Are you suggesting that no doctor has ever failed to diagnose clinical depression?
I'm saying the facts at hand ... the statements made by Foster's wife, family, friends and coworkers at the time of his death ... do not fit the description of clinical depression. I'm saying the doctor who actually saw Foster did not describe clinical depression. I'm saying that Fiske and Starr clearly lied when they said those folks said Foster was depressed immediately after he died. I'm saying that Fiske and Starr clearly lied when they claimed the anti-depressant was prescribed for depression. I'm saying that the doctor Starr cited to support the post-facto claim of clinical depression based his opinion on bogus facts told to him by Starr and did not use the procedure he'd successfully used in other cases when estimating the likelihood that Foster was suicidal. How can that be unclear to you at this point, Tricky?
As was mentioned before, doctors tend to start treatment at low levels and move up if needed.
As the numerous medical sources I supplied indicate, the dosage at which treatment for insomnia and depression starts is quite different. The sources seem to indicate that the dosage for treatment of depression would start at 3 times the dosage the doctor actually prescribed. The dosage that was prescribed is the recommended starting dosage for insomnia. You're spinning, Tricky. And everyone can see it.
No, it sounds like Starr interpreted clinical depression from one of the most diagnostic characteristics, namely suicide. That's not a lie.
Again, you are assuming that Foster committed suicide in order to defend Starr from charges of covering up a murder. Don't you see the logical fallacy in that?
Yeah. I'm foolish. As are all all the members of all three investigations and every judge that ruled on them.
As pointed out, there weren't three independent investigations. And the judges that ruled on Starr's investigation forced him to include an addendum that charged him with a coverup and intimidation of witnesses. The first time such a thing has happened to a special prosecutor in history.
As for the Clintons, yes, they did lie about some things, yet apparently not enough so to ever be convicted of a crime.
I guess you forgot that Bill Clinton lost his license to practice law for lying? And in fact, the reason they weren't convicted is that they weren't prosecuted. That's easy to prevent when you own the DOJ and you have a Senate that wouldn't have voted to convict even if a Clinton had raped a woman in the Rotunda of Capital building.
You haven't proved anything. You have asserted.
False. I linked you to the FBI interview notes that stated Foster's wife told the the FBI that Foster was afraid of a sleeping pill addition. And above I've supplied sources from such left wing sources as Time Magazine that corroborate this fear.
You still give absolutely no plausible reason for why a person would "fight a prescription", while ignoring quite plausible reasons why someone might scribble "fighting (depression). (Given) prescription."
I suggest you read my response to gdnp about that. Given all the other facts that are known, it's more plausible the agent was abbreviating the expression "fighting (insomnia). (Given) prescription."
You would rather invent a hitherto unheard of idiom.
You would rather invent facts not in evidence and ignore what the facts in evidence actually say.
Yet the doctor, a professional, asserts he was mildly depressed.
It must have been mild enough that no one else who knew Foster detected ANY depression. That's pretty mild. And mild is NOT clinical ... which is what Fiske and Starr claimed.
Do you have any reason to assume that all of these non-professionals should be trusted with a diagnosis?
Do you have any reason to assume that people close to Foster wouldn't be able to detect if he was depressed?
Depression isn't always evident. It fools doctors too. It is an extremely unpredictable illness.
See how desperate the Clinton supporters are, folks? They are simply conjecturing ... making up things ... in order to justify Fiske and Starr's clear lies. If they'll do that here ... will they do it for Obama when the time comes that's necessary?
Yes, it was for insomnia, though it is still an anti-depressant.
Irrelevant. As prescribed, it is for insomnia and nothing else. If Foster had significant depression, he would have been prescribed the drug at the dosage needed to treat depression. The fact remains that Starr LIED when he claimed the drug was prescribed for depression. Why'd he lie? That proves Starr was corrupt. He was not an honest investigator in this matter. The fact remains that the ONLY doctor to actually see Foster described is depression as MILD, not clinical. The fact remains that EVERYONE around Foster at the time of his death said he was NOT depressed. And no amount of spin on your part changes that, Tricky.
I have no wishes in this, other than to evaluate the evidence.
Yeah. Sure. You certainly are proving that on this thread.
You, on the other hand, have often demonstrated a hatred for anything that relates to the Clintons.
Hatred is not a factor here, Tricky. I don't *hate* the Clintons. I just think they are criminals who should no longer be in government for all the harm they did a decade ago.
Which of us is the more biased?
The one throwing out red herrings and ignoring the actual facts? The one belonging to the Cult of Clinton?
Three investigations, including at least one hostile one have said it was a suicide.
You can repeat that all you want. That doesn't change the facts. As Rodriguez pointed out, three investigations were not independent. They were all controlled by an FBI that Clinton controlled. They all ignored the same evidence. They all tampered with evidence.
The amount of cover-up that would be necessary to hide a murder would be incredible.
No, as Rodriguez pointed out, all one has to do is control a few key people. And regardless of however many it took, the facts suggest there was a coverup. You can't explain those facts (you don't even try to explain them) so you just ignore them and throw out this red herring. Sorry, it doesn't wash.
Really BAC. Look at yourself. You sound desperate
The desperate person is the one ignoring longs lists of facts they can't begin to explain. That would be you, Tricky.
If they can let go, why can't you?
Maybe they are just too close to the problem?
