Truther Candidates Completely Rejected By US Voters

[Minadin]

If infowars said the sky was blue, I'd double check.

 

[1337m4n]

Furthermore, I am not convinced that necessarily everyone who voted for McKinney is a Truther. She was running as a Green; most of her voters would be heavy environmentalists. Truthers don't even believe in global warming.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

So first some of you claim you agree with Obama but won't say who should be held accountable.

But now it's fake letter according to you. So do you not agree anymore? If you do agree fake or not then who do you agree should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

Just curious. If Infowars were to post a fake letter why didn't the letter fully agree with Government complicity?

Hmmm?

 

[JihadJane]

Truthers don't even believe in global warming.

This is about as true as saying all Untruthers are skinheads.

 

[johnny karate]

So first some of you claim you agree with Obama but won't say who should be held accountable.

But now it's fake letter according to you. So do you not agree anymore? If you do agree fake or not then who do you agree should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

How can someone within the government be held accountable for preventing attacks the government itself covertly carried out?

You can't defend a LIHOP position when you are so clearly in the MIHOP camp. The two positions are contradictory in too many fundamental ways.

Just curious. If Infowars were to post a fake letter why didn't the letter fully agree with Government complicity?

Hmmm?

Because then it would obviously be a fake, as no candidate serious about gaining the presidency would say something that ridiculous. Infowars may be run by liars and idiots, but they're not that stupid

 

[johnny karate]

This is about as true as saying all Untruthers are skinheads.

Or saying that many family members of 9/11 victims support a new investigation.

 

[leftysergeant]

Old "Hang 'em High" Barrett did pretty well for a guy who was arrested for domestic abuse during the campaign.

From the linked article, we may safely assume one fact and infer the possibility of two others.

We can be sure that his wife does not care at all about seeing him elected.

We have grounds to suspect that their marriage is in trouble.

We have some reason to suspect that the marriage is in trouble because Barrett is a sociopathic thug. (Not that we didn't already suspect that.)

 

[Bobert]

I wonder if the commnet Obama made about how his daughters had earned that new puppy was really a secret NWO communication?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Who do you agree should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

 

[Jonnyclueless]

It was a system wide failure, not one on the part of one or two people. That's why you can't have your little witch hunt.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

It was a system wide failure, not one on the part of one or two people. That's why you can't have your little witch hunt.

The question is for those who were in agreement with the letter or at least felt it was more in line with how they felt about the 9/11 investigation then it was with how truthers feel about it.

So...

Who do those people feel should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

 

[Thunder]

9-11 Truthers should indeed be held accountable.

 

[Bobert]

The question is for those who were in agreement with the letter or at least felt it was more in line with how they felt about the 9/11 investigation then it was with how truthers feel about it.

So...

Who do those people feel should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

Why comment on a letter that there is no evidence is really even from Obama?
Why give that crack head Alex Jones anymore attention then he deserves?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Why comment on a letter that there is no evidence is really even from Obama?
Why give that crack head Alex Jones anymore attention then he deserves?

They already did comment on it. They just didn't clarify. So no running and hiding that it was fake with no proof that it was fake.

Because fake or not some claimed to be in agreement with it.

So who do they feel should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

 

[Dr Adequate]

Because fake or not some claimed to be in agreement with it.

So who do they feel should be held accountable and based on what investigation?

Well, principally Al Qaeda of course, but in the spirit in which your question is asked, one might also criticize the US government (as it was constituted on 9/11) for unpreparedness. This view would of course be based on the investigation that has already taken place. You know, the one into 9/11?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Well, principally Al Qaeda of course, but in the spirit in which your question is asked, one might legitimately also criticize the US government (as it was constituted on 9/11) for unpreparedness. This view would of course be based on the investigation that has already taken place. You know, the one into 9/11?

Al Qaeda was responsible for protecting the US?

 

[Dr Adequate]

Al Qaeda was responsible for protecting the US?

No.

It's at times like this that I wonder whether Truthism is really a delusional belief system or merely a cognitive disorder.

No, Al Qaeda has never been responsible for protecting the US. They were, however, responsible for attacking it. These are two different things.

Do you understand now?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

No.

It's at times like this that I wonder whether Truthism is really a delusional belief system or merely a cognitive disorder.

No, Al Qaeda has never been responsible for protecting the US. They were, however, responsible for attacking it. These are two different things.

Do you understand now?

LOL

Yeah I was just wondering the same thing about you.

Try reading the thread.

Then try comprehending it.

Good luck.

 

[johnny karate]

The question is for those who were in agreement with the letter...

Which would therefore preclude you from participating in this discussion since you don't believe the premise on which the letter is based.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Which would therefore preclude you from participating in this discussion since you don't believe the premise on which the letter is based.

Why not? I'm not the one to claim I know what happened on 9/11 and that no one needs to be held accountable for not doing their job to protect the US.