Hijackers remains identified, separated from victims

[T.A.M.]

HI probably thinks that scientists just seperated DNA from people they knew where on board and left all the unidentified DNA as the hijackers DNA... Not realizing the problem with this we should just ignore him.

Yes, that is the typical truther response, has been in the past. This article seems to indicate, however, that they were (all but a few) IDENTIFIED using DNA analysis.

The truther can whine and bitch about it all they want, and frankly short of being taken on a tour of the crime lab, and shown the analysis itself, they probably will cry and whine.

TAM

 

[Ragnarok]

Unless it can be proven that a significant number of people questioning the events of 9/11 believe there were no hijackers, this is a pretty pathetic line of argument. Associating the crack-pots who do believe in no planes and/or no hijackers, with people who are asking genuine and relevant questions, is another poor and dishonest tactic.

 

[DavidJames]

Unless it can be proven that a significant number of people questioning the events of 9/11 believe there were no hijackers, this is a pretty pathetic line of argument. Associating the crack-pots who do believe in no planes and/or no hijackers, with people who are asking genuine and relevant questions, is another poor and dishonest tactic.

Who are these people asking "genuine and relevant" questions? I have seen none, not a single one, on this forum.

 

[T.A.M.]

Unless it can be proven that a significant number of people questioning the events of 9/11 believe there were no hijackers, this is a pretty pathetic line of argument. Associating the crack-pots who do believe in no planes and/or no hijackers, with people who are asking genuine and relevant questions, is another poor and dishonest tactic.

Well, yes, it is to a degree rhetoric, not genuine "line of argument", however, you have the film "phenom" loose change claiming the hijackers are still alive, which this latest article should stomp on. You have Truth movement leader Jim Fetzer, commenting in a public forum on 9/11, with his "Top 10 reasons the hijackers are fake". If you search this forum, you will find more than one thread on the issue, so please don't make it seem like this line of thought is some fringe thinking within the 9/11 truth movements "theories".

I do not consider "people who are asking genuine and relevant questions" to necessarily be TRUTHERS. Some are, many are not.

Please separate the "no planers" from the "no hijackers/hijackers still alive" arguments, as they are significantly different.

TAM

 

[T.A.M.]

Who are these people asking "genuine and relevant" questions? I have seen none, not a single one, on this forum.

Well I think they are out there, we just don't see a lot here. However, there have been people who had doubts, who came here, and now know the snake oil for what it is.

Then there are the "alleged" 100s of thousands of people who "allegedly" don't believe the "official story".

TAM

 

[T.A.M.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fbP1lvmBY8

for reference.

TAM

 

[DavidJames]

Well I think they are out there, we just don't see a lot here. However, there have been people who had doubts, who came here, and now know the snake oil for what it is.

Yeah, my comment was to finite. There have been people who honestly asked questions. On this forum, I can think of one, maybe two who came with doubts and not a thinly veiled agenda.

I guess I was using the politics section math like when you round the votes for Libertarian presidential candidates, it rounds to zero .