someone edited that wiki entry for you. While reading through it, I was interested to see that someone added in a bit about natives regarding "skookums" as being strictly supernatural.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry and I hope my fellow Bigfoot skeptics can humour my following bit of childishness...

makaya325 said:
No, hypocrite. Try doing some research.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot


About half of all Bigfoot sightings are concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, with a roughly equal number of sightings spread throughout the rest of North America.[6][8][9] Some Bigfoot advocates, such as cryptozoologist John Willison Green, have postulated that Bigfoot is a worldwide phenomenon
Click to expand...

kitakaze said:
Let's check my research, shall we?
(snip)
Click to expand...

The very next day:

About a third of all Bigfoot sightings are concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, with most of the remaining sightings spread throughout the rest of North America.[6][8][9]
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot#Description

O HAI! IM KITKAZ N I OWNZ DA SILYY FUTRZ!! KTHXBAI
 
A film image and a photograph from the same location, the latter with a graduated 10' pole in it, were overlapped by three-point coincidence of background, stationary objects (trees and rocks) and fiduciary lines drawn under Patty's feet and over Patty's head. Result 7' 3.5". This was done by a professional image analysts with most of his contracts from the Dept. of Defense. He was very careful not to impugn his dredibility. He was NOT a BF addict or even really interested - he got hired.
 
kitakaze said:
You did not write most of that. You like copypasta. Please link the the silliness you are pasting from.
Click to expand...

You are truly right kitz! I love you for opening my mind to rationality and skepticism. Unfortunatelty, my culture gets very hostile when i talk about skepticism about bf!
 
makaya325 said:
You are truly right kitz! I love you for opening my mind to rationality and skepticism. Unfortunatelty, my culture gets very hostile when i talk about skepticism about bf!
Click to expand...

Don't worry, you can get drunk and do it on the internet and daddy will never know.

Bad dodge.

I see no links, no acknowledgement of the over %50 debunking, no acknowledgement of the NJ Bigfoot search efforts, no acknowledgement of the hilarious claim about very few roadside encounters... I could go on but I'm sure you knw very well how intellectually dishonest you are.

I just relish the thought that you told me to try some research and my research changed your source! HA! Eat it, kid!:D
 
makaya325 said:
A film image and a photograph from the same location, the latter with a graduated 10' pole in it, were overlapped by three-point coincidence of background, stationary objects (trees and rocks) and fiduciary lines drawn under Patty's feet and over Patty's head. Result 7' 3.5". This was done by a professional image analysts with most of his contracts from the Dept. of Defense. He was very careful not to impugn his dredibility. He was NOT a BF addict or even really interested - he got hired.
Click to expand...
Lets assume there were no SNAFUs with this estimate -something I highly doubt.
Now, care to explain why when one uses the size Patty's foot as a standart to measure her size a smaller figure is obtained?

Patterson and Gimlim filmed the real deal but hoaxed the tracks to "spice things out"? If this is the case, then at least part of "PGF package" is nothing but a fraud.

Don't you think one must be very bit naïve or tender a huge emotional attachment to the "Patty is a real bigfoot" to believe in such a thing?
 
Last edited:
kitakaze said:
You are personalizing a debate that isn't personal. You do this because you have weak arguments and nothing to support them.

Patty's tummy rocks are a joke and like no primate breasts ever seen. Weird unmuscle-like bulges and lines are clearly visible on Patty's legs. Keys? You lost me. Try explaining those freak features.
Click to expand...

Kit. I can clear up the "key" reference. It was a comment I made some time back, suggesting the bulge on patty's leg could be a set of keys that were in the suit wearers pocket. It was meant to be a light hearted post, but on reflection I now repeat it to be as valid a reason as any.

Please never let up, you make me laugh every day. :D
 
Last edited:
learner said:
Kit. I can clear up the "key" reference. It was a comment I made some time back, suggesting the bulge on patty's leg could be a set of keys that were in the suit wearers pocket. It was meant to be a light hearted post, but on reflection I now repeat it to be as valid a reason as any.

Please never let up, you make me laugh every day. :D
Click to expand...

Yeah, high five! :w2:

I actually realized what the key thing was not long after rereading my post and remembered that someone suggested it as a joke. Maybe silly but you're right. There's a far better chance that somebody forgot to lose there keys before putting on the Bigfoot suit than that being a shotgun blast or a hernia. To bad the PGF doesn't have sound. We might hear a jingle jangle jingle every step Patty takes.
 
I just weighed my set of keys on the kitchen scales ( yes I'm bored) 5 ounces, easily bulge/ hernia weight . I'm 6, 5 tall and 18.5 stone. I need a haircut. Anyone thinking of making a suit and need a model I'm all ears. Cheap as well.

Jingle, Jangle.
 
Last edited:
New Patty sculpture shown on Cryptomundo. It doesn't look a whole lot like her, but her boobs and diaper butt are now fixed.


sasquatch-sculpture.jpg
 
Is her diaper butt really just her left hand being viewed beyond her butt or has that theory been proven false?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom