Quad4_72
AI-EE-YAH!
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,354
Prove that the UN school was used as a fighting position.
Parky why is it that you are always trying to stand up for the terrorist group Hamas?
Last edited:
Prove that the UN school was used as a fighting position.
The UN gives way too much credence to the accuracy of shelling in a combat situation. Military commanders can only dream of such accuracy in real combat.(bolding mine). Then let's look further at the findings of the UN report:
The UN report gives ample indications that the IDF deliberately shelled the UN compound and not the nearby Hezbollah rocket launching sites.
That Israel wants to kill children seems to be the theme here with some posters, doesn't it?It's entirely possible that IDF forces thought there were being fired on from the school and called in artillery. I doubt they shelled it just to kill kids.
the UN denies that Hamas militants fired from the school.
That Israel wants to kill children seems to be the theme here with some posters, doesn't it?
How to find the truth? i heard it died after the first shots where fired....
Whom should I give more weight to: Major-General Franklin van Kappen or some guy on the internet?The UN gives way too much credence to the accuracy of shelling in a combat situation. Military commanders can only dream of such accuracy in real combat.
Even if it was, it doesn't surprise me that they allow Hamas to hide in their facilities given the UN's general stance on Israel.
Who do you believe, the report of someone who was thousands of miles away at the time or the people who were actually there?Whom should I give more weight to: Major-General Franklin van Kappen or some guy on the internet?
Which version should I believe: Van Kappen's analysis, based on the impacts, or the IDF's, which is provably false (see, e.g., (e) and (f) of the analysis)?
From page 5 of the report: http://www.undemocracy.com/S-1996-337.pdf(c) About 15 minutes before the shelling, they fired between 5 and 8 rounds of 120 millimetre mortar from a location 220 metres from the center of the compound. The location was identified on the ground. According to witnesses, the mortar was installed ther between 1100 and 1200 hours that day, but no action was taken by UNIFIL personnel to remove it.
WTF?(e) At some point (it is not completely clear whether before or after the shelling) 2 or 3 Hezbollah fighters entered the United Nations compound, where their families were.
30 killed in blast at UN school in Gaza
A case of Hamas deliberately putting civilians in harm's way.
30 killed in blast at UN school in Gaza
A case of Hamas deliberately putting civilians in harm's way.
It's this sort of action that makes my head spin when I see ambulances in Gaza scrambling to rescue civilians. Don't they all wish to be martyrs? ... and have their children be martyred? Kind of hypocritical, isn't it?
As for the topic itself, it is distressing how little the newspapers over here in Britain are reporting on the allegation that Hamas were firing from the school. The Independent makes no mention of it on their front page, once again making a mockery of their name.
But – here we go. I am increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It's not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon?
[...]
I am talking about scientific issues. If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September? Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it? The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings. They have not yet reported on WTC 7. Two prominent American professors of mechanical engineering – very definitely not in the "raver" bracket – are now legally challenging the terms of reference of this final report on the grounds that it could be "fraudulent or deceptive".
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinio...en-i-question-the-truth-about-911-462904.html
The UN gives way too much credence to the accuracy of shelling in a combat situation. Military commanders can only dream of such accuracy in real combat.
Maybe like you, but not like me:The Palestians are NOT subhuman. They are human beings just like you and me and have family/loved one's just like you and me.
If the UN did their job and kept Hamas from establishing fighting positions in and around the school this incident would never have happened.Funny isn't it?
The goalposts change from "precision warfare" to "inaccurate warfare" depending on what suits the Israeli apologists.
And of course the Israeli spokespeople continue to pump out the lie that Israel takes care to avoid civilian casualities.
So even their were Hamas fighters in this school, of which there's no evidence for, then Israel would have also known their were 1,000 civilians in this school. yet they fired upon the school anyway.
Stop swallowing the Israeli lies
Maybe like you, but not like me:
What a sick society. No wonder they elected terorists as their leaders.