• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Lloyd England: Eye of the Storm

Hey, have Beavis and Butthead ever explained why the evil conspirators would choose to fly the plane over the Pentagon rather than into it? It would seem like that would be a million times easier than having to plant all the physical evidence and the shills like Mike Walter and Lloyd England.
 
I knew the NWO should have taken a pic of the pole in Lloyd's car...
 
dtugg said:
Hey, have Beavis and Butthead ever explained why the evil conspirators would choose to fly the plane over the Pentagon rather than into it? It would seem like that would be a million times easier than having to plant all the physical evidence and the shills like Mike Walter and Lloyd England.
Click to expand...
Geez could you imagine the staff meeting on that issue!
I mean all that planning and not one peep from anyone!
NOT ONE pain of guilt!
The Project Manager for the this must have been shaking his head in confusion!
I mean why not just fly the plane into the Pentagon!
 
Turbofan said:
Nobody is taking a stab at hole the pole ended up in Lloyd's car?
Click to expand...

What? Still no eyewitnesses and evidence that AA 77 or any "decoy" jet flew over and away from the Pentagon, Turbofan?

What's taking you so long?

A77-FlfoverExpsmall.jpg
 
I think Turbofan may be right --- it is 'impossible' for a pole sheared by a plane's wing to impale itself through a moving car, lodging in-between the front seats and beneath the back seat. It is far more likely that David Copperfield has been brainwashed by the US government enabling a mass illusion to take place.
What would compel the govt. to make the "lie" more difficult by false impaling a car?
I'm sure if an insurance company was contacted they would have more of "Copperfield's" amazing handiwork on file.
 
Bobert said:
Geez could you imagine the staff meeting on that issue!
I mean all that planning and not one peep from anyone!
NOT ONE pain of guilt!
The Project Manager for the this must have been shaking his head in confusion!
I mean why not just fly the plane into the Pentagon!
Click to expand...


Not to mention, they would never risk anyone seeing a "flyover", especially one at 500 mph. That can only mean one thing for our boys at CIT. They must now go investigate Area51 to find out how Rumsfeld/Bush/Cheney/the Reptoids cloaked AA77!

Get to it boys! I have faith in you!!
 
TLB/Turbofan....

Why do you waste your time with these OCT slurpers on here?

You know and they know(beased on reading this entire thread)that the loyalists on this site are well aware they cant explain the pole in the window at all.

The fact it HAS TO HAVE HAPPENED just to square with the official lie, doesnt bother anybody on this site.

Critical thinkers:footinmou

Yeah right...lol


I like how questions that an amoeba wouldnt even pose, like"How did they stage the poles in broad daylight" are considered on here.

As if they HAD to have been placed there in broad daylight:)


Anyhow, dont waste your breathe.

The taxi cab story is merely a poorly staged" psych op" that made the sheep be able to go, AH HA, gosh, that darn plane must have hit them and flown into the Pentagon:)
 
roundhead said:
TLB/Turbofan....

Why do you waste your time with these OCT slurpers on here?

You know and they know(beased on reading this entire thread)that the loyalists on this site are well aware they cant explain the pole in the window at all.

The fact it HAS TO HAVE HAPPENED just to square with the official lie, doesnt bother anybody on this site.

Critical thinkers:footinmou

Yeah right...lol


I like how questions that an amoeba wouldnt even pose, like"How did they stage the poles in broad daylight" are considered on here.

As if they HAD to have been placed there in broad daylight:)


Anyhow, dont waste your breathe.

The taxi cab story is merely a poorly staged" psych op" that made the sheep be able to go, AH HA, gosh, that darn plane must have hit them and flown into the Pentagon:)
Click to expand...

Can I see your theory on how the poles ended up where they did? I'd like to compare the likelihood of your competing scenario.

You do have one, don't you?
 
Last edited:
roundhead said:
TLB/Turbofan....

Why do you waste your time with these OCT slurpers on here?

You know and they know(beased on reading this entire thread)that the loyalists on this site are well aware they cant explain the pole in the window at all.

The fact it HAS TO HAVE HAPPENED just to square with the official lie, doesnt bother anybody on this site.

Critical thinkers:footinmou

Yeah right...lol


I like how questions that an amoeba wouldnt even pose, like"How did they stage the poles in broad daylight" are considered on here.

As if they HAD to have been placed there in broad daylight:)


Anyhow, dont waste your breathe.

The taxi cab story is merely a poorly staged" psych op" that made the sheep be able to go, AH HA, gosh, that darn plane must have hit them and flown into the Pentagon:)
Click to expand...

Oh, The CIT's biggest fan is back! So let us see if we follow you correctly: a huge freaking light pole laying across a major highway was planted the night before? GOTCHA.

Say Roundhead, now that you are back again, give us the math that shows that a plane can fly CIT's NOC Path: I've been asking FOR MONTHS.

See ya around

ETA: this classy link from a classy bunch of guys: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=410
 
Last edited:
That was quick. He came back from a suspension, then commits suicide by mod. Nice job.
 
roundhead said:
You know and they know (based on reading this entire thread) that the loyalists on this site are well aware they cant explain the pole in the window at all.
The fact it HAS TO HAVE HAPPENED just to square with the official lie, doesn't bother anybody on this site.
Click to expand...


Hiliting mine.

First off: I'm not loyal to anyone, let alone the American government. I'm not even an American.

Secondly: You have plainly not read this thread.
Or perhaps you missed this post to Turbofan on the first page.
Here, I'll quote the relevant bit for you:

X said:
Tell you what: You and/or CIT post the flight path calculations showing that their proposed path (with all the banking, climbing, turning, diving, what-have-you) is possible, and I'll plug through the calculations on the force required to keep the pole in the position it was in.

Deal?
Click to expand...

I am quite capable of explaining the pole. And I am only an engineering student. Here we are, surrounded by professional engineers and architects and physicists and the like, people very much smarter and more familiar with the events of that day than myself. And you actually think we can't explain the pole?
No.
It's you who cannot (or will not) understand it.

My offer still stands. Strangely, no one seems interested in taking me up on it.
Even better: I recently created a thread giving the flight dynamics calculations to CIT on a silver platter.
THE PHYSICS OF FLIGHT; a thread for CIT
Here is a link to where you can download a PDF of the discussion (with corrections and added formulae).
ANd here is where you can find a chart of the lift coefficient for a Boeing 757 aircraft, w.r.t. angle of attack.
 
Last edited:
GStan said:
With all due disrespect to CIT, I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I laughed out loud at the "JREF for Dummies" mock up at the above link.:blush:
Click to expand...
Wow that dude claimes he is 53 years old.
Unreal.
 
roundhead said:
The taxi cab story is merely a poorly staged" psych op" that made the sheep be able to go, AH HA, gosh, that darn plane must have hit them and flown into the Pentagon:
Click to expand...
Hi roundhead, quick question, how do you propose these were staged in the middle of oncoming traffic? Magic? Houdini? UFO's? I'm really curious how one goes about staging something in the middle of oncoming traffic, please, do enlighten me when you find the time :) and as an added bonus, I'll second this post as a suggestion to you

roundhead said:
Why do you waste your time with these OCT slurpers on here?
Click to expand...
That's one...

roundhead said:
You know and they know (beased on reading this entire thread) that the loyalists on this site...
Click to expand...
That's two...

roundhead said:
...are well aware they cant explain the pole in the window at all.
Click to expand...
I don't know about you, but I find the whole idea of making the claims as complex as possible kind of absurd (you still haven't gotten to how they staged that light pole in real time in the middle of traffic on the express way). :)

roundhead said:
The fact it HAS TO HAVE HAPPENED just to square with the official lie, doesnt bother anybody on this site.
Click to expand...
That's three...

roundhead said:
Critical thinkers:footinmou
Click to expand...
That's four instances of ad homs or variations there of... and that doesn't include the JREF for dummies skit. Any word on when I'll be on the next issue? :)


roundhead said:
I like how questions that an amoeba wouldnt even pose,
Click to expand...
Oops... I missed one... that's five...


roundhead said:
like"How did they stage the poles in broad daylight" are considered on here. As if they HAD to have been placed there in broad daylight:)
Click to expand...
Got a goal post? :)
What the hell... I'll take the bait!

On a busy highway? Did any reports of strange road closures from other commuters emerge? Surely CIT could jump on this one, that could be quite damning don't you think? Instead of spending time on your fanny why don't you investigate this? You clearly don't feel content with discussing the subject with us, you seem quite engrossed in that lovely magazine on the CIT forum, if you have the free time to mock people, surely someone like yourself should have plenty of time to spare investigating and doing something more productive :)

Just putting options out on the table... I'd be interested in your input roundhead, what is your opinion of this?
 
Last edited:
X said:
Hiliting mine.

First off: I'm not loyal to anyone, let alone the American government. I'm not even an American.

Secondly: You have plainly not read this thread.
Or perhaps you missed this post to Turbofan on the first page.
Here, I'll quote the relevant bit for you:



I am quite capable of explaining the pole. And I am only an engineering student. Here we are, surrounded by professional engineers and architects and physicists and the like, people very much smarter and more familiar with the events of that day than myself. And you actually think we can't explain the pole?
No.
It's you who cannot (or will not) understand it.

My offer still stands. Strangely, no one seems interested in taking me up on it.
Even better: I recently created a thread giving the flight dynamics calculations to CIT on a silver platter.
THE PHYSICS OF FLIGHT; a thread for CIT
Here is a link to where you can download a PDF of the discussion (with corrections and added formulae).
ANd here is where you can find a chart of the lift coefficient for a Boeing 757 aircraft, w.r.t. angle of attack.
Click to expand...

I just read your reply again and there's nothing to show the possibilty
of HOW the pole ended up in your theoretical position.

The reply just states how a pole may have wedged itself in that position,
however there is no data to support how a 30+ section of pole fell over
and then horizontally suspended itself in mid air while sliding into place
missing the hood and roof of the car.

I will upload a scale animation of this concept shortly. UNtil then let's
read up on the phsyics, or possible trajectory of the light pole after being
hit by the aircarft.

You must consider Lloyd's account, the direction of force, traffic flow, etc.

Waiting patiently.
 
So, Turbo, how did the NWO plant a large light pole in a taxi in broad daylight on a busy street without anybody noticing?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom