Another 'psychic' giving medical advice -Mary Occhino

Questioninggeller

Illuminator
Joined
May 11, 2002
Messages
3,048
Mary Occhino, aka MaryRose, has a weekly sirius radio show called "Medical Mondays" for "The intuitive approach to listeners’ current and future health."

According to the press release:

DATE: November 28, 2006 Tuesday 1:00 PM GMT
TITLE: SIRIUS Satellite Radio to Launch Exclusive Daily Talk Show With World-Renowned Psychic Medium Mary Occhino; Live, Call-In 'Angels on Call' To Air During Morning Drive
LENGTH: 997 words
DATELINE: NEW YORK, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/

SIRIUS Satellite Radio today announced that world-renowned psychic medium, bestselling author, and lecturer Mary Occhino will host Angels on Call, a new, live daily call-in talk show.
...
Angels on Call will debut Monday, December 11, 2006. Angels on Call is the first live daily morning talk show on the SIRIUS Stars channel. It will air live Monday - Friday from 8:00 - 11:00 am ET exclusively on SIRIUS Stars channel 102, the SIRIUS channel dedicated to fascinating people doing compelling radio, ranging from Barbara Walters to Richard Simmons, Senator Bill Bradley to Deepak Chopra ...
...

She claims "validation" from con-artist Gary Schwartz and appeared on conspiracy talk radio's Coast-to-Coast on January 25th, 2006.

Here's some of her predictions:

TITLE: DIVINE SECRETS - PSYCHIC MARY OCCHINO PREDICTS THE FATES OF THE ULTRA-FAMOUS. (Page Six Magazine).
SOURCE: New York Post (New York, NY)
DATE: Feb 8, 2007
INFORMATION: p77. (507 words)


AS HARD as it is to believe, the supermarket glossies have, at times, led us cruelly astray. Jennifer and Vince never tied the knot, and Jessica Simpson did not have a baby to save her marriage. Jaded with all the folly, we turn to the paranormal to get the real scoop on the stars' universe. With Miss Cleo currently incarcerated for fraud, we tapped a psychic medium without a felony conviction on her record: Mary Occhino, the host of "Angels on Call" on Sirius Satellite Radio.
...

TOO HOT IN THE KITCHEN
Do you think Mario Batali is going to spontaneously combust?
Between his sweating, and his belly and his orange clogs, I can't look at him anymore! He's a great chef, but it looks like if he has another piece of cheese, his heart is going to burst. I believe he needs to lose the weight - or he'll have a heart attack within three years.

FOX TROT
What's in store for Michael J. Fox?

He will absolutely change the course of history, and he'll be a guinea pig for stem-cell research. He's much bigger than this.

HOW LOHAN CAN YOU GO?
Lindsay Lohan is your neighbor in Long Island. What's in store for her?

She is so full of herself. She's going to ruin herself so totally that no one is going to want to work with her. She's going to be blackballed and working in a 7-Eleven on Long Island. If you are meant for people to know who you are, it will happen. If you try to manipulate the universe to become a star, it won't happen. You cannot just take people down on your way to the top.

BROWN OUT
Let's look at comebacks. Do you think Whitney Houston is back to stay?
She'll be back, and bigger than ever, now that she has shed the cancer that was Bobby Brown. She will do a movie and win an Academy award.

Really? That much of a comeback?
Oh, yeah. And she'll work with Mel Gibson. She will do the soundtrack and act. It will be some sort of epic drama.

IS HE STRAIGHT?
What about Star Jones' husband? Will he leave her for a cabana boy?
She's so strong-willed that she'll never get divorced.

Will her career recover?
She's a lawyer; she can always make money - it just won't be "The View." It will never be like that again.
...

And lastly,

Title:Seeking by sixth sense: Court TV profiles Bay Shore psychic who has more than stars in her eyes when helping in police work.
Source: Newsday (Melville, NY)
DATE: (April 25, 2006)(435 words)
Byline: Zachary R. Dowdy

Apr. 25--One day in April 1997, veteran New York Police Department Det. Joe Croce sat and watched Bay Shore's Mary Rose scribble on a hand-drawn chart representing the heavens. The detective's world of solid objects - bodies, blood and guns - could not vary more from Rose's intangible realm of mediums and the metaphysical. That encounter, which led police to the East River - and the body of a missing person - will be re-enacted by Croce and Rose on national television at 10 p.m. tomorrow on Court TV. ...

The four hours Croce spent with Rose, a self-described astrologer-psychological profiler and psychic, may have helped crack the case of the disappearance of Patrick McNeill Jr. His body was found in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, two days after Rose drew the chart, which she says led to his body almost two months after he was seen leaving a bar on the Upper East Side.

Rose will play herself in tomorrow's episode of Court TV's "Psychic Detectives," a show that highlights cases where law enforcement relies on the paranormal. But Nathan Bupp, communications director for the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims for the Paranormal in Amherst said, "When you actually look at it empirically you find that time and again psychics have not led to solving cases." Still, Rose has weighed in on local cases, including the kidnapping of Katie Beers, a 10-year-old Mastic Beach girl who was imprisoned by a family friend for 16 days in 1992 and 1993 in an underground vault. Her insights were also sought in 1999 when state police were probing the 25-year-old murder of Katherine Kolodziej, 17, a Ronkonkoma student at the State University at Cobleskill. Police said her leads helped, although the case is unsolved. ...

Source

1) I fail to see how Rose "may have helped" in any way. According to this NY Times article, Patrick McNeill Jr. drank at a bar with friends and was not seen again until his body was found drowned in a river. How did she help with that?

2) As for her "weigh[ing] in on local cases, including the kidnapping of Katie Beers," what's that mean? Did she help? Because many other psychics, ie those who take money from the desperate, like Janet Russell say they "worked on it" too.

3) As for Katherine Kolodziej, that is unsolved so MaryRose's "help" wasn't too useful.
 
Last edited:
I wish I had a radio show... Wouldn't be interesting though because I detect a lot of interesting health information in celebrities too (celebrities are people!) - but I respect their privacy and integrity and won't tell.
 
Last edited:
Her most recent book is Awakened Instincts: Seven Keys for Enhancing Every Aspect of Your Life from April 1, 2008 via Simon & Schuster. Her 22 year-old daughter, Jacqueline Sullivan, co-wrote the book. And on a skeptic's blog, someone claiming to be her daughter wrote:

...
Re: Rights and wrongs of psychic detection By C.C. Corry on 1/18/2007 9:36 AM


Sylvia Brown and Van Praagh are two of the biggest frauds out there. I still remember when Brown got it very wrong on Coast to Coast last year when she said all of the miners were dead in Virginia and while still on the air, she was told some where found alive, she stumbled and bumbled until George Noory saved her.

I do happen to know a psychic that got it right in regards to these lucky children. Her name is Mary Occhino and she has a show on Sirius Stars 102. Just the other day, a listener called in a asked Mary what she thought and to make a long story short, Mary nailed it.

She is a amazing and proud to say, my mother.

I couldn't find evidence to back up her daughter's claim about the radio show.

A little more on Mary Rose Occhino:

She is listed as an expert (Mary Occhino, I. C. E.; Intuitive Consciousness Explorer) on skinhealthtoday.com and was at Mind Body Spirit Expo 2008 with other non-wonderful people.

Also here is the Sirius XM Radio Press Release I quoted plus some more highlighting:

...
Medical Mondays: The intuitive approach to listeners' current and future health issues
Tumultuous Tuesdays: Get a grip on personal crises
Wondrous Wednesdays: A celebration of miracles
Beyond Thursdays: Connect with relatives and friends from the "beyond," and how listeners can get beyond situations that are plaguing them in this lifetime
Forever Fridays: Life and all eternity

Mary was born in Brooklyn, New York and currently resides in New York City. Mary has appeared on many radio stations and television programs throughout the United States. She is the author of Sign of the Dove: MaryRose's Messages from the Other Side and Beyond These Four Walls: Diary of a Psychic Medium. ...
 
Last edited:
I wish I had a radio show... Wouldn't be interesting though because I detect a lot of interesting health information in celebrities too (celebrities are people!) - but I respect their privacy and integrity and won't tell.
Are there any celebrities you feel are dangerously ill at the moment?

Predicting that would be very convincing to us all.

Privacy and integrity wouldn't be an issue here - if you are wrong it wouldn't matter, if you are right and they haven't had it diagnosed it could help them and if you are right and they have had it diagnosed it wouldn't matter because they would be revealing it themselves soon anyway.
 
Ashles said:
Are there any celebrities you feel are dangerously ill at the moment?
Yes.
Ashles said:
Predicting that would be very convincing to us all.

Privacy and integrity wouldn't be an issue here - if you are wrong it wouldn't matter, if you are right and they haven't had it diagnosed it could help them and if you are right and they have had it diagnosed it wouldn't matter because they would be revealing it themselves soon anyway.
I can not discuss the personal health condition of persons here or in other ways in public. Surely celebrities have chosen a public life but surely there are things that rightly belong to their personal life. Now if a celebrity contacts me and wants to know what I sense I will tell them in person. None of us are going to rush to the celebrities and tell them that some psychic said this or that.

You would have to convince me otherwise before I invade in someone's privacy and integrity in this way.
 
Yes.

I can not discuss the personal health condition of persons here or in other ways in public. Surely celebrities have chosen a public life but surely there are things that rightly belong to their personal life. Now if a celebrity contacts me and wants to know what I sense I will tell them in person. None of us are going to rush to the celebrities and tell them that some psychic said this or that.

You would have to convince me otherwise before I invade in someone's privacy and integrity in this way.



I think you need to convince us that you can do such a thing before we concern ourselves with the ethical issues.

Finding a celebrity with privacy and integrity might be a problem as well.
 
Akhenaten said:
I think you need to convince us that you can do such a thing before we concern ourselves with the ethical issues.

Finding a celebrity with privacy and integrity might be a problem as well.
Find me a celebrity who would not mind me attempting psychic medical diagnose on him or her and making that information public, and obtain their permission to do so, and I will do it. I do not share the views of the media or the public on celebrities, celebrities are people to me and I respect their privacy and integrity. Who knows, one day I will be good at what I do, and people will want to meet with me, including celebrities, and there is no way I would break that trust and to share personal information with others. It can only be done with given consent from the individual.

I would not even tell who I've seen unless that person has given me permission to do so. Now it sounds as if I meet with people and do this but I do not. If turns out I am really good at what I do, I am sure many people would be interested in meeting with me and finding out what is going on in their bodies. Also it is good for people to get confirmation for their pain and health problems, especially from someone who reaches the same conclusions on their own and independently.

And, since even if I pass a paranormal test of scientific standard and receive the title of "true medical psychic" it does not give me the licence to dispense medical information in the way that physicians do. Even if I were never incorrect, there would be a disclaimer and a reminder to continue placing your trust in conventional medicine.
 
And, since even if I pass a paranormal test of scientific standard and receive the title of "true medical psychic" it does not give me the licence to dispense medical information in the way that physicians do. Even if I were never incorrect, there would be a disclaimer and a reminder to continue placing your trust in conventional medicine.
Not only is that a good thing, it is too lax.

Is it a game to you? The life and health of people is something for you to make wild useless predictions and major life decisions based on someone with no medical training and no evidence to show that their wild speculation is nothing more than delusion.

Yes. Let's not discuss the ethics of people who put others lives at risk and yet refuse to accept responsibility for their decisions.
 
paximperium:
paximperium said:
Is it a game to you? The life and health of people is something for you to make wild useless predictions and major life decisions based on someone with no medical training and no evidence to show that their wild speculation is nothing more than delusion.

Yes. Let's not discuss the ethics of people who put others lives at risk and yet refuse to accept responsibility for their decisions.
I only give this information to family and friends, and I always remind them that "although I have never been incorrect so far when the information has been checked for accuracy, do remember that I could be wrong this time, so we can not take what I say seriously". I ask that the person lets me know whether what I told them is right or wrong, most of the information I receive is such that a person is aware of either having it or not having it. Such as shoulder pain, any other specific pain or discomfort, having had vasectomy, any particular problem with the digestive system, and many more.

Some of the things I find are such that the person can not tell me if it is correct or not, such as when I describe an internal anomaly such as "your kidneys are larger than usual although that is normal to you and it is not the case of enlargement", and information of this kind would need to be verified by a doctor or with medical imaging.

Most of what I detect are not serious health problems, but interesting information about the body of that person.

I can only recall two instances where I had detected something seriously dangerous. One was when I detected cysts of the internal reproductive system in a coworker. I was quite concerned but chose not to tell her about it. Months later she shared with us that she had become diagnosed with reproductive cysts and was scheduled for surgery. The other case occurred yesterday as a matter of fact, read about it on http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/observations.html involving a potentially serious and fatal heart problem. This was on a friend and I chose to describe the problem as specificly as I perceived it. I told him that I had never been incorrect yet, but that of course I may be incorrect this time, and that I felt obliged to share this information with him, especially since I detect that there is a way around the problem.

I detected that the cause is the consumption of deep-fried peanut oil and that a simple change in the type of fat and oil consumed would be all that can be done and would be sufficient to hault the advancement of the problem.

I would never present this information in a way that has people take their faith from the medical field and place it onto me, I remind people that doctor's order are what we go by. I would never encounter a situation where I advise a person to not see a doctor, or to stop taking their medications, or to put a person in any kind of physical danger, or to make them depending on me since personal integrity is valuable and not to be taken away. I would also not take money for this, I enjoy using my ability and am more grateful for having the ability and for having my health. I look forward to a prosperous career and have no incentive to make a living on this.

There was one case where I ordered a person to stop taking a medication. I met with a friend of mine and was shocked, I saw that his blood flow was being inhibited, and detected that the cause was a new medicine he had not been taking before. I perceived that this effect would lead to reduced blood flow to the brain, and partial brain damage due to the oxygen deficiency that would result. I told him that this medicine would kill him and that he must stop taking it and have his doctor give him another brand. He told me that yes, he was in fact on a new medication, one that is for high blood pressure. It is funny how the medical industry makes their medicines. If you have high blood pressure, they might not know how to make a medical compound that "lowers blood pressure", but they make one whose effect is to "stop blood flow" so this is administered to some extent since it, in effect, also reduces blood pressure. Another silly example is when they do not know how to make a "diuretic", a compound that lets the body remove an excess of fluid, so what they make is a serious liver toxin, to which the body responds in absolute panic, flushing it out through the kidneys with an excessive amount of fluid, so in effect, the body is dehydrated and an excess of fluid is removed.

Well he went to see his doctor and was given another alternative for blood pressure medication, which works just fine but without all of these side-effects.

I have also saved a life because of my ability. I was working at a nursing home and without even knowing that one of our elders was a diabetic (since I was new to this building and working on the lowest level where I am not required to know all the health information of the residents), yet I detected dangerously low blood sugar which was then confirmed by the other staff and with a measurement of the blood sugar level.

I do not allow people to make major life decisions based on my observations unless verified by a doctor. However I do often recommend to people that they exercise or change their diet slightly when I see that it is very necessary. I can see good reasons for exercise, increased fiber, to stop eating ham and other prepared meats, or to do eat cherries, blueberries etc but these are the harmless things said with good intention that we all like to tell ourselves and each other.

I do not want assumptions on how I would use my ability and that I would be using it in unethical ways. When there are no grounds to suspect this of me then all that it is is unfounded attacks against me as a person.
 
Find me a celebrity who would not mind me attempting psychic medical diagnose on him or her and making that information public, and obtain their permission to do so, and I will do it. I do not share the views of the media or the public on celebrities, celebrities are people to me and I respect their privacy and integrity. Who knows, one day I will be good at what I do, and people will want to meet with me, including celebrities, and there is no way I would break that trust and to share personal information with others. It can only be done with given consent from the individual.
Nothing more then a convenient cop-out.
 
I only give this information to family and friends, and I always remind them that "although I have never been incorrect so far when the information has been checked for accuracy, do remember that I could be wrong this time, so we can not take what I say seriously". I ask that the person lets me know whether what I told them is right or wrong, most of the information I receive is such that a person is aware of either having it or not having it. Such as shoulder pain, any other specific pain or discomfort, having had vasectomy, any particular problem with the digestive system, and many more.
Meaning you absolve yourself of ALL responsibility if any harm occurs because of your claim.
Some of the things I find are such that the person can not tell me if it is correct or not, such as when I describe an internal anomaly such as "your kidneys are larger than usual although that is normal to you and it is not the case of enlargement", and information of this kind would need to be verified by a doctor or with medical imaging.

Most of what I detect are not serious health problems, but interesting information about the body of that person.

I can only recall two instances where I had detected something seriously dangerous. One was when I detected cysts of the internal reproductive system in a coworker. I was quite concerned but chose not to tell her about it. Months later she shared with us that she had become diagnosed with reproductive cysts and was scheduled for surgery. The other case occurred yesterday as a matter of fact, read about it on http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/observations.html involving a potentially serious and fatal heart problem. This was on a friend and I chose to describe the problem as specificly as I perceived it. I told him that I had never been incorrect yet, but that of course I may be incorrect this time, and that I felt obliged to share this information with him, especially since I detect that there is a way around the problem.
I frankly couldn't care about your claims. Prove that it works and works better than modern medicine and then I will take you seriously.
I detected that the cause is the consumption of deep-fried peanut oil and that a simple change in the type of fat and oil consumed would be all that can be done and would be sufficient to hault the advancement of the problem.
Sure it did. Must have been the peanut oil and nothing else.
I would never present this information in a way that has people take their faith from the medical field and place it onto me, I remind people that doctor's order are what we go by. I would never encounter a situation where I advise a person to not see a doctor, or to stop taking their medications, or to put a person in any kind of physical danger, or to make them depending on me since personal integrity is valuable and not to be taken away. I would also not take money for this, I enjoy using my ability and am more grateful for having the ability and for having my health. I look forward to a prosperous career and have no incentive to make a living on this.
Meaning that you offer nothing of relevance to their health but to make people feel happy by using platitudes. I call it medical fraud.
There was one case where I ordered a person to stop taking a medication. I met with a friend of mine and was shocked, I saw that his blood flow was being inhibited, and detected that the cause was a new medicine he had not been taking before. I perceived that this effect would lead to reduced blood flow to the brain, and partial brain damage due to the oxygen deficiency that would result. I told him that this medicine would kill him and that he must stop taking it and have his doctor give him another brand. He told me that yes, he was in fact on a new medication, one that is for high blood pressure. It is funny how the medical industry makes their medicines. If you have high blood pressure, they might not know how to make a medical compound that "lowers blood pressure", but they make one whose effect is to "stop blood flow" so this is administered to some extent since it, in effect, also reduces blood pressure. Another silly example is when they do not know how to make a "diuretic", a compound that lets the body remove an excess of fluid, so what they make is a serious liver toxin, to which the body responds in absolute panic, flushing it out through the kidneys with an excessive amount of fluid, so in effect, the body is dehydrated and an excess of fluid is removed.
You are a quack and a danger to others. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Well he went to see his doctor and was given another alternative for blood pressure medication, which works just fine but without all of these side-effects.
None of which is relevant to your made up claims.
I have also saved a life because of my ability. I was working at a nursing home and without even knowing that one of our elders was a diabetic (since I was new to this building and working on the lowest level where I am not required to know all the health information of the residents), yet I detected dangerously low blood sugar which was then confirmed by the other staff and with a measurement of the blood sugar level.
So? That it? Not going to tell us how the patient was behaving and looking and we're going to take your word that your magic powers gave you this ability?
I do not allow people to make major life decisions based on my observations unless verified by a doctor. However I do often recommend to people that they exercise or change their diet slightly when I see that it is very necessary. I can see good reasons for exercise, increased fiber, to stop eating ham and other prepared meats, or to do eat cherries, blueberries etc but these are the harmless things said with good intention that we all like to tell ourselves and each other.
How profound. A nice health article in your newspaper could offer more.
I do not want assumptions on how I would use my ability and that I would be using it in unethical ways. When there are no grounds to suspect this of me then all that it is is unfounded attacks against me as a person.
I find the nonchalant way you bandie about giving "advice" and then absolving yourself of any responsibility for your actions highly unethical.

If your advice kill or harm someone, if is your fault. You don't get a free pass by claiming "I told them not to believe me". You pretend to be a medical practitioner, you get held to the same standards.
 
No I take full responsibility for what would result from my observations. Stop making unfounded attacks against me it is just ridiculous.
 
Find me a celebrity who would not mind me attempting psychic medical diagnose on him or her and making that information public, and obtain their permission to do so, and I will do it.
I hereby give you my permission, as a celebrity, to attempt psychic medical diagnosis on me and make that information public by posting it in this thread.

eta: information regarding some of my medical and physical conditions is easily found on the internet, so you'll have to find something that hasn't already been reported.
 
Last edited:
logical muse:
logical muse said:
I hereby give you my permission, as a celebrity, to attempt psychic medical diagnosis on me and make that information public by posting it in this thread.

eta: information regarding some of my medical and physical conditions is easily found on the internet, so you'll have to find something that hasn't already been reported.
Thank you! I always love to come across a person with whom I can try my ability! When I use my ability on people the purpose why I do this is to have another opportunity to assess whether I have an ability or not. If I could enter a room with a hundred people who'll let me do this I would have the best day of my life! Thank you. How do we meet?
 
Find me a celebrity who would not mind me attempting psychic medical diagnose on him or her and making that information public, and obtain their permission to do so, and I will do it. I do not share the views of the media or the public on celebrities, celebrities are people to me and I respect their privacy and integrity. Who knows, one day I will be good at what I do, and people will want to meet with me, including celebrities, and there is no way I would break that trust and to share personal information with others. It can only be done with given consent from the individual.

I would not even tell who I've seen unless that person has given me permission to do so. Now it sounds as if I meet with people and do this but I do not. If turns out I am really good at what I do, I am sure many people would be interested in meeting with me and finding out what is going on in their bodies. Also it is good for people to get confirmation for their pain and health problems, especially from someone who reaches the same conclusions on their own and independently.

And, since even if I pass a paranormal test of scientific standard and receive the title of "true medical psychic" it does not give me the licence to dispense medical information in the way that physicians do. Even if I were never incorrect, there would be a disclaimer and a reminder to continue placing your trust in conventional medicine.


I think you need to convince us that you can do such a thing before we concern ourselves with the ethical issues.

Finding a celebrity with privacy and integrity might be a problem as well.


Celebrities, light therapy, "true medical psychic". Hmm. Very scientifical, I'm sure.
 
I hereby give you my permission, as a celebrity, to attempt psychic medical diagnosis on me and make that information public by posting it in this thread.

eta: information regarding some of my medical and physical conditions is easily found on the internet, so you'll have to find something that hasn't already been reported.



logical muse:

Thank you! I always love to come across a person with whom I can try my ability! When I use my ability on people the purpose why I do this is to have another opportunity to assess whether I have an ability or not. If I could enter a room with a hundred people who'll let me do this I would have the best day of my life! Thank you. How do we meet?


Whoosh!
 
paximperium:

I only give this information to family and friends, and I always remind them that "although I have never been incorrect so far when the information has been checked for accuracy, do remember that I could be wrong this time, so we can not take what I say seriously". I ask that the person lets me know whether what I told them is right or wrong, most of the information I receive is such that a person is aware of either having it or not having it. Such as shoulder pain, any other specific pain or discomfort, having had vasectomy, any particular problem with the digestive system, and many more.

Some of the things I find are such that the person can not tell me if it is correct or not, such as when I describe an internal anomaly such as "your kidneys are larger than usual although that is normal to you and it is not the case of enlargement", and information of this kind would need to be verified by a doctor or with medical imaging.

Most of what I detect are not serious health problems, but interesting information about the body of that person.

I can only recall two instances where I had detected something seriously dangerous. One was when I detected cysts of the internal reproductive system in a coworker. I was quite concerned but chose not to tell her about it. Months later she shared with us that she had become diagnosed with reproductive cysts and was scheduled for surgery. The other case occurred yesterday as a matter of fact, read about it on http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/observations.html involving a potentially serious and fatal heart problem. This was on a friend and I chose to describe the problem as specificly as I perceived it. I told him that I had never been incorrect yet, but that of course I may be incorrect this time, and that I felt obliged to share this information with him, especially since I detect that there is a way around the problem.

I detected that the cause is the consumption of deep-fried peanut oil and that a simple change in the type of fat and oil consumed would be all that can be done and would be sufficient to hault the advancement of the problem.

I would never present this information in a way that has people take their faith from the medical field and place it onto me, I remind people that doctor's order are what we go by. I would never encounter a situation where I advise a person to not see a doctor, or to stop taking their medications, or to put a person in any kind of physical danger, or to make them depending on me since personal integrity is valuable and not to be taken away. I would also not take money for this, I enjoy using my ability and am more grateful for having the ability and for having my health. I look forward to a prosperous career and have no incentive to make a living on this.

There was one case where I ordered a person to stop taking a medication. I met with a friend of mine and was shocked, I saw that his blood flow was being inhibited, and detected that the cause was a new medicine he had not been taking before. I perceived that this effect would lead to reduced blood flow to the brain, and partial brain damage due to the oxygen deficiency that would result. I told him that this medicine would kill him and that he must stop taking it and have his doctor give him another brand. He told me that yes, he was in fact on a new medication, one that is for high blood pressure. It is funny how the medical industry makes their medicines. If you have high blood pressure, they might not know how to make a medical compound that "lowers blood pressure", but they make one whose effect is to "stop blood flow" so this is administered to some extent since it, in effect, also reduces blood pressure. Another silly example is when they do not know how to make a "diuretic", a compound that lets the body remove an excess of fluid, so what they make is a serious liver toxin, to which the body responds in absolute panic, flushing it out through the kidneys with an excessive amount of fluid, so in effect, the body is dehydrated and an excess of fluid is removed.

Well he went to see his doctor and was given another alternative for blood pressure medication, which works just fine but without all of these side-effects.

I have also saved a life because of my ability. I was working at a nursing home and without even knowing that one of our elders was a diabetic (since I was new to this building and working on the lowest level where I am not required to know all the health information of the residents), yet I detected dangerously low blood sugar which was then confirmed by the other staff and with a measurement of the blood sugar level.

I do not allow people to make major life decisions based on my observations unless verified by a doctor. However I do often recommend to people that they exercise or change their diet slightly when I see that it is very necessary. I can see good reasons for exercise, increased fiber, to stop eating ham and other prepared meats, or to do eat cherries, blueberries etc but these are the harmless things said with good intention that we all like to tell ourselves and each other.

I do not want assumptions on how I would use my ability and that I would be using it in unethical ways. When there are no grounds to suspect this of me then all that it is is unfounded attacks against me as a person.

Not to be rude, but don't you already have a thread to make your claims in? This one, according to the title, is about Mary Occhino's alleged "psychic" ability, not yours.
 
This thread really is making me wonder if VisionFromFeeling is an out and out troll.
 
logical muse:

Thank you! I always love to come across a person with whom I can try my ability! When I use my ability on people the purpose why I do this is to have another opportunity to assess whether I have an ability or not. If I could enter a room with a hundred people who'll let me do this I would have the best day of my life! Thank you. How do we meet?

Do we have to meet? Can't you do it remotely?
 
I'm a celebrity (I've appeared on national TV and national radio, and written profusely on many issues, having been published in major newspapers) who would not mind attempts of psychic medical diagnoses on me, and having that information made public.
 

Back
Top Bottom