• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

EILEEN MCKUSICK, Tuning Forks and Diagnosis

steenkh

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Aug 22, 2002
Messages
10,024
Location
Denmark
In the presentation of the protocol for the sound diagnostician Eileen McKusick, I am again surprised at how every care is taken to make the test as cheap as possible for the applicant. The test subjects are specifically told that "they will need to provide their own transportation to the testing site". Why not ask ms. McKusick if she is willing to pay for the transportation of some test persons if they do not have their own means?

I have no idea how easy it is to locate people with seven distinct areas of chronic pain who are willing to participate in a test like this, but I could imagine that it would help a lot if they had their expenses reimbursed.

I cannot understand how a tuning fork can be used to diagnose anything if ms. McKusick is not allowed to touch the test persons. After all, a tuning fork works by touching an object and using it to amplify the sound of the fork - but then, that is really ms. McKusick's problem!
 
In the presentation of the protocol for the sound diagnostician Eileen McKusick, I am again surprised at how every care is taken to make the test as cheap as possible for the applicant. The test subjects are specifically told that "they will need to provide their own transportation to the testing site". Why not ask ms. McKusick if she is willing to pay for the transportation of some test persons if they do not have their own means?


Actually, I am more surprised participants are restricted to only those from Vermont. Johnson, Vermont, (which I presume would be the testing location) is a bit north in the state, but it is within reasonable driving distance from much of New England, upstate New York, and parts of Canada.
 
In medicine, tuning forks are used for only a few diagnostics tests.

Vibration sense, in the peripheral arms or legs to determine if their spinal cord or nerves that transmit vibration sense if damaged. It is mostly done by neurologists.

Transmission of sounds to determine if hearing loss is neural or a transmission problem.

There may be others but this claim is...unique.
 
1. How much time does she have for the individual volunteers?

2. How "identical" must her responses be? For example, if the source of pain is "the back" is "lower back" considered identical?

3. Shouldn't "However, if any interview between them reveals another source of chronic pain, it will not be counted as a hit, and will not affect the test." be changed to something more general like "However, the test and its outcome are not to be affected in any form by any interview."?
 
2. How "identical" must her responses be? For example, if the source of pain is "the back" is "lower back" considered identical?
As far as I understand, ms. McKusick is given a list of the possible areas of pain, and she has to choose which one is applicable for each test person. I assume that the list will be kept unambiguous so that "the back" and "lower back" will not both be present, but that is really something that ms. McKusick should insist on.
 
Check the Challenge Applicants subsection for updated information on Ms. McKusick's Challenge file.
 
7 Volunteers who suffer from chronic pain of roughly the same height, gender and weight (where possible)
I'm surprised about the "where possible" part. The now-infamous "as far ass possible" from Carina Landin's protocol generated an awful lot of trouble. I'd expect protocols after Carina Landin's to avoid any "where possible" where possible ;)

Even though having different heights, genders and/or weights is supposed to be in favor of the applicant, I can imagine a situation in which the applicant complains (after failing the test) that she expected same height volunteers and they were very different; it goes something like this:
The first three patients where 1.80 meters high. I expected the fourth to be about the same height, but it was a lot shorter, about 1.65 meters. I sensed his head pain clearly, however his head was in the same place where the three previous patients had their neck, so I mis-identified it as a neck pain. The patient was covered so I couldn't see him, and there was a pillow under the cloth which looked to me like his head.​
 
From the Challenge thread:
Eileen McKusick has opted to cut off protocol negotiations until sometime after June, when she says she will have more time to focus on her claim.
What a bummer! If only it was because ms. McKusick has realised that there is something wrong with her claim!
 
I don't think there's any need to criticise her for dropping negotiations for a while. Just think how most applicants behave, with months of dancing around, abuse and pretending to get somewhere. At least Ms. McKusick has the decency to say that she won't be doing anything for six months and save a lot of time and effort on both sides.
 
Anyone who knows they have the ability to win $1m should be willing to spend 6 months full time to winning that prize. If a person is not willing to spend that time then a good question is what is worth more than $1m? The answer for most applicants would be they know they do not have the ability to win the $1m.
 
I don't think there's any need to criticise her for dropping negotiations for a while. Just think how most applicants behave, with months of dancing around, abuse and pretending to get somewhere. At least Ms. McKusick has the decency to say that she won't be doing anything for six months and save a lot of time and effort on both sides.

See the other thread. Fixed your quote. Now it is true.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom