Crazytimes
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 348
I don't see a plane in that video and if it is a plane, it must be military and not commercial.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Surveilance cameras and resolution
- Thread starter leftysergeant
- Start date
Or perhaps someone contains an excessive amount of #2.
Above (your photo from april 2001?) - These are protesters who lack knowledge on 911. After a little research and using logic and sound judgment the group becomes much more descriptive of their evidence.
This is the reality of the impact of 911Truth on the world.
Where are you hiding that "ample evidence" to support your mindless cult mantra "911 was an inside job"?
hmmm....so they had those investigate 9/11 shirts done up, etc.... within the first three months after the attacks did they?
I doubt it. I would wager good money that that picture was NOT TAKEN in 2001.
I am guessing 2006. I would need independent verification from the photographer and the photo participants before I would believe that is a 2001 photo.
TAM
edit: and regardless of the year that was taken, there is no proof it is a photo from a digital camera versus a scanned photo from a SLR.
In every way, as usual, another truther FAILS!!!
I doubt it. I would wager good money that that picture was NOT TAKEN in 2001.
I am guessing 2006. I would need independent verification from the photographer and the photo participants before I would believe that is a 2001 photo.
TAM
edit: and regardless of the year that was taken, there is no proof it is a photo from a digital camera versus a scanned photo from a SLR.
In every way, as usual, another truther FAILS!!!
Last edited:
DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
Not just 2001 but...image properties has this photo from a photobucket album titled "powertothepeople_2006"
no captions in the album, so how is it determined that this image, in anyway, was taken in 2001???
TAM
bold is mine.
Grizzly Bear
このマスクに&#
fitzgibbon
Master Poster
I have to take Tweeter's side a bit in this, JBA as the recording formats now aren't THAT much better than in 2001. What's changed is an awareness of what's lost just pitching video onto the Internet and let the compression gods take the hindmost. Add to that the fact that many of the videos 'analysed' by the likes of Ace Baker are so far removed from original video (not taking into account the shortcomings of the broadcast and cable signal path) and so pock-marked with compression issues and so much information having been thrown away in the interim that the word "analysis" is a misnomer when what they're doing with the footage they have.
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
None of the objects in that shot are traveling through the cameras field of view at 500 miles per hour.
In fact, there isn't anything there traveling at 50 miles per hour.
leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 18,863
And the camera was focused specificly on the twoofers and adjusted for the light levels at the target point.
The security cameras that caught Flt 77 and the ditching were adjusted to catch the best detail right in front of them.
The security cameras that caught Flt 77 and the ditching were adjusted to catch the best detail right in front of them.
HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 459
That chick in the front needs to make porn.
Something much more Productive than what she is doing right now.
Brainster
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 22,322
That photo is from August 2007 at the very earliest. The shirts are advertising Truther.org which was registered as a domain name on August 17, 2007.
He has been on ignore for 4-6 months now, but when people quote him, we can still see.
TAM
He has been on ignore for 4-6 months now, but when people quote him, we can still see.
TAM
Yes, but from my own experience, it stops the temptation to reply to the trolls.