Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
GT/CS said:
Please clarify what you are trying to point out.
Click to expand...

Kitz presented 6 photos. I was pointing out the skeleton of bob h in his jacket next to patty's skeleton's arms. I notice that patty's arms are incredibly longer than bobs, therefore, if the suit dont fit, you full of ****
 
Longtabber wrote:
SweatyYeti wrote:

"Analysis" by way of 'unsupported personal opinion' has no value........
Click to expand...


AGREED, thats why I assign your analysis as somewhere between null and zero.
Click to expand...



Where is the substantive support of your opinion, regarding "the value of my analysis", LT?

According to what you just agreed to.....your opinion (as stated.....unsupported) HAS NO VALUE. ;)


What a laugh!
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
Longtabber wrote:


AGREED, thats why I assign your analysis as somewhere between null and zero.
Click to expand...



Where is the substantive support of your opinion, regarding "the value of my analysis", LT?

According to what you just agreed to.....your opinion (as stated.....unsupported) HAS NO VALUE. ;)


What a laugh![/QUOTE]


Ahh, opines from a mental midget

>>>Where is the substantive support of your opinion, regarding "the value of my analysis", LT?

Troll, I told you where to look now get off your lazy obfuscating, non challenging, totally wrong and incapable/incompetent azz and start reading.

I'm not doing your work for you. You post idiotic nonsensical easily refutable nonsense as if it "deserves" some kind of audience and consideration. Heres your newsflash, it doesnt.

You have been refuted, corrected, challenged dozens of times and all you do is sit in your puddle and piddle while recycling crap as if that means something.

You either are another Makaya or even worse. Your meaningless drivel and circular arguments ( while always avoiding answering direct uestions with direct answers) is your way of just stirring the pot with absolutely nothing of any legitimate value to contribute.

Then there are the bad points
 
Aepervius wrote:
We can't really prove a negative (aka: it wasn't a real animal)
Click to expand...


How about proving, or demonstrating, a POSITIVE, Aepervius?.....like showing that Patty POSITIVELY could be replicated with a massively-padded suit?

What's the problem??

There's word going around that Patty is a cheap, off-the-shelf, crappy suit......yet nobody seems to have a clue as to how to replicate even ONE of the ambiguous aspects of her "cheap suit"....such as 'moving calf muscles', 'moving toes', moving thigh muscles', and 'a bulge that appears on the thigh, and then a second later doesn't re-appear while the thigh is rippling in the very same area'.

Maybe if you tried thinking POSITIVELY, Aepervius, you could actually replicate one of those movements........just stuff a little padding inside of your pant-leg, and show us how it...

MOOOOOOOO.....
cow2.jpg
........OOOOVES!! :D
 
Last edited:
Longtabber wrote:
Troll, I told you where to look now get off your lazy obfuscating, non challenging, totally wrong and incapable/incompetent azz and start reading.

I'm not doing your work for you.
Click to expand...


It's not "my work" to refute my own analysis, LT.

Again....if you see something specifically wrong with what I've posted, then feel free to show exactly where the error is.

I'm not saying that you're obligated to do this...I'm only saying that without supporting your statements, the statements are meaningless.
And, if you prefer to post meaningless statements, then, by all means.....go right ahead. It matters not to me....it's a free world!
 
SweatyYeti said:
Longtabber wrote:



It's not "my work" to refute my own analysis, LT.

Again....if you see something specifically wrong with what I've posted, then feel free to show exactly where the error is.

I'm not saying that you're obligated to do this...I'm only saying that without supporting your statements, the statements are meaningless.
And, if you prefer to post meaningless statements, then, by all means.....go right ahead. It matters not to me....it's a free world!
Click to expand...

oh gee, the argument from denial, tell you what you do troll- give me a bulleted recap of your nonsense and I'll drive the stake thru its heart ( again)
 
Longtabber wrote:
and all you do is sit in your puddle and piddle
Click to expand...


OOOOOOOOOH......I piddled in a puddle....just the other day....then I paddled in the puddle, where I piddled....just the other day. Then I paddled with a poodle...in the puddle, where I piddled.....just the other day.....And then....believe it or not....I peddled thru the puddle, with a poodle, and a paddle, in the puddle where I piddled......why....JUST the other day! :D
 
SweatyYeti said:
Longtabber wrote:



OOOOOOOOOH......I piddled in a puddle....just the other day....then I paddled in the puddle, where I piddled....just the other day. Then I paddled with a poodle...in the puddle, where I piddled.....just the other day.....And then....believe it or not....I peddled thru the puddle, with a poodle, and a paddle, in the puddle where I piddled......why....JUST the other day! :D
Click to expand...

Thats not bad considering thats the best you have.
 
SweatyYeti said:
OOOOOOOOOH......I piddled in a puddle....just the other day....then I paddled in the puddle, where I piddled....just the other day. Then I paddled with a poodle...in the puddle, where I piddled.....just the other day.....And then....believe it or not....I peddled thru the puddle, with a poodle, and a paddle, in the puddle where I piddled......why....JUST the other day! :D
Click to expand...

Thanks Sweaty, as usual your comments sound like they're directly from a children's book.

RayG
 
On a more serious note...I just came across this...courtesy of Lu, over on the Mid-America Board, concerning Patty's exceptionally long arms...

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]W: Describe it to me, Bob.[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Bob: It was a large hairy creature with arms that hang down beside its, you know, far down on its sides, below its knees, and it was quite ..[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]W: Do you agree with that?[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Roger: No, I think Bob's a little excited here, I don't believe they were below the knees, they were above the knees.[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]W: But they were well down on the sides, weren't they?[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Bob: Way down, right. [/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]W: And I could see that on the film tonight, they were well down on the sides.[/FONT]
Click to expand...


Here's the link to the full interview transcript....the interview was given in November 1967...

http://www.bigfootencounters.com/interviews/radiopatterson.htm


The interesting thing about Roger and Bob saying that Patty had extremely long arms is....why would they have described them that way, if Patty's arms were actually the SAME length as Bob Heironimus' arms??

Even the interviewer says that Patty's arms are exceptionally long.


The fact of the matter is....to most everyone....Patty's arms do look longer in proportion to the body than an average human's arms do.

But it's not necessarily due to an extreme length from the fingertips to the shoulders, but rather, it may be they appear extra-long due to an unusually short distance from the fingertips to the feet......or, a combination of the two, together.
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
.....like showing that Patty POSITIVELY could be replicated with a massively-padded suit?

What's the problem??
Click to expand...
I'm sure you'll find one (a problem that is) - but here's proof of a couple of suits under construction that alter body proportions and show musculature.

Sculpt-1.jpg


I suspect SY, that when you think of 'padding' you conjure up a vision of some sort of crude stuffing, not the carefully sculpted pieces above.
 
Last edited:
JohnWS said:
I'm sure you'll find one (a problem that is) - but here's proof of a couple of suits under construction that alter body proportions and show musculature.

[qimg]http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h72/John_WS/JREF/Sculpt-1.jpg[/qimg]

I suspect SY, that when you think of 'padding' you conjure up a vision of some sort of crude stuffing, not the carefully sculpted pieces above.
Click to expand...

Nice sculpture work but bear in mind that any discussion of the PGF has to be predicated by the fact that it was made in 1967. Those suits while seemingly of an advanced design are like comparing the V2 with the Saturn V or a P-40 with an F-16.
 
The interesting thing about Roger and Bob saying that Patty had extremely long arms is......
Click to expand...
The interesting thing is, how you make stuff up ...
Bob is saying they hung below the knee and Roger is correcting him..

The fact of the matter is, in the frames where we see Bob, urrh, uhh, Patty standing straight and tall, the tips of the hands reach exactly where you would expect them to..

Work some of your crayola magic on the back shots at the end of the film ..
 
Diogenes said:
The interesting thing is, how you make stuff up ...
Bob is saying they hung below the knee and Roger is correcting him..

The fact of the matter is, in the frames where we see Bob, urrh, uhh, Patty standing straight and tall, the tips of the hands reach exactly where you would expect them to..

Work some of your crayola magic on the back shots at the end of the film ..
Click to expand...

Not at all. Bob has short stubby arms, while patty has long monkey arms
 
Crowlogic said:
Nice sculpture work but bear in mind that any discussion of the PGF has to be predicated by the fact that it was made in 1967. Those suits while seemingly of an advanced design are like comparing the V2 with the Saturn V or a P-40 with an F-16.
Click to expand...
The sculptures (not suits) are in clay, likely over a plaster support. Both available in '67. Please expand on you objections.
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
It's just too bad that Patty never straightens up...all this folderol about long arms would never have gotten started. Damn you Patterson! Too clever by half..
Click to expand...

Ha, if I were wearing big floppy slippers while trying to walk over unfamiliar terrain I'd keep my head down the whole time, too!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom