I don't think (and I'm sure that there are many here that would also agree) truthers are interested in the truth, because if they were they would be trying their utmost to provide KSM's lawyers with the evidence that would stand up in a (very) public court of law. They have the best chance possible of convincing the world that 9/11 was an inside job by providing over-riding evidence that this was the case and freeing an innocent man as well. i wonder why they don't do this? /scratches fake beard.
Truthers really aren't interested in the truth or the law or whatever, they are interested in themselves, whether it be a sense of superiority, purpose, anti-authority, striving for fame or recognition, etc or just plain money making.
Most of them wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the posterior. They aren't seeking answers they are just seeking conformation for what they already believe. No amount of demonstration is going to change them. 2+2=73.98673 in their world and no matter how much evidence is given by huge numbers of sources showing them that 2+2=4 they will refuse to either understand it or believe it. This has been shown numerously within the short time-frame that I have been on JREF.
They post ludicrous notions and yet when it has been proven that their original notion is unworkable they continue with their original idea. They are impossible to reason with for they have no ability to cast any doubt upon their own beliefs.
I'd like someone to prove me a) that they are willing to give evidence in court on behalf of KSM and his lawyers and b) accept that their ideas are either dismissed by KSM and his lawyers or do not hold up in court
so that they will then realise that their ideas are false and accept the alternative.
If they show otherwise then I will believe that 9/11 was indeed an inside job and support a new investigation.