Please don't equate Salma Hayek with anything having to do with truthers.Oooooooh "airline denials" has such a salacious (look it up) ring to it!!!
Please don't equate Salma Hayek with anything having to do with truthers.Oooooooh "airline denials" has such a salacious (look it up) ring to it!!!
hahahahahaPlease don't equate Salma Hayek with anything having to do with truthers.
and wanted to create maximum impact and terror, why would they not choose flights that coincided with when the towers were full? Does anyone wonder whether there was a specific reason for choosing these particular flights?
Heh. Of all things you could credit OBL with, you choose the one thing that was an absolute certainty given the situation. As if there was a chance that those events wouldn't have been broadcast live if they had occurred at any other time of the day.![]()
And yet JihadJane seems incredulous to its authenticity, considering it part of "mass media manipulation".
What a shock.
I was impressed by the fact that the perpetrators got millions of people to watch their TV’s and then gave them a repeat, live, performance. It was a perfect psychological operation.
I am impressed that such paranoia exists as to take a horrific act that killed thousands, and turn it into a cheap Tom Clancy Novel.
impressed, but not surprised...paranoia big destroya!
TAM![]()
That is the way I read it, and I agree...
The mass media can be manipulated simply by staging events.
My first thought when I heard about the attacks was that bin Laden did well to get it live on TV. Perfect mass media manipulation.
Paranoia is only harmful if it debilitates your life. It could be looked on as a form of heightened awareness if it is not allowed to run uncontrolled. Is 9/11 supposed to be some sort of sacred cow, that is exempt from being fictionalised because you find it distasteful?
I think you missed the point there but I could be wrong.Paranoia is only harmful if it debilitates your life. It could be looked on as a form of heightened awareness if it is not allowed to run uncontrolled. Is 9/11 supposed to be some sort of sacred cow, that is exempt from being fictionalised because you find it distasteful?
But do the makers of films like Flight 93 get a pass because it isn't really fiction then, or did you criticise that too?you want to fictionalize it, fine, your business...as long as you keep it to yourself.
However, when your "fictionalization" accuses many good people of murder WITHOUT EVIDENCE, and you produce your "fictionalization" on public forums, you can expect, and deserve hostility, and contempt.
As for your comments on paranoia being some form of heightened awareness, all I have to say is such crap usually only comes from too many hits from the Bong...utter tripe.
TAM![]()
But do the makers of films like Flight 93 get a pass because it isn't really fiction then, or did you criticise that too?
Did the makers of flight 93 making up stories without any proof, without any solid basis in fact? No, they created a movie based on the facts and evidence from the events of that day. Truther theory, truther movies, take speculation, misrepresentation, and unimportant "coincidences" and try to spin them all together in some big weave of government deception.
Anyway, arguing this with someone with your perspective is pointless.
Onward.
TAM![]()
I doubt that having any of the strikes broadcast live on TV was a priority to the perpetrators. Getting the strikes to occur as close as possible in time would be the main priority to ensure success. I think purposely delaying an attack so it could be broadcast live would be too risky. Like njslim said, just look at what a delay did to 93. Obviously this is all opinion, but so is the supposition that they planned it to be shown live.