• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Long, were are the published elk dna tests regarding the cast? Werent there somethings that couldnt be attributed to an elk?

Honestly, no ( thats why referring to it is so silly)

If you read the links posted- even Noll had to "convince" the other "investigators' on the scene.

When you have to stretch things to make points, you dont have "nothing"- you have less than nothing.

The question you should ask is what about the cast CONCLUSIVELY pointed to a BF- the answer is nothing.

I have to quote my buddy crow here because he literally summed up the whole issue in one sentence

>>>The Skookum cast represents the single most innane contrivance of evidence (of any sort for any reason) that I've ever seen

He is giving it more credit than it deserves
 
Crow, you have provided no visual evidence that your claim of Patty piloerection is accurate in the first place. You are now moving beyond that to theorize why it happened.

Well I did. I marked photo on the gorilla and Patty where I suspect piloerection. If you didn't find them too bad.
 
You were told what was necessary to show active bristling. You didn't. Now you are acting like you already met the criteria. Are you a weasel?
 
Crow, read my post again, and address my point. You seem to have a different definition of retreat than the rest of us.

You'll have to talk to Bill about taking Patty's pulse. Perhaps his fold analysis will reveal something ..

Greg I'm going to be honest with you here. I don't pay an awful lot of attention to the things you write or your observations. Maybe Patty was retreating so oddly because she had something on her mind. Maybe she was trying to figure out why the clown with the camera was acting strangely and not like a guy supposedly filming a real live Bigfoot like herself. Heck you've expended a few neurons on that yourself.
 
You were told what was necessary to show active bristling. You didn't. Now you are acting like you already met the criteria. Are you a weasel?

I was told? What do you mean I was told? What is this potty training? Well I went though photos I've posted and yes there are two photos where I highlighted the forearms of Patty.

IMO bristling.




 
I was told? What do you mean I was told? What is this potty training? Well I went though photos I've posted and yes there are two photos where I highlighted the forearms of Patty.

IMO bristling.



[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_1875549373eb843497.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/18755493740ca033c5.jpg[/qimg]

Log, could you slide the green bit over to Patty's bum so we can see the poopies?
 
I never would have guessed.:rolleyes:

You don't seem to pay much attention to what anyone writes..

You are correct my son. I pay attention to me. And oh I would pay perfect attention to anyone that's going to stand in for me when my unavoidable appointment arrives. If that's not you then suck it up and live with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom