(boldness added)
What post was I asked what evidence would I need to proven that another religion is true? As you can see I gave a highly detailed and lengthy response to the question what evidence would I need to be proven Christianity is false.
1. This one is particularly weird. Jefferson left the resurrection and other miracles out of his bible because he regarded them as nonsense, yet you regard the fact that he kept found a small portion of the NT worth keeping as evidence FOR your religion?
2. The Mormons and Scientologists can claim similar results.
3/4. If you don't accept scientific evidence you may as well say nothing could possibly convince you because your faith is independent of reason. St. Augustine saw the danger of placing scripture over science, too bad you can't.
5. This one is just a failure to be educated. History and myth are full of such stories, Christianity is hardly unique in this respect.
6. There are plenty of explanations for the empty tomb. You just reject all of them merely because they are different from YOUR explanation.
7. I'm sure there's a thread on prophecy around here somewhere. How many unfulfilled prophesies do you need to give up Christianity? Why just the Old Testament? Are you unwilling to examine the one by Jesus that he would return during the lifetime of his followers?
8. Is there a term for arguing from failure of education? Christianity's growth is also not unique.
DOC, it is clear that you are unwilling to be persuaded you're wrong, no matter the evidence. It's okay to say so. Many people do. It's not okay, however, to pretend you accept Christianity based on evidence when no counter evidence is acceptable.
Evidence that would convince me that Jesus DID rise from the dead would be a resurrection under controlled conditions (to prevent fraud) by, say, a Christian faith healer.