• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

Old man, you find only a couple a year, despite the fact that their are over 93 million deer in the us?
Well, I was assuming that the ten or so that my friends and I shoot every year don't count, or the scores I see dead by the side of the road. The fact is, in my part of the country, darned few deer die of causes other than the above. NYS hunters kill close to a quarter of the deer herd annually, and cars take more than that. Not many die 'in the woods'.

Almost all of my time 'in the woods' (in the past ten years or so) is spent on one 85 acre parcel. It ends up being a pretty small amount of time, and much of that time is spent 'working' (cutting firewood, mowing trails).

But, yea, I could probably go out (once the snow's gone) and find a deer carcass within a few days.
 
OK, here's a report that passes mayaka's criteria:

Date: june08, 2005
Humboldt county, CA

Nearest town: Eureka
Nearest road: this was 5 mile back in the woods
Conditions: clear and warm
Time: late afternoon
Location: I was camping after my sister's funeral, to clear my head and to get back on track with my life.

Description of event: A friend of mine suggested a 2 week camping trip. We hiked 5 miles back into the woods, are astarting was my friends parents house at the outskirts Eureka. After the 4th night we started to hear noise coming from the tree line... this happen 3 nights running, then stopped for several days. Then about the 10th day we started to have a weird feeling that we were being watched, so we decided we take turns watching the aera. My friend took the first. Around 5:30 my friend called me over to take a look through the binoculars to get my opinion of animal he had sighted, so I took a long look at it, and told him that it might be a bigfoot by the way it was walking up the ridge on two legs. My friend was doubtful at first. He changed his mind when he ran into it later while using the facilities.

Wow, I was really expecting more. So what exactly about this report makes it pass your criteria? It's location? Two alleged witnesses?

OK, my turn. Here's one of our resident Bigfoot enthusiast's favourite reports from Valatie, New York (you're living in NY state, right?):

http://bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=5245

How's that fit with your criteria?
 
we started to have a weird feeling that we were being watched


Why is it that when people say this kind of thing the watcher never turns out to be a cricket or chipmunk?
 
Kitz, that was a report i found cool, im unsure of its credibility. That wasnt my report for criteria. Im still searching
 
Yes, kitz. Even though i find these reports cool, i have no way of knowing if theyre true or not
 
Kitz, mq is not even reliable. Its another one of the bs documentarys for ratings.

Kitz, there are a good # of weird people, some very large, That roam around my region. My friend and i, after we got pizza, encountered a large homeless man in a local park. This man was tall, around 6ft 10, and his mass was enormous! I see why people who see bf are petrified
 
Kitz, mq is not even reliable. Its another one of the bs documentarys for ratings.

Kitz, there are a good # of weird people, some very large, That roam around my region. My friend and i, after we got pizza, encountered a large homeless man in a local park. This man was tall, around 6ft 10, and his mass was enormous! I see why people who see bf are petrified

You didn't answer my question. Did you watch the episode or not? Did you see the police officer's testimony? Did you listen to Bigfoot scientist and biologist John Bindernagel investigate the evidence and say the finds were compelling? Did you listen to what the members of NESRA had to say?
 
Kitz, i would wager on some bf reports being large freaks of nature.

Yes, but you are also making it clear that for reasons not yet clear, you find some Bigfoot reports to be compelling. This is in contradiction with when you decided to tell us you were in log's BF extinction camp. It doesn't sound like you know how you would like to represent yourself and what you believe.
 
Kitz, since your a hard skeptic, why ask me the ques? Yes i saw it, and besides bindernagel, i didnt care much. Ny doesnt have enough land for large animals to live undetected

Lets see: 20 per state=1000 bf in the us. Take canada into account, and it gets lower.
 
Kitz, just bc i find some reports interesting (not compelling) doesnt mean i think theyre alive today.
 
Kitz, since your a hard skeptic, why ask me the ques? Yes i saw it, and besides bindernagel, i didnt care much. Ny doesnt have enough land for large animals to live undetected

Who are you to say there's not enough land? Vancouver Island field biologist Bindernagel who is a lot more qualified to offer an opinion disagrees with you. So who are you. What makes you so flippant to dismiss it? For one there are the Adirondacks. You think a big animal could hide in NY state? What about Bindernagel? He believes in Bigfoot first from evidence from Vancouver Island. Is that not less land then NY state?

Lets see: 20 per state=1000 bf in the us. Take canada into account, and it gets lower.

20 per state, 1000 in US? What kind of breeding population is that? 20? You realize every person of any type of expertise who has put serious thought and research into the matter comes up with numbers far higher than that. There's a good reason.

Are you just going back in the hat for numbers or do you know something those guys don't?
 
Last edited:
Kitz, its an estimate. Not every state will have 20. The average would likely be 20 per state. Also, add canada, which would take away the numbers from us, and make the individuals per state even less.

Vancouver island is far far less populated than ny state.
 

Back
Top Bottom