• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Demolition theory problem

moon1969

Graduate Poster
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
1,288
How many tons of explosives would it take to take down the Twin Towers? And if demolitions were planted how come nobody noticed anything?
 
How many tons of explosives would it take to take down the Twin Towers? And if demolitions were planted how come nobody noticed anything?

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

 
Also it would take too many people since Twin Towers were big. There is no way that if explosives were planted then nobody would have noticed anything. Oh yeah of course if it was one them reptile plot :D but it would just take too many people. Twoofers don"t make any sense. And twoofers say that explosives were planted then who were these people who planted the explosives to the Twin Towers? Who did they work for? Where are they now?
 
Last edited:
Well it took 2,728 lb of explosives to demolish the J.L. Hudson Department store, the largest controlled demolition ever done. That building was 29 stories tall. WTC 1 & 2 were 220 stories combined, so that would make the total explosives needed at about 20,460 lbs.

As for thermite, I don't know. If thermite does such a great job demolishing buildings why isn't it used in the demolition industry?
 
Also if NWO used demolition why go through all that trouble of flying planes into the towers? Why did the NWO need planes if they used demolition? Twoofers don"t make much sense. And if Bush and the PNAC guys did 9/11 then how come they could not but WMD"s in Iraq? They could do 9/11 but not but WMD"s in Iraq? Doesn"t make any sense.
 
The typical CT answer to this is that since the "Official Theory" has the towers collapsing without any explosives whatsoever, it wouldn't require much at all. The problem comes when you look at their claims that "prove" it was CD. Claims like "all the concrete was pulverized to dust" and "the building fell at free fall speeds" are not only wrong, but to be correct, would require MASSIVE amounts explosives being planted specifically to accomplish those things alone.

So the question isn't
"How many tons of explosives would it take to take down the Twin Towers?"
it's
"How many tons of explosives would it take to do what you (the CTist, not moon) claim it did?"
 
Well it took 2,728 lb of explosives to demolish the J.L. Hudson Department store, the largest controlled demolition ever done. That building was 29 stories tall. WTC 1 & 2 were 220 stories combined, so that would make the total explosives needed at about 20,460 lbs.

As for thermite, I don't know. If thermite does such a great job demolishing buildings why isn't it used in the demolition industry?

come on, you, I, and about 4 other NWO agents could have planted those on weekends at the WTCs over the last, what, 5000 years???

TAM;)
 
Well it took 2,728 lb of explosives to demolish the J.L. Hudson Department store, the largest controlled demolition ever done. That building was 29 stories tall. WTC 1 & 2 were 220 stories combined, so that would make the total explosives needed at about 20,460 lbs.

As for thermite, I don't know. If thermite does such a great job demolishing buildings why isn't it used in the demolition industry?

Hmmm, thats a lot of explosives.
To bad they didnt know about gravity, it would of saved a whole lot of explosives, huh?
 
I'll admit it. I was the head of the team that planted explosives in the WTC. Don't ask how we managed to do it without a single person noticing or why the explosives did't go off with a very loud "BANG," these things are trade secrets of the NWO. Oh, and I was only 15 on 9/11; the NWO recruits early, why do you think that we are 100% loyal down to the man?
 
Hmmm, thats a lot of explosives.
To bad they didnt know about gravity, it would of saved a whole lot of explosives, huh?

There's no such thing as gravity. The NIST made it up to try to cover up the fact that the NWO did it with silent exploding thermite.

Besides, everybody knows a fire can't make a steel and concrete structure collapse. It's been repeated so many times it has to be true.
 
If explosives were used then why wasn't any detonation cord found? There would have to be miles of the stuff all leading back to a command box somewhere.
 
If explosives were used then why wasn't any detonation cord found? There would have to be miles of the stuff all leading back to a command box somewhere.

I thought they used thermite, or thermate, or some sort of space based weapon ... no wait, that was last year's theory ... what's the new thing?

Just had a truther on another forum call for an international investigation, I asked who would do it, the NWO? Somehow, when they ask for it, giving up our sovereign rights are OK ..:boggled:
 
Hmmm, thats a lot of explosives.
To bad they didnt know about gravity, it would of saved a whole lot of explosives, huh?
CD uses gravity. Gravity is the biggest source of energy used in CD. Live long enough and you may learn enough to understand 9/11.

Got research? Got knowledge?

20,000 pounds of explosives are trivial.

9/11 gravity collapse, each tower had the energy of 130 TONS of TNT.

260,000 pounds of TNT, vs. the trivial amount for CD of 20,000 pounds. That is an order of magnitude! Mother nature supplied ten times the energy to collapse the buildings than measly mortals use! No wonder the collapse was impressive.

The lack of knowledge displayed by you and 9/11 truth is pathetic. Get some knowledge and stop making posts your grandkids will cringe when they see them, as my will at my lack of writing skills.

There is only one reason to use explosives for bringing down buildings. To control the failure! Fire leads to chaotic collapse that can lead to damage 10 times greater than the footprint of the building depending on the amount of gravitational energy involved.

Learn how to use physics practically, and make your grandkids proud by refuting the idiot ideas of 9/11 truth. You will not regret having knowledge.
 

Back
Top Bottom