• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Óðinn,

I didn’t try to force anything, I didn’t go the distance, I didn't have to (it’s a frickin hack-job for cryin out loud), the problem/information screamed at me instantly. It has nothing to do with the A-ratio, motion and/or R-analysis, don’t be so analytical when you look at the images and you’ll see it.

BTW, I don’t think any of the frames are suitable for more than a half-assed (hack) analysis.

Show us wise one, less talk more action, let’s see some of that high-end crap. Come-on Yoda, extract some information from the images and make Edouard proud.

Later, cocktail time.


m
 
Last edited:
Óðinn,

I didn’t try to force anything, I didn’t go the distance, I didn't have to (it’s a frickin hack-job for cryin out loud), the problem/information screamed at me instantly. It has nothing to do with the A-ratio, motion and/or R-analysis, don’t be so analytical when you look at the images and you’ll see it.

BTW, I don’t think any of the frames are suitable for more than a half-assed (hack) analysis.

Show us wise one, less talk more action, let’s see some of that high-end crap. Come-on Yoda, extract some information from the images and make Edouard proud.
Later, cocktail time.


m

Have a beer on me. GF is long on the mouth and short on production like I said earlier. He likes to talk in circles and obfuscate a lot.

I learned early on he likes to push his agenda in spite of the truth.
 
Yes, he was. Crazy Texas guy. It came via a political news feature. I'm out the door. I bet Atomic will find it first.
 
Better question: Why haven't you and all the other believers who think there is a family of sasquatch buried at Bluff Creek swarmed the area yourselves to finally gather the missing piece of legitimate evidence that has eluded believers since the bigfoot story began? You could make history, and stick it to us skeptics at the same time.

-----------
There is so much I do not adhere too....that being called "a believer" makes me bristle.....you know, really...I don't want to make history nor do I want to stick it to anyone....I just prefer to stay out people's way for the most part....

It would be nice though....if someone would step up to the plate and account for what's on the film........ it tells a different story.
 
I haven't seen anywhere Bobbie advocating MK's clan slaughter, but rather just Patty. I may be wrong in that she does support the idea. The question remains valid in that we are told that P&G buried something and that the buried something is in a location that might be discerned with effort.
----------------------------------
Thanks for that...you know I don't want to debate ad hominem about MK or with anyone working on the film. People are entitled to their opinions. It's hard to argue semantics with MK, he has such a command of optics...physical properties of adjusting light in film to bring out detail...self taught perhaps but a master at what he does. Right or wrong, why fault a guy for his opinion?

Maybe I understand it better because I had the advantage of seeing the very same work done by another person some years back...he was looking at the film to see if he could determine if it was a man-in-a-suit or just what..He contacted me through the website to ask my opinion about Patty, saying that Patty had been shot. At the time of that contact, I was busy, energies were scattered; I thought the man must be a nutcase. Funny how we are fed little bits of information at a time, even then we're not ready to accept it...anyway this guy presented details of the Pat film I never heard about before...so none of this is new to me. I regret blowing that man off & losing contact with him. Big mistake. Then along comes MK Davis with the same information, same images. This time, I paid attention to the images. I agree with MK on "some" things, other points I wrestle with and some interpretations we simply agree to disagree.

For me, it's hard to refute what is on the film itself....it tells an entirely different story than what has been made public.
 
----------------------------------
Thanks for that...you know I don't want to debate ad hominem about MK or with anyone working on the film. People are entitled to their opinions. It's hard to argue semantics with MK, he has such a command of optics...physical properties of adjusting light in film to bring out detail...self taught perhaps but a master at what he does. Right or wrong, why fault a guy for his opinion?

Maybe I understand it better because I had the advantage of seeing the very same work done by another person some years back...he was looking at the film to see if he could determine if it was a man-in-a-suit or just what..He contacted me through the website to ask my opinion about Patty, saying that Patty had been shot. At the time of that contact, I was busy, energies were scattered; I thought the man must be a nutcase. Funny how we are fed little bits of information at a time, even then we're not ready to accept it...anyway this guy presented details of the Pat film I never heard about before...so none of this is new to me. I regret blowing that man off & losing contact with him. Big mistake. Then along comes MK Davis with the same information, same images. This time, I paid attention to the images. I agree with MK on "some" things, other points I wrestle with and some interpretations we simply agree to disagree.

For me, it's hard to refute what is on the film itself....it tells an entirely different story than what has been made public.

Funny since you have never seen the film itself.
 
I like this creepy little thingy with a funky big ear. Kinda looks like he is squatting down.




A few more strong coffees and I'll find alien poop to.

With a little liberty on my own I enhanced this poopin Alien
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom