Ah. . . so the bad guys don't get the internet?
Since operational security is paramount, I too have no idea why they would publish this...
... unless it's some kind of TRAP!

Ah. . . so the bad guys don't get the internet?

It's the difference between "say again," and, "repeat" (a long-time movie favourite).
Redundancy prevents errors.
Redundancy prevents errors.
Specific jargon for telecommunication is SOP in all military branches, civilian aviation, and even ham radio operators. Sometimes, **** happens. That's why there's a phonetic alphabet, for example. Communication needs to be intelligible and unambiguous.
Redundancy prevents errors.
Ten Four.
It is just a quaint tradition now. Modern technology renders this method useless for security purposes.Whats exactly the point of these codenames? If you publish them then way not use the real names instead.
What does redundancy have to do with using code names?
"Ren-crackle-crackle just left the building, but Ren-crackle-crackle needs help right away."
Exactly.It is just a quaint tradition now. Modern technology renders this method useless for security purposes.
Using a code word to refer to them prevents the possibility that other references "the President," "Obama," etc. could be heard and misconstrued as orders.
Secondly, I specifically complained about all their code names starting with the same sound as it might cause confusion! Thank you for agreeing with me.
Yikes! I hope you don't mean they intentionally leak the codenames of the decoys just to make the decoys easier targets for would-be assassins!Also, in the case of the use of a decoy, I'd be stunned if there was not a code word (let's use "Lincoln" for this example) which means "Lincoln is Obama, from now on, all references to Renegade are for the decoy."
Presumably the naming conventions reduce ambiguity in a tight situation. There are four Obamas in the White House.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Service_codenames
My favorites:
Bush Sr. - Timberwolf
Jesse Jackson - Thunder
Mondale - Dragon
Prince Charles - Unicorn
Al Gore - Sundance
Reagan - Rawhide
Nancy - Rainbow
Chelsea Clinton - Energy
I can't believe Barbara Bush's was Tranquility (also Snowbank). She should have had some variation of the c-word.
There actually is a point to using unambiguous radio jargon for these situations. It makes commands and updates sound unlike background chatter and it makes it easier to perceive the meaning of the message through interference. If you hear "DanceCHHHHHceeding to egg baskCHHHHH" you know what that means when you know the lingo.
It is just a quaint tradition now. Modern technology renders this method useless for security purposes.
I'll say it again: no way is "Renegade" and "Renaissance" more clear on the radio than "Barack" and "Michelle" or "the President" and "the First Lady".For Clarity in radio communications.
I was an Artilleryman in the US Army, and believe me, it made coordinates for artilllery fire much easier when plotting on a map using Letter/Number coordinates. It is VERY easy to mishear "Z" for "T", for instance, but not "Zulu" for "Tango",and that kind of error could end up with messy results, like a barrage of 155 shells on friendly troops.
Check or hold? Check or hold?
I'll say it again: no way is "Renegade" and "Renaissance" more clear on the radio than "Barack" and "Michelle" or "the President" and "the First Lady".
Don't like cops, do you?
For Clarity in radio communications.
Chelsea Clinton - Energy
What happens if the First Family stays at a Renaissance Hotel?
What happens if Malia goes to see Citizen Kane and someone mentions the sled?
Don't like cops, do you?
What happens if the First Family stays at a Renaissance Hotel? What happens if Malia goes to see Citizen Kane and someone mentions the sled?
Agent 1: Eagle has to get to that energy conference today. What's the ETA?
Agent 2: To her school?
Agent 1: What?
Agent 2: What?
What's yours? Bormann?