Call it what you want. Israel is still responsible
Nope. That would the the government of Paletsinians. Governments have to work out deals on behalf of their people. All governments do this.
So Gaza is still Israel's responsibility.
Nope, however, I agree that the disengagement is incomplete, so Israel has good reason to work to make it so. There have been interruptions, you see ...
Nobody is out to kill every last Israeli. The destruction of Israel is not genocide -- no more than the destruction of Apartheid South Africa was genocide.
Then why was it called genocide when the Bosnian Serbs killed a few thousand Bosnian Muslims? Why is the term genocide being used in Darfur? In Rwanda? Are you sure you want to stick with that? Seems a slight double standard here, though to a certain extent, I actually agree that the destruction of Israel will not mean the destruction of Jews, however, it will mean the destruction of Israeli Jews, see above genocide, etcetera, ethnic cleansing, what have you.
Hamas has offered a 2-state solution along the 1967 borders. So has the rest of the Arab world.
And rockets. Don't forget the bonus package.
Go on... Bring up the charter. Everyone knows what is in the Hamas charter, including the members (leaders) of Hamas who have stated their support for the offer. But Israel refuses to talk about it.
Well, some opinions have more weight than others, depends on locale. The opinions of the Chinese on the Colorado River watershed agreements between US and Mexico means about Jack S
The occupation of Gaza is not over.
Indeed. Hamas is the occupying power. Oh, wait, they are the government.
Decide upon the borders of Israel, let the Palestinians have control of their borders. Then the occupation is over.
Nope.
And, no, I don't say the withdrawl is meaningless. It is full of meaning.
More than that, it was full of action.
"Here, it's yours."
DR