• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Truther Candidates Completely Rejected By US Voters

Barrett's claims of victory is more proof that Mark Twain was right when he spoke of 'Liars, Damned Liars, and Statiscians".
 
The truther mandate gets its clock cleaned in every contest they entered, and they claim victory? :jaw-dropp Only truthers can twist the evidence in this fashion.
 
Let's put this in even more perspective, McKinney received an average of about 3,000 votes per state. Pathetic.
 
So who should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes the US made in the run-up to 9/11 and based on what investigation?

Hello?
 
I still find it funny that the evil NWO would murder 3000 human beings but not rig an election so that the right stays in power.
 
Bobert said:
I still find it funny that the evil NWO would murder 3000 human beings but not rig an election so that the right stays in power.
Click to expand...


Edited by Gaspode: 
Removed personal attack


So who should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes the US made in the run-up to 9/11 and based on what investigation?

Or isn't it funny?

Do not use personal attacks to argue your point.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Homeland Insurgency said:
So who should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes the US made in the run-up to 9/11 and based on what investigation?

Hello?
Click to expand...

What do you mean by "held accountable"?

And if you're querying the investigation, and believe in an inside job, what do you care who the inside-jobbers' investigation reveals as being "accountable"? :confused: Are you just playing "gotcha"?
 
orphia nay said:
What do you mean by "held accountable"?

And if you're querying the investigation, and believe in an inside job, what do you care who the inside-jobbers' investigation reveals as being "accountable"? :confused: Are you just playing "gotcha"?
Click to expand...

Christ. Read the thread before you post. What does Obama mean?
 
orphia nay said:
Touchy? I'm asking you what you think it means. This may or may not be different to what Obama means, which is why I'm asking you what you think it means.
Click to expand...

He means that some people didn't do their job and weren't held accountable. Why they didn't do their job was never really investigated.

Now I'm dying to know how you've worked it out in your head to mean.
 
Tweeter said:
Thats why people want further investigation into the matter.
Most debunkers try to excuse the incompetence like it couldnt be prevented.
Click to expand...
I blame you for 9/11, you failed to warn anyone and you seem to know it was coming! You forgot to warn everyone! Failure is yours; did you ever have a clue?

Alas, did you ever have a clue, do have a clue, why is it you seem like you will never have a clue on 9/11?? So, what is next; 7 years and you still have no idea what happen on 9/11, or you will try to understand the evidence on record.

I guess I can’t blame you, are you just a terrorist apologist?
 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
He means that some people didn't do their job and weren't held accountable. Why they didn't do their job was never really investigated.

Now I'm dying to know how you've worked it out in your head to mean.
Click to expand...

I'm asking you what you think "held accountable" means, and you give me a definition using the same term. :confused: :shrug:

Do you really just mean "investigated" or did you want to see heads roll, so to speak? That is all.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
He means that some people didn't do their job and weren't held accountable. Why they didn't do their job was never really investigated.
Click to expand...

Yes, but 9/11 was an inside job, remember? To defend a position that certain people should be held accountable for failing to prevent an attack you believe was staged by those very people is retarded.

And since Obama is the one presenting that position, this would make him either a dupe or an accomplice according to your world view.

So which is it?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Completely Rejected?

Dear Penny:

Thank you for contacting me regarding your belief that the U.S. government was complicit in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. I appreciate hearing your passionate views on this matter.

While I do not believe the U.S. government was complicit in the attacks, I do think it should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes it made in the run-up to that terrible day. The blunders that occurred prior to the 2001 attacks were inexcusable and often outrageous. The series of clear warnings about the potential use of hijacked planes as weapons is just one example of why the "surprise" of 9/11 should have been anticipated. In my view, proof of government complicity is not necessary when making the argument that the U.S. should accept some responsibility for what happened on 9/11.

Thank you again for writing.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama
United States Senator
Click to expand...

Bobert said:
Do you have a link to where this "letter" came from?
Click to expand...

Bump.


ETA: I think I found it:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/february2007/150207Obama.htm
 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
Edited by Gaspode: 
Removed personal attack


So who should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes the US made in the run-up to 9/11 and based on what investigation?

Or isn't it funny?
Click to expand...
You believe that the NWO or whomever would not hesitate to murder 3000 humans but they wouldn't fix the election so that they could retain power?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait... is the letter to "Penny" real or not? I was taking it to be real but misrepresented because there's nothing actually conspiratorial there; again, it's a LIHOI letter.

But if the source is Infowars, then its providence must be doubted until independently proven. That domain is famous for its lies and distortions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom