What I cannot understand is why so many people kill themselves over the office of the President. No matter who wins, our daily life is not going to change. Yet the woo's act like every single President is going to be the end of the world as we know it.
Its not even consistent anymore. Out of the 2 candidates, Obama is the person whose record shows that he is not stringently pro-Israel on everything like McCain is. So if the jewbs are behind everything, why did they put someone into power who doesn't support them as strongly as the other guy would?
I think the jews in power are getting a bit senile with their whole "rule the world" business.
Well, Rahm's appointment shows that Obama is not likely to really be less "pro-Israel" than McCain - maybe less "pro-likud", but there wont be a change in the fact America will still be strongly on-side w/ Israel. There was no "pro-Israel" and "anti-ISrael" candidate: there were two "pro-Israel" candidates.
The thing I don't get about the Alex Jones and anti-NWO theory generally is their lack of realism with regards to the implementation of whatever policies it is they'd like to see. Thats a murky spot given that its more of an "anti" movement than it is a "pro" movement - but you'd guess that underneath at least they want a Ron Paul style approach to foreign policy. We'll leave aside domestic policy given the cleavage between the libertarian and left-wing of this demographic.
So - you want a Ron Paul style foreign policy. A dismantling of American bases, a dismantling of the military industrial complex and so on...
Can't they see that before we can do that, we gotta work our way - slowly - towards that goal? Is there *any* sign in the current political environment that such an idea is even held by anyone considered "mainstream"?
So candidate X gets elected and they're immediately criticized as "stooges" for not immediately enacting their policies - when really, even if an Amy Goodman/Chomsky ticket made it to the white house they'd still have a congress of unknown composition to deal with, America would still have committments abroad and pressures abroad from friend and foe that necessitate a presence, the billions that course through the MIC keep a healthy chunk of America employed - how are we going to deal with that transition?
The list literally goes on and on. In my mind, they're missing the forest for the trees - hyperfocusing on individuals and their connections and even whatever occult practises they may be into - completely oblivious to the fact that the same systemic pressures that created those individuals would still be there if they were excised. A new crop of NWO Lizardmen would arise under those pressures. The political culture just isn't ready for those kind of drastic moves and they may never be. Trying to even picture such an environment in America challenges the mind and to be honest I can't even do it.
Of course, they're not really interested in the cohesiveness of their policies or their chances for implementation - there really is no single platform they adhere to. You got your "battle in seattle" left-wing with its myriad of internal conflicts, you have your right-wing extremists with a radically different idea of how the country should be run. They're all about being against the "elites", against the "corporations" and against the "NWO agenda" - and when they try to describe how those things work all they do is harp on things like the CFR and the Trilateral commission and bloodlines and the Rothschilds.
The CFR and the Trilateral comission are really just simple policy instruments - really banal in their workings when you get down to it. They are only a few among many influences on policy development - and you don't hear much about any of those other influences, how they may compete with the CFR etc...
The Rothschilds are only one among many wealthy and powerful families.
There's just a serious lack of depth in their analysis. Put simply, to criticize Obama for having establishment advisors and establishment support and campaign donations from lobbyists misses the fact that *any* winning candidate HAS to have those things. If thats your criteria for condemnation then there would never be any candidate that could escape it. Even one that would bring some of your ideas incrementally closer to actually happening.
The problem isn't Obama - or Brezinski - or the Rothschilds. Its the
system mannnnnn! And I don't think I've ever come across a solid systemic analysis among the NWO True Believers.
