• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Heiwa's Pizza Box Experiment

Heiwa said:
BTW - an experiment is, e.g. 'a test or trial carried out carefully in order to study what happens and gain new knowledge'.

So, I believe in experiments ... to gain new knowledge. And the PBT experiment doesn't cost much if you eat the pizzas afterwards. BUT - no need for pizzas in the boxes.
Click to expand...
But, the PBT “experiment” fails completely in the areas of carefully and gains new knowledge.

Costs less. Bazant and NIST are too poor to experiment.
Click to expand...
Yeah, of course. They were too poor to scrape together a couple of pizza boxes so they settled for hundreds of hours of research and professional computer simulations instead.
 
TheDaver said:
But, the PBT “experiment” fails completely in the areas of carefully and gains new knowledge.


Yeah, of course. They were too poor to scrape together a couple of pizza boxes so they settled for hundreds of hours of research and professional computer simulations instead.
Click to expand...

The PBT experiment provides new knowledge to those who don't know what an impact is. Observation is also required before you do research and computer simulations.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dtx_GcFCs6c&feature=related
 
As Mythbusters proved last night, the Pepperoni Pizza (in its box and "Hot" carrier), in stacks of as few as 5 pizzas, will stop a bullet.
Therefore, Pizza and boxes are biased toward non-collapse...
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Why don't you try it? Why don't you try anything?
Click to expand...

Do you really need someone to actually blow up a stack of pizza boxes to prove that explosives will blow up a stack of pizza boxes?

How about we do it in your back yard so you can readily see the results? Just give us your address and we'll proceed to carry out the experiment in front of your eyes.

The police, fire, and medical personnel that show up as a result of the explosions will be your responsibility.
 
Zipster said:
Do you really need someone to actually blow up a stack of pizza boxes to prove that explosives will blow up a stack of pizza boxes?

How about we do it in your back yard so you can readily see the results? Just give us your address and we'll proceed to carry out the experiment in front of your eyes.

The police, fire, and medical personnel that show up as a result of the explosions will be your responsibility.
Click to expand...

The PBT experiment is quite safe if you follow instructions. The upper part - the impactor - will just bounce on the PBT! And that's what should have happened on 9/11. What you see on all videos is just an exotic CD that Bazant and Nist later blame on a little flexible, low weight upper part consisting of some columns, a few floors ... and plenty of air.

I am still very curious how this exotic CD was arranged. Any ideas?
 
Toke said:
How long is the stack to burn before impact?
Click to expand...

Nothing is burning in the PBT experiment! Just drop the PBT impactor and note how it bounces on the PBT. Same thing should have happen with the WTC1 upper part impactor!
You don't believe still the Bazant/NIST global collapse ensues propagande, do you?
 
Heiwa said:
Nothing is burning in the PBT experiment! Just drop the PBT impactor and note how it bounces on the PBT. Same thing should have happen with the WTC1 upper part impactor!
You don't believe still the Bazant/NIST global collapse ensues propagande, do you?
Click to expand...

The WTC1 impactor should have bounced? Do you think you might have a slight scaling error?
 
You got the experiment wrong, the towers were burning before collapsing.
So of course the pbt has to burn as well for some time before impact.

The problem is how to scale the burning time.
 
Toke said:
You got the experiment wrong, the towers were burning before collapsing.
So of course the pbt has to burn as well for some time before impact.

The problem is how to scale the burning time.
Click to expand...

No, the PBT experiment starts when the upper part - the impactor - is dropped. No burning. Only the impactor effect on the intact (not burned) lower structure is studied. And it bounces every time.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Has anyone here made a better experiment yet?
Click to expand...


Breaking wind would be a better experiment. To ask if anyone has made a better experiment in regards to an invalid experiment is a bit silly don't you think? What are you hoping for? Someone maybe moving up to a beer keg experiment?
 
Jonnyclueless said:
Breaking wind would be a better experiment. To ask if anyone has made a better experiment in regards to an invalid experiment is a bit silly don't you think? What are you hoping for? Someone maybe moving up to a beer keg experiment?
Click to expand...

Anything besides empty ridicule would be a change.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Anything besides empty ridicule would be a change.
Click to expand...

ironymeteruv6.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom