Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
JCR, the ngc program is heavily biased. It is a travesty to the serious researchers. Why didnt it present the freeman and klamath footage? Why not the hair morphology? The gaussian curve?
 
JcR said:
I find it interesting... Esteban Sarmiento talks of how dermal ridges
and scars etc can be faked. Just skip Chilcutt and go to 2:03 in the video.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M15H9WGzWbw
Click to expand...

Whenever Chilcutt talks he reminds me of a certain someone (skip Doug, go to 00:40):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZDm0k_vzU&feature=related

And if you're really bored watch this. Seven parts,,, if you can take the torture.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GHK2O6ARpB8&feature=related
Click to expand...

I actually sat through part one. You hurt my brain.
 
Jc, a man trying to imitate something is a travesty? Come on, ask anyone to do that, and all of them sound like complete morons, yet that doesnt mean there wrong.
 
Kitz, thats not the point. The point is that people are no more credible or less credible when they imitate a sound
 
makaya325 said:
JCR, the ngc program is heavily biased. It is a travesty to the serious researchers. Why didnt it present the freeman and klamath footage? Why not the hair morphology? The gaussian curve?
Click to expand...

Makaya - please explain - in your own words - why each of those is good evidence and why it should be referenced by serious researchers.
 
makaya325 said:
Jc, a man trying to imitate something is a travesty? Come on, ask anyone to do that, and all of them sound like complete morons, yet that doesnt mean there wrong.
Click to expand...

It is not an example of being wrong...I don't think they need help
in that department anyways.
 
Rockin, the hairs are similiar to human, except that all 11 lack medullas, are thicker, cut, tapered ends.
 
Imitating sounds is just that...
And credibility is another creature altogether.
 
makaya325 said:
Rockin, the hairs are similiar to human, except that all 11 lack medullas,
are thicker, cut, tapered ends.
Click to expand...

Human hair can lack medullas.
In other words - the lack of a medulla does not rule out the hairs being human.

What to heck does "thicker" mean?
Are you referring to the Maximum Shaft Diameter?
Is that measurement outside of known human hair?
If so - by how much? (Please cite reference)

Ummm..."cut". Please explain what you meant by that.

Tapered ends...do you mean the distal hair tip is tapered?
Human hair can have naturally occurring taper.
Is it a Natural Taper or a Rounded Taper?
 
Last edited:
GT, i mean that the hairs are cut, which isnt found in human hair

Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate–and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom