• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

makaya325 is too young to remember the original Monty Python skits, like this modified Cheese Shop sketch:

Bigfoot Evidence by makaya325

(Skeptic walks in the door)

Skeptic: Good Morning.

makaya325: Good morning, Sir.

Skeptic: Ah, thank you, my good man.

makaya325: What can I do for you, Sir?

Skeptic: I want to see some bigfoot evidence.

makaya325: (lustily) Certainly, sir. What would you like?

Skeptic: Well, eh, how about a few footprints?

makaya325: I'm, afraid I'm fresh out of footprints, sir.

Skeptic: Oh, never mind, how are you on photos?

makaya325: I'm afraid I never have those at the end of the week, sir, I'll get some fresh on Monday.

Skeptic: Tish tish. No matter. Well, four ounces of bigfoot blood, if you please.

makaya325: Ah! It's beeeen on order, sir, for two weeks. Was expecting it this morning.

Skeptic: 'T's Not my lucky day, is it? Aah, vocalizations?

makaya325: Sorry, sir.

Skeptic: Hairs?

makaya325: Normally, sir, yes. Today I've misplaced them.

Skeptic: Ah. Reliable witness reports?

makaya325: Sorry.

Skeptic: Fingerprints?

makaya325: (pause) No.

Skeptic: Scat, perhaps?

makaya325: Ah! I have scat, yessir.

Skeptic: (suprised) You do! Excellent.

makaya325: Yessir. It's..ah,.....it's a bit runny...

Skeptic: Oh, I like it runny.

makaya325: Well,.. It's very runny, actually, sir.

Skeptic: No matter. Fetch hither the sewage de la Grande Sasquatch! Mmmwah!

makaya325: I...think it's a bit runnier than you'll like it, sir.

Skeptic: I don't care how f***ing runny it is. Hand it over with all speed.

makaya325: Oooooooooohhh........! (pause)

Skeptic: What now?

makaya325: The cat's eaten it.

Skeptic: (pause) Has he.

makaya325: She, sir.

Skeptic: You...do *have* some evidence, don't you?

makaya325: (brightly) Of course, sir. I've got--

Skeptic: No no... don't tell me. I'm keen to guess.

makaya325: Fair enough.

Skeptic: Bigfoot nests?

makaya325: Not *today*, sir, no.

Skeptic: Links to factual information or reliable evidence?

makaya325: I've never considered links necessary sir.

Skeptic: (pause) Aah, how about some DNA results?

makaya325: Well, I don't get much call for that around here, sir.

Skeptic: Not much ca-- it's the single most supportive evidence in the world!

makaya325: Not 'round here, sir.

Skeptic: (slight pause) and what IS the most supportive evidence 'round hyah?

makaya325: No dead cougar or bear bones, sir.

Skeptic: I see.

Owner: Oh, yes, it's very rare for a hunter to find any cougar or bear bones.

Skeptic: I see. Uuh...the lack of cougar and bear bones, eh?

makaya325: Right, sir.

Skeptic: All right. Okay. 'Have you got any bigfoot bones?' he asked, expecting the answer 'no'.

makaya325: I'll have a look, sir........nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnno.

Skeptic: You're not much of a bigfoot researcher, are you?

makaya325: Finest in the district!

Skeptic: (annoyed) Explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please.

makaya325: Well, I have a microscope, sir!

Skeptic: It's certainly uncontaminated by evidence....

makaya325: (brightly) You haven't asked me about definitive proof, sir.

Skeptic: Would it be worth it?

makaya325: Could be....

Skeptic: (slowly) Have you got any definitive proof?

makaya325: No.

Skeptic: Figures. Predictable, really I suppose. It was an act of purest optimism to have posed the question in the first place. Tell me:

makaya325: Yessir?

Skeptic: (deliberately) Have you in fact got any evidence here at all?

makaya325: Yes, sir.

Skeptic: Really?

(pause)

makaya325: No. Not really, sir.

Skeptic: You haven't.

makaya325: Nosir. Not a scrap. I was deliberately wasting your time, sir.

Skeptic: Of that I have no doubt.

:D

RayG


That was hilarious! I just had a mental picture of me behind a desk with the slow voice:D
 
I just knew you would quote that entire post just to make a short comment. For so long we wanted you to use quotes. Now you need to learn when not to use them.
 
I will be convinced if 100's of biologists look for it day in and out for years, covering every inch of Na, and if they dont find it, then i will accept it doesnt exist

Look for what? Descriptions of bigfoot vary. What evidence there is, is inconsistent. Would they just look for a generic "hairy biped"? Who is going to pay for this search? There's a lot of money being made by some footers, but I don't see them mounting any such searches.

Besides, we don't even mount such a search for rare creatures that we know exist. Such as looking for mountain lions in areas where they aren't supposed to be anymore...
 
Looked? Your joking? No serious expeditions have been created to look. Sure, wildlife surveying is done, but generally in small areas.

Liar/ADD/troll - take your pick.

You've been given more than ample examples of serious expeditions.

It has more to do with debunkers not looking than bf being intelligent. For every deer found dead, tell me, how many arent?

Debunkers have a better chance of finding Bigfoot than proponents?

Only 2 bear picks? How many years were they seperated?

There were three. You've seen more. Here's four:




 
I will be convinced if 100's of biologists look for it day in and out for years, covering every inch of Na, and if they dont find it, then i will accept it doesnt exist

So in other words you'll never believe that Bigfoot doesn't exist, at least now I know for certain there's no point in entertaining the thought you're not a troll.
 
makaya325 said:
I will be convinced if 100's of biologists look for it day in and out for years, covering every inch of Na, and if they dont find it, then i will accept it doesnt exist
Do you really think one must actually be looking for a breeding population of 2.5- to 3m-high apes to find them?
Do you really think people working say, with mosses or marmots at bigfoot country would miss the evidence if it existed?

BTW, I seem to recall ou saying they were extinct...
 
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/484965/bear_chasing_sheep/

How about a Bipedal ape, trying to outrun a grizzly bear?

The much-touted Bigfoot/Grizzly battles would be so one sided that I would laugh. Those who think Bigfoot would somehow pull a Tristan Ludlow on a 1000 lb. Grizzly, are dreamers.

Watch as this grizzly shoves it into gear and runs down this ram like the ram is standing still.
 
Last edited:
I will be convinced if 100's of biologists look for it day in and out for years, covering every inch of Na, and if they dont find it, then i will accept it doesnt exist

Who's going to pay for this phenomenal waste of time and resources?
 
Do you really think one must actually be looking for a breeding population of 2.5- to 3m-high apes to find them?
Do you really think people working say, with mosses or marmots at bigfoot country would miss the evidence if it existed?

BTW, I seem to recall ou saying they were extinct...

2.5 m tall solitary apes? Yep, you betcha
 
Bigfoot is solitary, until you shoot one, then they come out of the woodwork to avenge the death, and to carry off the body for proper burial. I've seen plenty O' sasquatch movies. Sasquatch Mountain comes to mind.
 
Bigfoot is solitary, until you shoot one, then they come out of the woodwork to avenge the death, and to carry off the body for proper burial. I've seen plenty O' sasquatch movies. Sasquatch Mountain comes to mind.

Have you noticed that at least half of all Sasquatch movies seem to have Lance Henriksen in them?
 

Back
Top Bottom