• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's an "I know" from kitakaze:
I know Heironimus appears in footage for Patterson's film 'Bigfoot - America's Abominable Snowman' in May 1967 in what appears to be Yakima riding on Chico, leading another horse, and being followed by Jerry Merrit. I know that Gimlin was riding Heironimus' horse at Bluff Creek and didn't say anything until it was discovered and put to him long after he had a chance to say that Heironimus did have some connection to Bluff Creek. I know that Patterson appears on Heironimus' horse beside a wig wearing Bob Gimlin on the cover of Argosy magazine.

1. Wasn't the leader for a BBC production containing the Patty footage also labeled America's Abominable Snowman?

2. Where can one read the exact claims that Bob H. made?

Thanks.
 
makaya325 said:
Ty, I dont think people are as bad as society seems to believe. Judging size from 1000 ft isnt even bad, which i did judge someone from 1000ft, and i could determine if they were taller than me. How do you know that people are inaccurate, based on ambigious studies?
Click to expand...

makaya325 said:
It was cloudly out, temp. 50 f, clothing: t-shirt and jeans. I knew the size of the individual moving was bigger than me. It turned out, i was right, im 5ft 10 and the individual was 6ft 2.
Click to expand...

makaya325 said:
From 100's of yards, any human would look like a blur and size is impossible to judge. When we are dealing with reports when the animal is close, Then its harder to dismiss. Why cant we entertain the possibility that people are seeing something undiscovered, and do follow up on reports?
Click to expand...

What is your explanation for this obvious contradiction?
If you can differentiate 4 inches at 330 yards - why can't other people pull off this amazing feat?

Are you a liar?
 
rockinkt said:
What is your explanation for this obvious contradiction?
If you can differentiate 4 inches at 330 yards - why can't other people pull off this amazing feat?

Are you a liar?
Click to expand...

it was in an open field. No, not a liar, just saw a person walking
 
makaya325 said:
it was in an open field. No, not a liar, just saw a person walking
Click to expand...

Read everything in the post. At one point you were able to tell a difference of 4" at 1000 yards. In another sentence, you claim at 100's of yards size would be impossible to judge.

Which is it?

I'm sorry, I mistyped: 4" at 1000 feet (~330 yards)... the rest still stands.
 
Last edited:
So.... You can distinguish 4 inches from 1000 foot.

That is from 304.8 meter away you distinguish ~10 centimeter or 0.1 meter. Or to make it comparable, that is a difference of 1,0 mm from 3 meter (1/1000 inches from 3 inches away) if I am not making a mistake in numbers.

I have to bow down deeply and remove my hat. Or be incredulous.
 
manofthesea said:
Here's an "I know" from kitakaze:
I know Heironimus appears in footage for Patterson's film 'Bigfoot - America's Abominable Snowman' in May 1967 in what appears to be Yakima riding on Chico, leading another horse, and being followed by Jerry Merrit. I know that Gimlin was riding Heironimus' horse at Bluff Creek and didn't say anything until it was discovered and put to him long after he had a chance to say that Heironimus did have some connection to Bluff Creek. I know that Patterson appears on Heironimus' horse beside a wig wearing Bob Gimlin on the cover of Argosy magazine.

1. Wasn't the leader for a BBC production containing the Patty footage also labeled America's Abominable Snowman?

2. Where can one read the exact claims that Bob H. made?

Thanks.
Click to expand...


LOL. You've got all of that wrong. You don't even care about the historical facts. Do you post in other forums where you actually can know what you are talking about? You know... forums like "The Joy of Eating Oatmeal".

What in the world are you doing here at JREF? Oh yeah, you got chased by a Bigfoot when you were a kid and you need to testify now.
 
I think you're confused. The top part was quoted from kitakaze. You should address him. I asked two questions pertaining to his quote.
1. Wasn't the leader for the BBC production labeled AAS?
2. Where can I read BH's claims?

And yes, I'm the only person you've ever conversed with to have encountered a real bigfoot.
If you don't read the whole post and make at least a halfassed attempt at comprehending it, then you're just a troll.
 
Last edited:
manofthesea said:
I think you're confused. The top part was quoted from kitakaze. You should address him. I asked two questions pertaining to his quote.
Click to expand...

I think you're confused:

1. Wasn't the leader for the BBC production labeled AAS?
Click to expand...

What is the relevance for your question?

2. Where can I read BH's claims?
Click to expand...

Why do you try to get people to google for you? Are you lazy? Do it yourself.

And yes, I'm the only person you've ever conversed with to have encountered a real bigfoot.
If you don't read the whole post and make at least a halfassed attempt at comprehending it, then you're just a troll.
Click to expand...

Bf2006 and darkwing would tell you otherwise. Not only that, they've claimed to have seen Bigfoot more than you.
 
kitakaze said:
I think you're confused:



What is the relevance for your question?



Why do you try to get people to google for you? Are you lazy? Do it yourself.



Bf2006 and darkwing would tell you otherwise. Not only that, they've claimed to have seen Bigfoot more than you.
Click to expand...

Please don't bother me with your nonsense.
 
manofthesea said:
I think you're confused. The top part was quoted from kitakaze. You should address him. I asked two questions pertaining to his quote.
1. Wasn't the leader for the BBC production labeled AAS?
2. Where can I read BH's claims?

And yes, I'm the only person you've ever conversed with to have encountered a real bigfoot.
If you don't read the whole post and make at least a halfassed attempt at comprehending it, then you're just a troll.
Click to expand...

Bump. Let William Parcher address this if you don't mind.
 
manofthesea said:
Bump. Let William Parcher address this if you don't mind.
Click to expand...

I don't know if WP or anyone else can address what makes you think some of the things you do.

If there was a leader for a BBC production containing Patty footage entitled "America's Abominable Snowman", how does that address Bob Heironimus being in Patterson's film?

Why should WP google for you something as basic as BH's account? You google-tarded?

Why should WP address bf2006 and darkwing having better Bigfoot claims than you?
 
manofthesea said:
I think you're confused. The top part was quoted from kitakaze. You should address him. I asked two questions pertaining to his quote.
1. Wasn't the leader for the BBC production labeled AAS?
2. Where can I read BH's claims?

And yes, I'm the only person you've ever conversed with to have encountered a real bigfoot.
If you don't read the whole post and make at least a halfassed attempt at comprehending it, then you're just a troll.
Click to expand...


All that stuff is outdated. Patty was real and she got shot up. She was the last one so you didn't have a BF encounter.

The leader says "Big foot", but somebody may have chopped off the first part which might say "Killing the last.." BH's claims are in a book, in online media articles, in radio interviews, in forums including this one, and magazines. He can't be telling the truth cause he would be full of bullet holes.

You gotta pay attention.
 
kitakaze said:
If there was a leader for a BBC production containing Patty footage entitled "America's Abominable Snowman", how does that address Bob Heironimus being in Patterson's film?
Click to expand...

In my quote of your post (the one that sent you guys ballistic) it states that Honest Bob H. was in a May 67 production of RP's with the same title. It would seem likely that the cast of characters in the Patty production would be the same being that both productions have the same heading. (I'm sure the BBC prod. was titled America's something or other)
Not to mention the likelihood of an Oct. 67 film date for Patty seems unlikely to the improbability of developing, editing, etc. for the first showing.
And yes, I am googletarded, just a blue collar drop out, remember?

But that's just me. Where can I get some bigfoot glasses to see things the way you guys do?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom