Crowlogic
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,147
A lot of discussion has been raised concerning the nature of the prints in the Patterson Film. Some of that discussion has centered around the "too perfect nature" of the casts and some of the prints.
However assuming that the tracks to be cast were imperfect due to soil flinging and material back filling the prints Patterson could have easily cleaned up the unwanted material. After all who was going to know? If Patterson did in fact stamp phony tracks how and why are some of the details discussed apparent in some of the tracks and not all of the tracks? The so called mid tarsal break has at times been attributed to the effect of nothing more than the big rubber costume feet of the mime in the suit. Lastly the film has been undergoing analysis for 40 years and why in those 40 years until now did nobody propose that the appearance of the prints look stamped? Its also worth considering that the operation of stamping the phony track line across the film site would have left a cluster of boot prints left by the hoaxers as they did their print stamping. Human activity around each and every print has never been mentioned while evidence of casting some prints has.
I've added these photos the Patterson site photos and some others which show some very nice clean prints made by natural walking by natural walkers. The fossilized print obviously was not a stamped hoax but sure preserved cleanly and if cast would raise a few eyebrows as to its nature. Also take notice of what appears to be a mid tarsal break in the human tracks across the beach.
However assuming that the tracks to be cast were imperfect due to soil flinging and material back filling the prints Patterson could have easily cleaned up the unwanted material. After all who was going to know? If Patterson did in fact stamp phony tracks how and why are some of the details discussed apparent in some of the tracks and not all of the tracks? The so called mid tarsal break has at times been attributed to the effect of nothing more than the big rubber costume feet of the mime in the suit. Lastly the film has been undergoing analysis for 40 years and why in those 40 years until now did nobody propose that the appearance of the prints look stamped? Its also worth considering that the operation of stamping the phony track line across the film site would have left a cluster of boot prints left by the hoaxers as they did their print stamping. Human activity around each and every print has never been mentioned while evidence of casting some prints has.
I've added these photos the Patterson site photos and some others which show some very nice clean prints made by natural walking by natural walkers. The fossilized print obviously was not a stamped hoax but sure preserved cleanly and if cast would raise a few eyebrows as to its nature. Also take notice of what appears to be a mid tarsal break in the human tracks across the beach.
Last edited:
Ray's family members displaying his Bigfoot goofiness after he passed away is not the same as Ray getting a conscience and coming clean to the press.