Why didn't the NWO rig the US election?

[Thunder]

You see, there are actually two NWOs.

there is the right-wing fascist Neo-Con Zionist evangelical luciferian NWO

and there is the left-wing communist Zionist liberal homosexual atheist NWO.

the former NWO....won in 2000. the latter won in 2008.

but they are ALL....the New World Order!!!

muhahahaha!!!!

 

[Orphia Nay]

You see, there are actually two NWOs.

there is the right-wing fascist Neo-Con Zionist evangelical luciferian NWO

and there is the left-wing communist Zionist liberal homosexual atheist NWO.

the former NWO....won in 2000. the latter won in 2008.

but they are ALL....the New World Order!!!

muhahahaha!!!!

 

[Belz...]

"Why didn't they rig the election? Because they run both parties."

Ah, yes. "They". Magic words are fun.

 

[Belz...]

You see, there are actually two NWOs.

there is the right-wing fascist Neo-Con Zionist evangelical luciferian NWO

and there is the left-wing communist Zionist liberal homosexual atheist NWO.

the former NWO....won in 2000. the latter won in 2008.

but they are ALL....the New World Order!!!

muhahahaha!!!!

Actually you guys got it all wrong. There are UFOs (unidentified flying objects), and NWOs (neverland wiggling objects). What exactly this means is left to your imaginations...

 

[twinstead]

Ah, yes. "They". Magic words are fun.

It appears that if McCain would have won, "They" would have obviously fixed the election to keep the Republicans in charge. Now, since Obama won, "They" had no need to fix the election because both parties are the same.

Boy, is THAT a win win situation.

 

[twinstead]

Actually you guys got it all wrong. There are UFOs (unidentified flying objects), and NWOs (neverland wiggling objects). What exactly this means is left to your imaginations...

I'm praying to God right now that "neverland wiggling objects" has nothing to do with Michael Jackson...

 

[moon1969]

Robert Mugabe did in Zimbabwe but since Mugabe is no a part of the NWO and an anti-NWO dictator.

 

[Almo]

I suspect foul play in the 2000 and 2004 elections, but not on a broad conspiratorial scale. It was a close election, and only small opportunities need have been taken to change the result. The 2008 election wasn't close enough for that kind of tampering.

ETA: for example, the notorious Pat Buchanan bump where the ballots were poorly designed.

 

[moon1969]

Alexander Lukashenko did in Belarus. But who cares Lukashenko is anti-NWO.

 

[PhantomWolf]

I suspect foul play in the 2000 and 2004 elections, but not on a broad conspiratorial scale. It was a close election, and only small opportunities need have been taken to change the result. The 2008 election wasn't close enough for that kind of tampering.

ETA: for example, the notorious Pat Buchanan bump where the ballots were poorly designed.

2004 wasn't close, Kerry wasn't ever going to win, he simply was not a credible candidate.

 

[Orphia Nay]

Ah, yes. "They". Magic words are fun.

The thread I started is now 10 pages long (with some major derails). How DO you debate the existence of the NWO? The believers have no evidence for their existence, and they expect me to prove a negative. It's insanity!

 

[JoeyDonuts]

So help me FSM, I WILL tie the horrid music of Barry Manilow to a NWO Conspiracy.

 

[Orphia Nay]

So help me FSM, I WILL tie the horrid music of Barry Manilow to a NWO Conspiracy.

Big nose = Joo = NWO... easy!

 

[Belz...]

I'm praying to God right now that "neverland wiggling objects" has nothing to do with Michael Jackson...

I've heard his nose is an NWO.

 

[Almo]

2004 wasn't close, Kerry wasn't ever going to win, he simply was not a credible candidate.

And Bush was? (this is not questioning your assessment that it wasn't close)

 

[PhantomWolf]

And Bush was? (this is not questioning your assessment that it wasn't close)

He did have 4 years experience

I always stated that had I been an American the only way I'd have voted in 2004 was if it was for which candidate to shoot.

 

[fromdownunder]

I've heard his nose is an NWO.

Michael Jackson's nose? Which one?

Anyway, dont blame me, I voted for Kang (or would have if I was a US citizen)

Norm

 

[gtc]

The latest edition of Hard Evidence - the NZ CT magazine* that is sold in many Australian news agents and news stands - has just been released. Its front cover shows Obama as a puppet of Israel (and some sort of owl logo?).

Clearly they have decided that all sides are in on it.


*Last month's cover was by Simon David Dees who they describe as one of the most famous artists of today but they also describe Rense.com as one of the most popular sites on the web.

 

[Orphia Nay]

The latest edition of Hard Evidence - the NZ CT magazine* that is sold in many Australian news agents and news stands - has just been released. Its front cover shows Obama as a puppet of Israel (and some sort of owl logo?).

Clearly they have decided that all sides are in on it.

A CT magazine called "Hard Evidence"?

Well, I guess the twoofers call themselves the "Truth Movement".

*Last month's cover was by Simon Dees who they describe as one of the most famous artists of today but they also describe Rense.com as one of the most popular sites on the web.

I've never heard of Simon Dees.

A lot of CTists at that other forum I post in think Rense.com is "disinfo".

 

[gtc]

Oops. I meant David Dees:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129626

I think there should be a law of the internet that every CT website will be viewed as absolute truth by some CTers and disinfo by the rest.