If a terrorist organization is stealing an undetermined portion of food aid and then presumably selling it or distributing it to the population in need and the alternatives are to continue supplying food aid or having the population who had their aid stolen scrounge in garbage dumps for food, should the food aid be cut off? Yes or no?If a terrorist organization is stealing aid is it your contention that aid should continue to flow unchecked? Yes or no.
Unresponsive ranting aside, You have yet to define how Hamas stealing some undetermined fraction of food aid is a threat to Israel.You have left the realm of reality. Really you have. You are bending over backwards and twisting into a pretzel to cling to a ill-informed position.
And yet, when the Gaza residents have a portion of their food aid stolen my Hamas, your solution is to cut off food aid. Go figure.OMFG. What a load.
If someone reports an unauthorized withdrawal from their bank account IT IS CLOSED BY THE BANK to STOP THE THEIVES from withdrawing more money. The bank does not take the rest of the money away from the person holding the compromised bank account.
Well, generally they cancel the card and reissue it so that the VICTIM of the thieves can continue purchasing. Do you really not see the problem with your analogy?If someone reports an unauthorized use from their credit card IT IS CANCELED BY THE BANK to STOP THE THEIVES from USING THE CREDIT CARD. The bank does not take the credit card away from the person holding the compromised credit card.
Does the punishment fit the crime?edited to add: There is no mechanism to stop Hamas from stealing aid for it's operations, that is why Israel restricts aid to Gaza. Period. End of story.
I did not accuse you of making profanity-laden personal attacks, thus ironically making your "defense" a straw man. I accused you of "screaming iprofanity via your keyboard" in response to this statement:Are you here because you like the adrenaline rush from screaming iprofanity via your computer keyboard or because you actually wish to contribute an intellectual discussion?
I have used ZERO profanity-laden personal attacks in this thread. The fact that you created a strawman whereby I am using profanity exposes the utter weakness of your position.
I will let others decide whether or not it is a personal attack to accuse someone of a "gross level of ignorance"Why the ^%#% that has to be spoon fed to posters here exposes the gross level of ignorance in this matter.
I have never claimed to be an expert on the subject. I have not, to my knowledge, denied the validity of any of the factual information that you have posted. I have, however, challenged your interpretation of those facts, in particular regarding the legitimacy of Israeli actions, as well as the underlying logic (or lack thereof) in your arguments.What polarizes this discussion is people - see: you - behaving as experts on this subject. Then, when they - see: you -are confronted with documentation and facts that are linked and cited, they - see: you - continue to flame the person who was kind enough to provide documented evidence.
Really? please elaborate. Or is this just another gratuitous ad hominem insult?That is why there is polarization of this discussion. You are no different than a 9-11 truther.