Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

[LONGTABBER PE]

----------------------------------

For me, it's hard to refute what is on the film itself....it tells an entirely different story than what has been made public.

Bobbie, I'm not sure we are referring to the same things but I agree with that statement 100%.

I also agree that someone needs to step up and answer some hard and pointed questions regarding the PGF.

 

[Skeptical Greg]

Speaking of MK and others who have studied the film, has anyone seen Leroy Blevins' revelations?

Gimlin hiding behind a tree

I like the way people pull stuff like that out of their aspartame without stopping to think .. Those background trees are way beyond Patty, and if that bit of paradolia is Gimlin, he's probably at least 15 feet tall ..

 

[Crowlogic]

I like the way people pull stuff like that out of their aspartame without stopping to think .. Those background trees are way beyond Patty, and if that bit of paradolia is Gimlin, he's probably at least 15 feet tall ..

Its impossible to determine anything about size or distance in the PGF. Or so it is sooooo frequently mentioned around here. So how do you know that "those trees" in the backround are way beyond Patty? Show us some measurments. Have another hit of aspartame Greg.

That said I don't think that there are horses, Gimlins, or other animals in those woods. The only animal that's shown on that film is Patty. Which happens to be a real live Sasquatch.

 

[GT/CS]

I like the way people pull stuff like that out of their aspartame without stopping to think .. Those background trees are way beyond Patty, and if that bit of paradolia is Gimlin, he's probably at least 15 feet tall ..

And with Patty being so blurry how is Gimlin's face so clear?

There are some other gems on that guy's website regarding the PGF. He also has some odd observations about Noah's ark. He is the king of paradolia!

 

[JcR]

I was almost going to give This guy the Pareidolia award. It was a
toss up
If that is Gimlin in the bushes (among other things in there) it looks
like a "triangulation of crossfire." Poor Patty was having a bad hair day and
should have stayed home.

 

[makaya325]

Please reflect a moment. You are at a skeptic's forum. You offer a claim and no substantiation. How should it be received?

The damn photo i already posted here, with mclarin and patty

 

[bobbieshort]

Funny since you have never seen the film itself.

----------------------

You don't know what you're talking about.... not a clue.

 

[AtomicMysteryMonster]

Really this Dude
cRAZY Stuff.

Yep, that's the one! It turns out that it was brought up here in the Georgia Bigfoot thread.

Speaking of MK and others who have studied the film, has anyone seen Leroy Blevins' revelations?

Yes. I like the fact that he actually made his own Patty mask.

 

[bobbieshort]

I've uploaded two new stabilized film image sequences..., they are #'s 5 & 6 down from the top where Patty is observed falling forward, losing her balance...flailing her right arm in a struggle to stay upright...she goes down & then the film ends... That I know of, these are the first images where the footage has been examined towards the end of the film as opposed to much of the work done in and around frame 352. This is the second time she can be seen "losing it" - - because in an earlier sequence on the sandbar, she goes down, butt is all you see, but she gets upright again until where the film cuts off in the new uploaded demonstration..., so again my point is, if this is Heironimus....let us take a hard look at his back and right thigh....and ask how he got out of that sandbar and into what medical facility??

 

[JcR]

Yep, that's the one! It turns out that it was brought up here in the Georgia Bigfoot thread.

I didn't even see it in there. Must of been too busy with this thing.
I should mail a shovel to Art Bell.

 

[xblade]

I've uploaded two new stabilized film image sequences..., they are #'s 5 & 6 down from the top where Patty is observed falling forward, losing her balance...flailing her right arm in a struggle to stay upright...she goes down & then the film ends... That I know of, these are the first images where the footage has been examined towards the end of the film as opposed to much of the work done in and around frame 352. This is the second time she can be seen "losing it" - - because in an earlier sequence on the sandbar, she goes down, butt is all you see, but she gets upright again until where the film cuts off in the new uploaded demonstration..., so again my point is, if this is Heironimus....let us take a hard look at his back and right thigh....and ask how he got out of that sandbar and into what medical facility??

This is the kind of nonsense that makes me bristle...well, as much as anything bigfoot-related can make me bristle.

And you wonder why some would call you a believer....

 

[William Parcher]

Her right arm flailing to maintain balance & keep going.... but she goes down...

 

[bobbieshort]

This is the kind of nonsense that makes me bristle...well, as much as anything bigfoot-related can make me bristle.

And you wonder why some would call you a believer....

-------------

I'd be interested to know what you see then....?????
Tell me what's on that film, offer another plausible explanation....

 

[JohnWS]

so again my point is, if this is Heironimus....let us take a hard look at his back and right thigh....and ask how he got out of that sandbar and into what medical facility??

If this is anybody in a suit, surely the 'bullet hit's' (which I can't see) are far more likely to be as fabricated and manufactured as the suit? What possible, logical reason could there be for supposing someone would fire live ammunition at the 'Leading Man'?

I do think your website is a great resource by the way .

 

[AtomicMysteryMonster]

I've uploaded two new stabilized film image sequences..., they are #'s 5 & 6 down from the top where Patty is observed falling forward, losing her balance...flailing her right arm in a struggle to stay upright...she goes down & then the film ends... That I know of, these are the first images where the footage has been examined towards the end of the film as opposed to much of the work done in and around frame 352. This is the second time she can be seen "losing it" - - because in an earlier sequence on the sandbar, she goes down, butt is all you see, but she gets upright again until where the film cuts off in the new uploaded demonstration..., so again my point is, if this is Heironimus....let us take a hard look at his back and right thigh....and ask how he got out of that sandbar and into what medical facility??

Let me see if I can nail this without even looking at those images...does the "on all fours" .gif mentioned here show what you're talking about? If so, things are not as they seem. Also, why do you still push the shooting theory after being told that bullet impacts wouldn't look like what's seen in those images? Did you find a (non-Patty) video or pictures showing otherwise or did you just forget?

 

[mangler]

...flailing her right arm in a struggle to stay upright...she goes down & then the film ends...

I have added another frame, maybe, someone can explain to me precisely where the subject goes down and where the film ends? For something that keeps getting hit with lead it moves pretty normal.

http://manglertestsite.vndv.com/gif4.html


m

 

[GT/CS]

Bobbie, are you claiming a bigfoot was shot in the PGF or someone in a suit was shot?

 

[bobbieshort]

Bobbie, are you claiming a bigfoot was shot in the PGF or someone in a suit was shot?

--------------------
I am NOT claiming anything. It appears to me (my opinion is NOT a claim) that there is a high probability the subject in the Patterson film affectionately known as "Patty" (be it Heironimus OR Sasquatch) was, in my opinion, shot, yes in the back....and in the leg... and elsewhere.

 

[GT/CS]

--------------------
I am NOT claiming anything. It appears to me (my opinion is NOT a claim) that there is a high probability the subject in the Patterson film affectionately known as "Patty" (be it Heironimus OR Sasquatch) was, in my opinion, shot, yes in the back....and in the leg... and elsewhere.

If it is a guy in a suit then the film most likely just shows a poorly-fitting suit flapping around. A bullet impact is not required to make such movements.

If something was really shot a few times it would need to be a bigfoot, but there are so many facts that point to Patty being a guy in a suit that the bigfoot possibility is nil.

Since it must be a guy in a suit there are no bullet impacts. It's just a guy trying his best to walk in a hot, poorly-fitting suit, with big slippers. Also, have you noticed how the creature is hunched forward, looking at the ground? Animals don't do that.

Bob wasn't shot. If he stumbled it was because he got hot and tired and those big slippers finally got the better of him. Frankly, I'm amazed at how far he walked before he bit it!

 

[kitakaze]

The damn photo i already posted here, with mclarin and patty

It's fun watching you trying to squirm out of addressing a simple mathmatical measurement that takes Patty's own casts and shows her to be the exact same height as Bob Heironimus. Your own defense just screwed you. It shows Patty quite shorter than McClarin.

After both frames were successfully registered it seems that the camera positions were VERY close since the background and foreground objects could be matched up. So if the camera positions were in sync then the only unknown is whether they followed the exact same path. If they did then the following would be a valid comparison. (click to animate?)