Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

[kitakaze]

Why does roe's creature lack a sagittal crest?

You don't know that Patty has a sagittal crest. Meldrum and many other proponents argue that much of what people think is a sagittal crest on Patty may be just a tuft of hair. I know footer arguments far better than you do. They argue this because they know that a female ape having such a sagittal crest would be abnormal. It would also imply large jaw musculature designed for chew tough, fibrous vegetation in large quantities such as gorillas and Paranthropus boisei. They know that doing so centralizes the location of an animal and means they have great big bellies for digestion and they poo all over the place. Really, little mak, you think you can keep up with me?

 

[makaya325]

You don't know that Patty has a sagittal crest. Meldrum and many other proponents argue that much of what people think is a sagittal crest on Patty may be just a tuft of hair. I know footer arguments far better than you do. They argue this because they know that a female ape having such a sagittal crest would be abnormal. It would also imply large jaw musculature designed for chew tough, fibrous vegetation in large quantities such as gorillas and Paranthropus boisei. They know that doing so centralizes the location of an animal and means they have great big bellies for digestion and they poo all over the place. Really, little mak, you think you can keep up with me?

Large females would have a sagittal crest. What do you mean poop? It poops when it poops. Doesnt poop more often or less often than any other animal

 

[kitakaze]

They look fine to me. What YOU are seeing (rocks, lines) are paradolia

What everyone can see are rigid, completely hair covered breasts that stick out straight out like shells from Patty's abdomen. They appear to be full of a paste-like substance due to their lack of movement. They appear as no primate breasts. Only humans maintain breast size all the time. Other apes only have prominent breasts when they are lactating. Meldrum and other proponents have even argued that those features on patty may not even be breast but rather air sacs for making calls. They do this because they realize the breasts are just all wrong. Why don't you try a real debate with me and try explaining in what possible way those breasts could be considered normal rather than your typical empty "nuh-uh" style blurbfart posts. Do you suck at being a Bigfoot proponent or do you want me to eat your arguemnts for lunch?

 

[makaya325]

What everyone can see are rigid, completely hair covered breasts that stick out straight out like shells from Patty's abdomen. They appear to be full of a paste-like substance due to their lack of movement. They appear as no primate breasts. Only humans maintain breast size all the time. Other apes only have prominent breasts when they are lactating. Meldrum and other proponents have even argued that those features on patty may not even be breast but rather air sacs for making calls. They do this because they realize the breasts are just all wrong. Why don't you try a real debate with me and try explaining in what possible way those breasts could be considered normal rather than your typical empty "nuh-uh" style blurbfart posts. Do you suck at being a Bigfoot proponent or do you want me to eat your arguemnts for lunch?

The film quality is so poor that you cant make out patty's breasts. If you can say that, its only fair to say that patty has jiggling real legs, and is 7ft3. Fair is fair

 

[kitakaze]

Large females would have a sagittal crest.

This is the part where you explain because...

What do you mean poop? It poops when it poops. Doesnt poop more often or less often than any other animal

You don'tseem to be doing well at understanding plain English. Big sagittal crest=big jaw muscles=lots of chewing=lots of digesting=lots of pooping. Do you need to walk in a cow field to see that lots of chewing=lots of pooping?

 

[kitakaze]

The film quality is so poor that you cant make out patty's breasts. If you can say that, its only fair to say that patty has jiggling real legs, and is 7ft3. Fair is fair

You are too far gone, there's no turning back. You can't see Patty's breasts? Try telling that to all the footers out there. Try telling that to Sweaty who was just arguing Patty has no fingers, moving fingers, moving toes, etc.

The association you make is some kind a mental dissonance. Jiggling legs and 7ft3 came straight out of your butt. Try explaining the crazy horizontal subducting line that even Sweaty admits is there, weird, and more like a suit.

 

[makaya325]

This is the part where you explain because...



You don'tseem to be doing well at understanding plain English. Big sagittal crest=big jaw muscles=lots of chewing=lots of digesting=lots of pooping. Do you need to walk in a cow field to see that lots of chewing=lots of pooping?

Um, ok, and in the 72 million remote acres of the pnw, what are the chances of finding poop in dense brushes? Zero, even if its there

 

[Skeptical Greg]

The film quality is so poor that you cant make out patty's breasts.

What film are you talking about ?

 

[makaya325]

You are too far gone, there's no turning back. You can't see Patty's breasts? Try telling that to all the footers out there. Try telling that to Sweaty who was just arguing Patty has no fingers, moving fingers, moving toes, etc.

The association you make is some kind a mental dissonance. Jiggling legs and 7ft3 came straight out of your butt. Try explaining the crazy horizontal subducting line that even Sweaty admits is there, weird, and more like a suit.

You can see them, but you CANT POSSIBLY say they are unnatural or natural due to poor resolution

 

[kitakaze]

No weird lumps on Patty McLumpy, hey? Say hi to Greg:

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=16009&view=findpost&p=518216

Remember when Sweaty said you were a keen observer (he hadn't seen your comments about MDF yet)?:

The film quality is so poor that you cant make out patty's breasts.

Sweaty just post this last page:

I think Sweaty really will feel like an idiot for saying that now. More so than he already should, I mean.

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

You can see them, but you CANT POSSIBLY say they are unnatural Real or natural properties of a suit due to poor resolution

There, fixed it for you. That completely and perfectly describes every thing seen in the PGF.

 

[makaya325]

There, fixed it for you. That completely and perfectly describes every thing seen in the PGF.

Are you sure your a proponent? You appear to be quite like a debunker? You take your encounter over everyone elses credible reports. Hypocrite

 

[kitakaze]

Um, ok, and in the 72 million remote acres of the pnw, what are the chances of finding poop in dense brushes? Zero, even if its there

Bigfoot is reported all over North America. Don't give me your remote fallacy because I'll demolish it. Big sagittal crest=big jaw=lots of chewing=lots of pooping. Sightings all over NA from areas that can support large animals and their should be poop from the Bigfoot that you argue has an anatomy consistent with mega veggie eaters gorillas and Paranthropus boisei. Wildlife biologists use the scat that they find of all sorts of rare animals to make detailed observations of them. Don't be so out of it and stop pulling numbers out of your butt.

 

[kitakaze]

The film quality is so poor that you cant make out patty's breasts.

You can see them,

Hello, waffle. Need some butter? I think you're a little over-cooked but you're being eaten alive anyway.

but you CANT POSSIBLY say they are unnatural or natural due to poor resolution

The resolution is enough to support the following:

- hirsute

- rigid

- protruding straight from abdomen

- shell-shaped

I have supplied the evidence that proves this observation. Prove me wrong and don't even bother with a "nuh-uh" post (but you will, anyway).

 

[makaya325]

Bigfoot is reported all over North America. Don't give me your remote fallacy because I'll demolish it. Big sagittal crest=big jaw=lots of chewing=lots of pooping. Sightings all over NA from areas that can support large animals and their should be poop from the Bigfoot that you argue has an anatomy consistent with mega veggie eaters gorillas and Paranthropus boisei. Wildlife biologists use the scat that they find of all sorts of rare animals to make detailed observations of them. Don't be so out of it and stop pulling numbers out of your butt.

More than half of reports come from the pnw. Maybe the lower 48 are small pockets of these apes?

 

[kitakaze]

Are you sure your a proponent? You appear to be quite like a debunker? You take your encounter over everyone elses credible reports. Hypocrite

Are you sure your a proponent? You appear to be quite like a debunker as blue bear on BFF? You take your garbage evidence over everyone else's reliable evidence. Hypocrite.

Touche

 

[kitakaze]

More than half of reports come from the pnw. Maybe the lower 48 are small pockets of these apes?

Maybe this is another keen observation such as this one?:

Going near a road or a railroad would be the last thing something like that would do. Out of all these supposed sightings, very few deal with road side encounters.

That was you, right? You were the most clues footer ever that said that, right? Should I really be trusting little mak as an authority on Bigfoot reports because if you ask me, the evidence supports you as bein absolutely gonzo when it comes to the subject.

We can do the math if you like? Would you like that?

BTW, you'll notice that I can gatling post far better than you can and still provide reliable evidence and proof for my arguments while using your own statements to deep-fry you.

 

[makaya325]

No, hypocrite. Try doing some research.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot


About half of all Bigfoot sightings are concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, with a roughly equal number of sightings spread throughout the rest of North America.[6][8][9] Some Bigfoot advocates, such as cryptozoologist John Willison Green, have postulated that Bigfoot is a worldwide phenomenon

That was you, right? You were the most clues footer ever that said that, right? Should I really be trusting little mak as an authority on Bigfoot reports because if you ask me, the evidence supports you as bein absolutely gonzo when it comes to the subject.

\

Learn how to spell genius. Its clueless

We can do the math if you like? Would you like that?

Sure why not

BTW, you'll notice that I can gatling post far better than you can and still provide reliable evidence and proof for my arguments while using your own statements to deep-fry you.[/QUOTE]

 

[makaya325]

Are you sure your a proponent? You appear to be quite like a debunker as blue bear on BFF? You take your garbage evidence over everyone else's reliable evidence. Hypocrite.

Touche

No, your wrong kitz. Long is a hypocrite: Hes 80 percent confident he saw bigfoot, but when he hears other sightings, hes say they are all wrong

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

No, your wrong kitz. Long is a hypocrite: Hes 80 percent confident he saw bigfoot, but when he hears other sightings, hes say they are all wrong

Thats correct.

I have faith in what I think I saw ( about 80%) and I know my standards of evidence and proof. When I hear other sightings, I say the INVESTIGATION was wrong or other flags.

Make sure you get your facts straight