• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

alien life possibility is pathetic

SETI appears rabid against The idea that some UFO'S might be aliens. Its not like any of them ever followed up on reports or documents

Wait, wait, wait. Before this you were arguing AGAINST the very existence of alien life... and now you're saying that SETI is wrong in dismissing some UFO sightings as alien ?

You're just a damn troll, is what you are.
 
SETI appears rabid against The idea that some UFO'S might be aliens. Its not like any of them ever followed up on reports or documents

I never said UFO'S are aliens.

Both Ufology and Seti fail. Why dont we try to revive project orion?

facepalm.jpg
 
Wait, wait, wait. Before this you were arguing AGAINST the very existence of alien life... and now you're saying that SETI is wrong in dismissing some UFO sightings as alien ?

You're just a damn troll, is what you are.

No im not a damn troll. I think its wrong to DISMISS the subject of ufo's out of hand. These objects have defied analysis for decades. 21.5% Of ufo cases were unexplained, compared to the 9% not enough data. These craft defy our modern technology, and it should be more throughly investigated by neutral scientists, like ted acworth, not kitakaze,
 
I never said UFO'S are aliens.

Both Ufology and Seti fail. Why dont we try to revive project orion?

So troll boy which Project Orion are you talking about (pulling out of thin air) now?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Project Orion may mean:

* Project Orion (nuclear propulsion) was an engineering design study of spacecraft powered by nuclear pulse propulsion
* Project Orion within the Constellation program to create the Orion Spacecraft that will replace the US Space Shuttle fleet
* Project Orion is the name of one of several projects to build a laser broom for the International Space Station
* Project ORION is the SPARTAN-I program in the fictional Halo (series)
*****

Given that NONE of the above have anything to do with search for ET Life.

Oh and your current position that there is something more to UFO's really does prove you're a Troll and not a very good one, given that you've previously tried to start a thread on how to debunk UFO's.

It's True...
 
No im not a damn troll. I think its wrong to DISMISS the subject of ufo's out of hand. These objects have defied analysis for decades. 21.5% Of ufo cases were unexplained, compared to the 9% not enough data. These craft defy our modern technology, and it should be more throughly investigated by neutral scientists, like ted acworth, not kitakaze,

Who's numbers are you using this time, little mak? From arguing any alien life at all, to criticizing SETI for dismissing UFO's as alien life, to pulling more numbers out of your butt. Mind you, this is after you argued that Bigfoot has plenty of evidence while UFO have none:

lmakaya325 @ AAH said:
Kitz, lets see

bigfoot: tested hair that has remained an anomaly, poop, tracks, recorded sounds, sightings, video, great ape behaviors

ufo's: none?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4352908#post4352908
 
I don't think SETI actually holds radio astronomy as a preconception, rather our best chance to actually detect alien life. Can you think of a better method to detect life many light years away given current technology?

Not sure if it has been mentioned yet since I searched but haven't had time to read the whole thread, but there is Optical SETI, OSETI.

There was a write up about it in one of the Planetary Society member publications that I got a few months ago. They can search large chunks of the sky at the same time looking for light signals, much better then the narrow window of radio signals. Apparently they currently have a few suspect signals that they will check over again in the future.

http://planetary.org/programs/projects/seti_optical_searches/
 
Not sure if it has been mentioned yet since I searched but haven't had time to read the whole thread, but there is Optical SETI, OSETI.

There was a write up about it in one of the Planetary Society member publications that I got a few months ago. They can search large chunks of the sky at the same time looking for light signals, much better then the narrow window of radio signals. Apparently they currently have a few suspect signals that they will check over again in the future.

http://planetary.org/programs/projects/seti_optical_searches/
I had no idea they were searching the optical spectrum. Thanks for the link.
 
You just praised me for opening my mind, yet you shoot me down? Your arent my guardian

You need to learn balance. I did praise you in a manner for at least presenting the image of changing your thoughts enough to consider ET life as not an impossibility. What you're doing now is not opening your mind so much as it is cracking your head open and letting your brain fall out. Take a moment, makaya, to imagine how it is for the posters that communicate with you. You flail wildly waffling all over the place but manage to do so coming off like a punk kid who thinks he knows everything. You never goive any manner of serious consideration to the arguments presented to you or put any actual thought into your responses. Most people aren't even interested in taking you seriously because your own actions have made you look like a troll pretty much everywhere you go. What do you think you can do to rectify the situation?

What should people make of a know-it-all kid who assert no evidence for alien UFO's then chastizes others, including a major scientific project, for not endorsing the subject? Why haven't you thought about this?
 
No im not a damn troll. I think its wrong to DISMISS the subject of ufo's out of hand. These objects have defied analysis for decades.

Only to those who would rather not study the phenomenon.

If you're not a troll then you're hopelessly ignorant of the subject matters that you, so far, have discussed.
 
Actually the point is no one can know what is outside the Universe, nothing or something.

No. The universe encompasses everything, by definition. To be more accurate, there is no outside for there to be either something or nothing in.
 
You need to learn balance. I did praise you in a manner for at least presenting the image of changing your thoughts enough to consider ET life as not an impossibility. What you're doing now is not opening your mind so much as it is cracking your head open and letting your brain fall out. Take a moment, makaya, to imagine how it is for the posters that communicate with you. You flail wildly waffling all over the place but manage to do so coming off like a punk kid who thinks he knows everything. You never goive any manner of serious consideration to the arguments presented to you or put any actual thought into your responses. Most people aren't even interested in taking you seriously because your own actions have made you look like a troll pretty much everywhere you go. What do you think you can do to rectify the situation?

What should people make of a know-it-all kid who assert no evidence for alien UFO's then chastizes others, including a major scientific project, for not endorsing the subject? Why haven't you thought about this?


I have no idea, kitz. Why dont you stop following me around and posting my posts to everyone else
 
I am fully aware of everyone on the forum believing ufo's are simply man made and made up, But im talking about et life. Isnt it so ignorant and wooish to suggest that we arent the only life in the universe? Come on, does anyone see the incredibly complex events on earth that made it even POSSIBLE for the simplest of life to form? How can anyone believe it is even possible for 100's of unique events to happen just right on other planets. You need the right sun, the right planet size, the right galaxy, the right moon, etc and the list goes on and on from there. Why do many of you fall for the et life credibility?

No im not a damn troll. I think its wrong to DISMISS the subject of ufo's out of hand. These objects have defied analysis for decades. 21.5% Of ufo cases were unexplained, compared to the 9% not enough data. These craft defy our modern technology, and it should be more throughly investigated by neutral scientists, like ted acworth, not kitakaze,

I think nothing more needs to be added.
 
I think nothing more needs to be added.
Yeah. This is the most one-sided debate on the face of the internet. Makaya has fully, completely, and entirely pwned himself. There's nothing at all to post about now, except to point out that there's no reason to post anymore.

Makaya, after much hard work and at least a few weeks of effort, you have come to earn this:

owned-shark.jpg
 
I have no idea, kitz. Why dont you stop following me around and posting my posts to everyone else

I'm sorry, what? Why don't I stop quoting the posts of the kid making the wildy contradicting idiotic statements in the section of the forum that I most participate in for three years now? Make you a deal don't post about Bigfoot, aliens, etc in the GS&P. Post in the 9/11 sub-forum and I promise you won't see me there using your own words to show the depth of your ignorance, 'kay? Not very manly for an 18 year old boy to whine.

And I suppose that means you have no sincere answer for showing the ridiculous contradiction of your arguments about alien life and alien visitation?
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, what? Why don't I stop quoting the posts of the kid making the wildy contradicting idiotic statements in the section of the forum that I most participate in for three years now? Make you a deal don't post about Bigfoot, aliens, etc in the GS&P. Post in the 9/11 sub-forum and I promise you won't see me there using your own words to show the depth of your ignorance, 'kay? Not very manly for an 18 year old boy to whine.

And I suppose that means you have no sincere answer for showing the ridiculous contradiction of your arguments about alien life and alien visitation?

You appear to take great interest in monitoring my every move. Why dont i give you all of my personal info out to you, so then you can stalk me?
 
I'd just like to say well done to Makaya325 and give him credit for actually taking on-board what a majority of posters have put forward and seeing that the original premise was a bit too far-fetched. It takes a lot of courage to change one's position, even when a much more robust opposing position is presented . I wish we'd see a little more of it in the 9/11 conspiracy forum.
 
I'd just like to say well done to Makaya325 and give him credit for actually taking on-board what a majority of posters have put forward and seeing that the original premise was a bit too far-fetched. It takes a lot of courage to change one's position, even when a much more robust opposing position is presented . I wish we'd see a little more of it in the 9/11 conspiracy forum.

Thank you. Yet kitz appears to have some kind of grudge on me and monitors my posting, unlike any other member. Definition of a stalker=see kitz
 
I'd just like to say well done to Makaya325 and give him credit for actually taking on-board what a majority of posters have put forward and seeing that the original premise was a bit too far-fetched. It takes a lot of courage to change one's position, even when a much more robust opposing position is presented .
If that's what happened on this thread then fair enough credit is indeed due.
 
You appear to take great interest in monitoring my every move. Why dont i give you all of my personal info out to you, so then you can stalk me?

No, thank you. I'm not interested in teenage boys. Presenting the fallacies and contradictions of your posts is not stalking. I am only interested in countering poor arguments you make about Bigfoot and by extension aliens and UFO. Proof that I'm not interested instalking or badgering you is that you can see that for nearly the entire length of your alien life thread I did not participate. I only began to pariticipate regularly when you attempet to spin the argument into Bigfoot after someone presented you with the out to do so.

If you seriously think I may be stalking you on the board, there are two suggestions I have for you. Participate in a discussion in another part of the forum outside the GS&P or here in a topic that I'm not posting on. I vaguely recall seeing your handle beside an Obama related thread. Didn't see you there, didn't care. If something weird happens and you find me hounding you in parts of the forum outside the GS&P and alien/Bigfoot threads, you should make use of the report function and advise a moderator that you think I'm harrassing you. The forum is a big and organized place that has tools in place to help your experience here. The common theme I find with you, makaya, is that you make baseless claims and don't substantiate them. This I think is but one example.
 

Back
Top Bottom