• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Status
Not open for further replies.
September 11th 1977?
3sfiremen4t.jpg

Yes there has always been nano nano technology ask these guys!
In your specific case it does not matter!
 
Last edited:
GiE, you may be the most naive, credulous person I've ever come across here. Why not pose my questions to Jones and Ryan, and have them submit all their methods and results, with their comparisons to known "normal" paint samples? They won't respond to me.

You won't, because you're afraid of the answers.

As for the primer composition, your reading comprehension is lacking. I told you where to find it.

Good luck with your troubles.
 
JoeyDonuts said:
It appears that GiE has fallen back on the ULTIMA1 strategy. When whatever it was you were hiding behind claiming "science" gets utterly torn apart, use one-sentence juvenile insults exclusively.

Although in terms of posts/day, U1 had you creamed hands down. Better get on that.
Click to expand...

Yes. speacilly when the you and the outher beleivers attack and insult poeple for no reason then they disagree with you.
 
Gravy said:
GiE, you may be the most naive, credulous person I've ever come across here. Why not pose my questions to Jones and Ryan, and have them submit all their methods and results, with their comparisons to known "normal" paint samples? They won't respond to me.

You won't, because you're afraid of the answers.

As for the primer composition, your reading comprehension is lacking. I told you where to find it.

Good luck with your troubles.
Click to expand...

yea they dont respond to many people including me as they get thousands of emails a day according to judy shelton from ae911truth who actually responds.
but im asking a favour dude cmon
 
beachnut said:
September 11th 1977?
Yes there has always been nano nano technology ask these guys!
In your specific case it does not matter!
Click to expand...

not sure if this is a joke or not but im referring to the construction of the wtc with its paint which is before nanotech,
was finished in 1966
 
GodisEnergy said:
the source is the video of the towers collapsing
Click to expand...

I assume then, that you have experience in analyzing videos of structural collapse and determining exactly what portions of debris came from what objects? And also how much weight the particulate matter may or may not have added to the floors it came from?

What exactly do you think happened to all of the walls, furniture, decor, carpeting, appliances, people, glass, doors, and everything else that occupied the spaces between the floors whenever the pancaking collapse started? Where did all of that material go?

You know, ULTIMA1 had you beaten in posts per day, but you may very well be his equal in sheer obtuseness.
 
dtugg said:
I am sure that you can prove all that dust came from concrete. I await my pwning. Begin.
Click to expand...

nah i didnt say that all the dust was concrete, there were alot of other materials , unexploded thermite,iron spheres etc ;)

But whered did the concrete go , i havent seen any intact concrete in the rubble just steel and dust.
 
GodisEnergy said:
nah i didnt say that all the dust was concrete, there were alot of other materials , unexploded thermite,iron spheres etc ;)

But whered did the concrete go , i havent seen any intact concrete in the rubble just steel and dust.
Click to expand...

But you said that the proof that all the concrete was pulverized (by this I assume you mean turned to dust) was in the collapse videos. How does therm*te pulverize concrete anyway? Especially without creating a huge amount of bright light?

What do you mean by intact concrete? Do you mean large pieces? I've seen plenty of of pictures of those. Your failure to find any is indicative of nothing except for your horrible research skills.

Please offer proof that any significant portion of the concrete was turned to dust. This doesn't mean "look at the collapse videos," and "I've never seen any photos of intact concrete."

Oh, and thermite doesn't explode. Thanks for proving once again that you haven't the slightest idea of what you are talking about.
 
Last edited:
GodisEnergy said:
nah i didnt say that all the dust was concrete, there were alot of other materials , unexploded thermite,iron spheres etc ;)

But whered did the concrete go , i havent seen any intact concrete in the rubble just steel and dust.
Click to expand...

Post #100. Those are concrete slabs embedded with the steel truss support structure. They're pretty deformed but if you understand anything at all about the floor construction of WTC it's not that hard to see it.
 
Last edited:
JoeyDonuts said:
Post #100. Those are concrete slabs embedded with the steel truss support structure. They're pretty deformed but if you understand anything at all about the floor construction of WTC it's not that hard to see it.
Click to expand...

looks like unrusted iron to me.
 
GodisEnergy said:
looks like unrusted iron to me.
Click to expand...

It would not be too difficult to determine it to be concrete. As for the rust bands on it, when the rebar, or the corrugated metal sheet contained in the floor system rusts, some of it "stains" and runs off onto the concrete over time. These are a few examples, albeit a bit less extreme than seen in the photo on post #100:

LINK 1
Link 2
link 3
 
GodisEnergy said:
But whered did the concrete go , i havent seen any intact concrete in the rubble just steel and dust.
Click to expand...

Then you haven't looked very hard. There are many photos of GZ available clearly showing large lumps of concrete. At the top of this forum are some links to 9/11 CT debunking resources. Try them out.

Meanwhile, just as a taste :

concreteremains1.jpg


concreteremains2.jpg


Even the small grains you can see here are much bigger than the "powder" or "dust" that would justify the description "pulverised".

GodisEnergy - do you take every claim you make here directly from CT websites? Do you ever research anything for yourself, just to verify that your claims are true ?
 
You know what is amazing? We have told each and every truther that comes here, that the WTCs were FULL, CHAULKED (no pun intended) FULL, of Wallboard. Now you know what wallboard would make if "pulverized"?

That's right children, a fine particulate DUST!!!!

TAM:)
 
What special kind of idiot would NOT expect to see a huge amount of fine dust particles in the collapses due to the huge amount of drywall in those towers, and automatically assume that because it was there it HAD to be the concrete being 'pulverized'?
 
twinstead said:
What special kind of idiot would NOT expect to see a huge amount of fine dust particles in the collapses due to the huge amount of drywall in those towers, and automatically assume that because it was there it HAD to be the concrete being 'pulverized'?
Click to expand...


A Truther Idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom