JB, Spork
OK I will take your bet. I have thought of a plan.
You say, that nobody can claim to have "the correct" view, so it follows that there can be no single judge
Careful how you word this. As with lift on a wing, there is more than one valid way to look at it. That doesn't mean that every way is valid. The reality is that your theory is just plain wrong as is the "equal transit time" theory in describing how a wing generates lift.
Also, I'm not suggesting that we should use just one single judge, but nothing about the situation requires that we use multiple judges. Even so, I'm fine with using several.
I choose 10 judges.
Fine, as long as they are to my satisfaction as well.
I win if there is a majority.
Fair enough.
The money is not dependent upon supporting my view.
I don't understand what you mean. I assume the judges are deciding on which view is accurate.
I will post my calculations, and you yours, to be judged in open view, on the Physics Forum.
They can certainly be judged in open view on the physics forum if you like. But I seriously doubt you'll find 10 judges that meet our mutual satisfaction on that forum. I don't think you'll find 3 people there with the solid high school level understanding of physics.
Yes, but dishonest again. From your commentary, you have indicated that you have had previous discussion.
And now I honestly have no idea who you're talking to - or what you're talking about.
You also allowed him no right of reply. He is right, and I am paying him back.
Again, what on earth are you talking about?
I note that your only response related to these remarks. Still no physics, then
What are you talking about George?
Last edited: